• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
POINT: Pipeline for Offline Conversion and Integration of Geocodes and Neighborhood Data.要点:地理编码和社区数据的离线转换和集成管道。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):833-842. doi: 10.1055/a-2148-6414. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
[Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].谁命中目标?谷歌与开放街道地图免费地理编码服务的比较研究
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Sep;77(8-9):e160-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549939. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
3
Characterizing the neighborhood risk environment in multisite clinic-based cohort studies: A practical geocoding and data linkages protocol for protected health information.基于多地点诊所队列研究的社区风险环境特征描述:一种用于保护健康信息的实用地理编码和数据链接协议。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 29;17(12):e0278672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278672. eCollection 2022.
4
Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.两种地理编码方法在基于地理信息系统的流行病学研究暴露评估中的准确性
Environ Health. 2017 Feb 24;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0217-5.
5
Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.俄克拉荷马州城乡癌症登记地址地理编码的改进
J Registry Manag. 2020 Spring;47(1):13-20.
6
[Geocoding one million of addresses using API: a semiautomatic multistep procedure].[使用应用程序编程接口对一百万个地址进行地理编码:一种半自动多步骤程序]
Epidemiol Prev. 2022 May-Jun;46(3):160-167. doi: 10.19191/EP22.3.A463.031.
7
Accuracy of residential geocoding in the Agricultural Health Study.农业健康研究中住宅地理编码的准确性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Oct 7;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-37.
8
Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.在受全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOA)污染的社区中对农村地址进行地理编码:方法比较。
Environ Health. 2010 Apr 21;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-18.
9
Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.两种常用地理编码方法之间位置差异的评估。
Geospat Health. 2011 May;5(2):265-73. doi: 10.4081/gh.2011.179.
10
Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.使用地理信息系统(GIS)方法量化地理编码位置误差。
Environ Health. 2007 Apr 4;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-10.

本文引用的文献

1
From Genes to Geography, from Cells to Community, from Biomolecules to Behaviors: The Importance of Social Determinants of Health.从基因到地理,从细胞到社区,从生物分子到行为:健康的社会决定因素的重要性。
Biomolecules. 2022 Oct 9;12(10):1449. doi: 10.3390/biom12101449.
2
The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review.电子健康记录中社会决定因素数据的质量:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):187-196. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab199.
3
Uncertainty in geospatial health: challenges and opportunities ahead.地理空间卫生中的不确定性:未来的挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;65:15-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights.电子健康记录中健康的社会决定因素数据的文档记录和审查:措施和相关见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2608-2616. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab194.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
6
Impact of Multiple Social Determinants of Health on Incident Stroke.多种健康社会决定因素对卒中事件的影响。
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2445-2453. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028530. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
bench4gis: Benchmarking Privacy-aware Geocoding with Open Big Data.bench4gis:使用开放大数据对隐私感知地理编码进行基准测试。
Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data. 2019 Dec;2019:4067-4070. doi: 10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9006234. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival.乳腺癌风险、分期和生存的社会决定因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;177(3):537-548. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
Integrating Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health into Population Health Analytics: A Conceptual Framework and Suggested Road Map.将社会和行为健康决定因素纳入人口健康分析:概念框架和建议路线图。
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Dec;22(6):488-494. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0151. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
A public health perspective on using electronic health records to address social determinants of health: The potential for a national system of local community health records in the United States.从公共卫生角度看利用电子健康记录解决健康的社会决定因素:在美国建立国家社区卫生记录系统的潜力。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Apr;124:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

要点:地理编码和社区数据的离线转换和集成管道。

POINT: Pipeline for Offline Conversion and Integration of Geocodes and Neighborhood Data.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):833-842. doi: 10.1055/a-2148-6414. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1055/a-2148-6414
PMID:37541656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10584391/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Geocoding, the process of converting addresses into precise geographic coordinates, allows researchers and health systems to obtain neighborhood-level estimates of social determinants of health. This information supports opportunities to personalize care and interventions for individual patients based on the environments where they live. We developed an integrated offline geocoding pipeline to streamline the process of obtaining address-based variables, which can be integrated into existing data processing pipelines.

METHODS

POINT is a web-based, containerized, application for geocoding addresses that can be deployed offline and made available to multiple users across an organization. Our application supports use through both a graphical user interface and application programming interface to query geographic variables, by census tract, without exposing sensitive patient data. We evaluated our application's performance using two datasets: one consisting of 1 million nationally representative addresses sampled from Open Addresses, and the other consisting of 3,096 previously geocoded patient addresses.

RESULTS

A total of 99.4 and 99.8% of addresses in the Open Addresses and patient addresses datasets, respectively, were geocoded successfully. Census tract assignment was concordant with reference in greater than 90% of addresses for both datasets. Among successful geocodes, median (interquartile range) distances from reference coordinates were 52.5 (26.5-119.4) and 14.5 (10.9-24.6) m for the two datasets.

CONCLUSION

POINT successfully geocodes more addresses and yields similar accuracy to existing solutions, including the U.S. Census Bureau's official geocoder. Addresses are considered protected health information and cannot be shared with common online geocoding services. POINT is an offline solution that enables scalability to multiple users and integrates downstream mapping to neighborhood-level variables with a pipeline that allows users to incorporate additional datasets as they become available. As health systems and researchers continue to explore and improve health equity, it is essential to quickly and accurately obtain neighborhood variables in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant way.

摘要

目的

地理编码是将地址转换为精确地理坐标的过程,它使研究人员和卫生系统能够获得基于邻里的健康决定因素的估计值。这些信息支持根据患者居住的环境为个体患者提供个性化护理和干预的机会。我们开发了一个集成的离线地理编码管道,以简化获取基于地址的变量的过程,这些变量可以集成到现有的数据处理管道中。

方法

POINT 是一个基于网络的、容器化的地址地理编码应用程序,可以离线部署,并可供组织内的多个用户使用。我们的应用程序支持通过图形用户界面和应用程序编程接口查询地理变量,按普查区进行查询,而不会暴露敏感的患者数据。我们使用两个数据集来评估我们的应用程序的性能:一个包含从 Open Addresses 中抽取的 100 万个具有全国代表性的地址,另一个包含 3096 个先前地理编码的患者地址。

结果

Open Addresses 和患者地址数据集的地址分别有 99.4%和 99.8%被成功地理编码。对于两个数据集,普查区的分配与参考值的一致性均大于 90%。在成功地理编码的地址中,参考坐标的中位数(四分位距)距离分别为 52.5(26.5-119.4)和 14.5(10.9-24.6)米。

结论

POINT 成功地理编码了更多的地址,并且与包括美国人口普查局官方地理编码器在内的现有解决方案具有相似的准确性。地址被视为受保护的健康信息,不能与常见的在线地理编码服务共享。POINT 是一个离线解决方案,可实现多个用户的可扩展性,并将下游映射集成到邻里级别的变量中,使用户可以在可用时将其他数据集纳入其中。随着卫生系统和研究人员继续探索和改善健康公平,以符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的方式快速准确地获取邻里变量至关重要。