Suppr超能文献

多模式与术中无阿片麻醉在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机研究。

Comparison between multimodal and intraoperative opioid free anesthesia for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized study.

机构信息

1st Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.

Szpital Kliniczny Dzieciątka Jezus, ul. Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 4;13(1):12677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39856-2.

Abstract

Anesthesia for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and perioperative management remains a challenge. Several clinical studies indicate that opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may be beneficial, but there is no consensus on the most optimal anesthesia technique in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to assess the potential benefits and risks of intraoperative OFA compared to multimodal analgesia (MMA) with remifentanil infusion. In a prospective, randomized study, we analyzed 59 patients' data. Primary outcome measures were oxycodone consumption and reported pain scores (numerical rating scale, NRS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24th hours after surgery. Postoperative sedation on the Ramsay scale, nausea and vomiting on the PONV impact scale, desaturation episodes, pruritus, hemodynamic parameters, and hospital stay duration were also documented and compared. There were no significant differences in NRS scores or total 24-h oxycodone requirements. In the first postoperative hour, OFA group patients needed an average of 4.6 mg of oxycodone while the MMA group 7.72 mg (p = 0.008, p < 0.05 statistically significant). The PONV impact scale was significantly lower in the OFA group only in the first hour after the operation (p = 0.006). Patients in the OFA group required higher doses of ephedrine 23.67 versus 15.69 mg (p = 0.039) and more intravenous fluids 1160 versus 925.86 ml (p = 0.007). The mode of anesthesia did not affect the pain scores or the total dose of oxycodone in the first 24 postoperative hours. Only in the first postoperative hour were an opioid-sparing effect and reduction of PONV incidence seen in the OFA group when compared with remifentanil-based anesthesia. However, patients in the OFA group showed significantly greater hemodynamic lability necessitating higher vasopressor doses and more fluid volume.

摘要

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的麻醉和围手术期管理仍然是一个挑战。几项临床研究表明,无阿片麻醉(OFA)可能有益,但在临床实践中,对于最理想的麻醉技术尚无共识。我们的研究目的是评估与瑞芬太尼输注的多模式镇痛(MMA)相比,术中 OFA 的潜在益处和风险。在一项前瞻性、随机研究中,我们分析了 59 名患者的数据。主要观察指标为术后 1、6、12 和 24 小时时的氧可酮消耗量和报告的疼痛评分(数字评分量表,NRS)。还记录和比较了术后 Ramsay 镇静评分、PONV 影响评分的恶心和呕吐、脱氧发作、瘙痒、血液动力学参数和住院时间。NRS 评分或 24 小时总氧可酮需求无显著差异。在术后第一小时,OFA 组患者平均需要 4.6mg 氧可酮,而 MMA 组需要 7.72mg(p=0.008,p<0.05 有统计学意义)。只有在术后第一小时,OFA 组的 PONV 影响评分显著降低(p=0.006)。OFA 组患者需要更高剂量的麻黄碱 23.67 毫克,而 MMA 组为 15.69 毫克(p=0.039),需要更多的静脉输液 1160 毫升,而 MMA 组为 925.86 毫升(p=0.007)。麻醉方式不影响术后 24 小时内的疼痛评分或氧可酮的总剂量。只有在术后第一小时,与瑞芬太尼为基础的麻醉相比,OFA 组看到了阿片类药物节约作用和 PONV 发生率的降低。然而,OFA 组患者的血液动力学波动显著更大,需要更高剂量的血管加压药和更多的液体量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7995/10403571/c7e4425e5c41/41598_2023_39856_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验