Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940, Leioa, Basque Country, Spain; Research Centre for Experimental Marine Biology and Biotechnology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48620, Plentzia, Basque Country, Spain.
Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940, Leioa, Basque Country, Spain.
Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;339:139690. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139690. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
The use of suspect and non-target screening (SNTS) for the characterization of the chemical exposome employing human biofluids is gaining attention. Among the biofluids, urine is one of the preferred matrices since organic xenobiotics are excreted through it after metabolization. However, achieving a consensus between selectivity (i.e. preserving as many compounds as possible) and sensitivity (i.e. minimizing matrix effects by removing interferences) at the sample preparation step is challenging. Within this context, several sample preparation approaches, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), salt-assisted LLE (SALLE) and dilute-and-shoot (DS) were tested to screen not only exogenous compounds in human urine but also their phase II metabolites using liquid-chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). Additionally, enzymatic hydrolysis of phase II metabolites was evaluated. Under optimal conditions, SPE resulted in the best sample preparation approach in terms of the number of detected xenobiotics and metabolites since 97.1% of the total annotated suspects were present in samples extracted by SPE. In LLE and SALLE, pure ethyl acetate turned out to be the best extractant but fewer suspects than with SPE (80.7%) were screened. Lastly, only 52.5% of the suspects were annotated in the DS approach, showing that it could only be used to detect compounds at high concentration levels. Using pure standards, the presence of diverse xenobiotics such as parabens, industrial chemicals (benzophenone-3, caprolactam and mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate) and chemicals related to daily habits (caffeine, cotinine or triclosan) was confirmed. Regarding enzymatic hydrolysis, only 10 parent compounds of the 44 glucuronides were successfully annotated in the hydrolysed samples. Therefore, the screening of metabolites in non-hydrolysed samples through SNTS is the most suitable approach for exposome characterization.
采用可疑物和非靶向筛查(SNTS)技术来描述人生物体液中的化学暴露组学正受到关注。在生物体液中,尿液是首选基质之一,因为有机外来化合物在代谢后通过尿液排泄。然而,在样品制备步骤中实现选择性(即保留尽可能多的化合物)和敏感性(即通过去除干扰最小化基质效应)之间的共识是具有挑战性的。在这种情况下,已经测试了几种样品制备方法,包括固相萃取(SPE)、液液萃取(LLE)、盐辅助液液萃取(SALLE)和稀释和进样(DS),不仅用于筛查人尿液中的外源性化合物,还用于筛查它们的 II 期代谢物,方法是使用液相色谱-高分辨串联质谱(LC-HRMS/MS)。此外,还评估了 II 期代谢物的酶水解。在最佳条件下,SPE 在检测的外来化合物和代谢物数量方面是最佳的样品制备方法,因为在 SPE 提取的样品中存在 97.1%的总注释可疑物。在 LLE 和 SALLE 中,纯乙酸乙酯被证明是最好的萃取剂,但筛选出的可疑物比 SPE 少(80.7%)。最后,只有 52.5%的可疑物在 DS 方法中被注释,表明它只能用于检测高浓度水平的化合物。使用纯标准品,证实了存在各种外来化合物,如对羟基苯甲酸酯、工业化学品(二苯甲酮-3、己内酰胺和单-2-乙基-5-羟基己基邻苯二甲酸酯)和与日常生活习惯相关的化学品(咖啡因、可替宁或三氯生)。关于酶水解,只有 44 个葡萄糖醛酸苷中的 10 个母体化合物在水解样品中成功被注释。因此,通过 SNTS 对非水解样品中的代谢物进行筛查是暴露组学特征描述的最适合方法。