• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Transoral robotic surgery vs. non-robotic surgeries for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2537-2546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01689-6. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01689-6
PMID:37542007
Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and non-robotic surgeries (NRES) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), medical databases were searched including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to January 2023. The methodology follows PRISMA guidelines, including the PRISMA flow diagram. Data from the included studies were extracted independently by two researchers. Seven studies involving five hundred seventy-seven patients were included. Of these, 275 underwent TORS and 302 underwent NRES. The disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TORS group than in the NRES group (OR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.92-6.15, P < 0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in positive surgical margins, hospital stays, operation time, blood loss, postoperative bleeding rate, perioperative tracheostomy, perioperative feeding tube, and overall survival rate. These findings can initially guide the preoperative counseling of TORS in patients with OPSCC, and preliminarily confirm that the adoption of TORS deserves careful consideration.

摘要

为了比较经口机器人手术(TORS)和非机器人手术(NRES)在口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)患者中的疗效,检索了包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 在内的医学数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 1 月。该方法遵循 PRISMA 指南,包括 PRISMA 流程图。由两名研究人员独立提取纳入研究的数据。共纳入 7 项研究,涉及 577 例患者。其中 275 例行 TORS,302 例行 NRES。TORS 组的无病生存率显著高于 NRES 组(OR=3.43,95%CI 1.92-6.15,P<0.0001)。然而,两组在阳性切缘、住院时间、手术时间、出血量、术后出血率、围手术期气管切开术、围手术期喂养管和总生存率方面无显著差异。这些发现可以初步指导 OPSCC 患者 TORS 的术前咨询,并初步证实 TORS 的采用值得仔细考虑。

相似文献

1
Transoral robotic surgery vs. non-robotic surgeries for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2537-2546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01689-6. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗口咽、下咽和喉上部鳞状细胞癌的治疗效果:日本多中心回顾性观察研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.经口激光微创手术和经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌的结果。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Apr;48(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Transoral robotic surgery versus nonrobotic resection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术切除口咽鳞状细胞癌的比较。
Head Neck. 2021 Jul;43(7):2259-2273. doi: 10.1002/hed.26724. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
5
Comparison of margins and survival between transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and non-robotic endoscopic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer.经口机器人手术(TORS)与非机器人内镜手术治疗口咽癌的切缘与生存率比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Nov-Dec;44(6):103982. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103982. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Specimen-Based Resection Margins and Local Control during Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal HPV-Mediated Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口咽人乳头瘤病毒介导的鳞状细胞癌经口机器人手术中基于标本的切缘与局部控制
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(2):80-87. doi: 10.1159/000527369. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Feeding Tube Placement Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞癌后行饲管置放。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr;166(4):696-703. doi: 10.1177/01945998211020302. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
[The clinical value of oral robotic surgery in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma].口腔机器人手术在口咽鳞状细胞癌治疗中的临床价值
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):570-576. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200731-00698.
9
A prospective evaluation of short-term dysphagia after transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌后短期吞咽困难的前瞻性评估。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3132-3140. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30712. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口机器人手术与开放性手术治疗口咽癌的比较安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;46(4 Pt A):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.185. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical margins after open versus transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer and their impact on the need for multimodal treatments.口咽癌开放手术与经口手术的手术切缘及其对多模式治疗需求的影响。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 May;45(Suppl. 1):S15-S24. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1027.

本文引用的文献

1
An introductory review of robotically assisted surgical systems.机器人辅助手术系统简介综述。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Aug;18(4):e2409. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2409. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022.NCCN 指南®洞察:头颈部癌症,第 1.2022 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Mar;20(3):224-234. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0016.
3
Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan.
经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗口咽、下咽和喉上部鳞状细胞癌的治疗效果:日本多中心回顾性观察研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Versus Non-TORS Tongue Resection for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.经口机器人手术(TORS)与非 TORS 舌切除术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1735-E1740. doi: 10.1002/lary.29316. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.经口激光微创手术和经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌的结果。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Apr;48(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗早期口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的生存比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1555-1562. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3172.
7
Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口机器人手术与开放性手术治疗口咽癌的比较安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;46(4 Pt A):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.185. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Evaluation of robotic surgery for transoral resection of T1-2 squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa.评估机器人手术用于经口切除扁桃体窝 T1-2 期鳞状细胞癌。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020 Jan;137(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
Thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer - recent advances and future directions.分化型甲状腺癌的甲状腺手术——最新进展和未来方向。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Nov;14(11):670-683. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0080-7.