Department of Anesthesia, CHUV, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):313-319. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104681.
Previous trials favored a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block over a single injection for major shoulder surgery. However, these trials did not administer a multimodal analgesic regimen. This randomized, controlled unblinded trial tested the hypothesis that a continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block still provides superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac.
Sixty patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive a bolus of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 mL, with or without a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-8 mL/hour, for an interscalene brachial plexus block. Patients were provided with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on movement, and functional outcomes, measured over 48 hours after surgery.
Median (IQR) cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively was 10 mg (4-24) in the continuous infusion group and 14 mg (8-26) in the single injection group (p=0.74). No significant between-group differences were found for any of the secondary outcomes.
A continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block does not provide superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac. The findings of this study are limited by performance and detection biases.
NCT04394130.
先前的试验表明,与单次注射相比,连续的锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞在进行大肩部手术时更具优势。然而,这些试验并没有给予多模式镇痛方案。本随机、对照、非盲试验旨在检验假设,即在多模式镇痛方案(包括静脉注射地塞米松、镁、对乙酰氨基酚和酮咯酸)的情况下,与单次注射相比,连续输注局部麻醉药用于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞,在大肩部手术后仍能提供更好的镇痛效果。
60 名接受肩部关节置换术或关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受 0.5%罗哌卡因 20ml 推注,或在此基础上给予 0.2%罗哌卡因 4-8ml/h 持续输注,用于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞。患者还接受静脉注射吗啡自控镇痛。主要观察指标是术后 24 小时内累计静脉吗啡消耗量。次要观察指标包括术后 48 小时内的静息和运动时疼痛评分以及功能结局。
术后 24 小时内,连续输注组累积静脉吗啡消耗量中位数(IQR)为 10mg(4-24),单次注射组为 14mg(8-26)(p=0.74)。两组在任何次要观察指标上均无显著差异。
在多模式镇痛方案(包括静脉注射地塞米松、镁、对乙酰氨基酚和酮咯酸)的情况下,与单次注射相比,连续输注局部麻醉药用于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞并不能提供更好的大肩部手术后镇痛效果。本研究结果受到执行和检测偏倚的限制。
NCT04394130。