Suppr超能文献

玻璃纤维增强临时固定义齿的承载能力评估:一项研究。

Evaluation of Load-bearing Capacity of Interim Fixed Partial Dentures Reinforced with Glass Fibers: An Study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India.

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India, Phone: +91 9994257378, e-mail:

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):390-395. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3518.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the load-bearing capacity of three and four-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) with two different designs of pontics reinforced with industrial glass fibers at two different positions of the FPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 64 samples were made with Bis-acryl composite temporary material and reinforced with industrial glass fibers (E-glass). The specimens were divided into eight groups (groups I-VIII) depending on the number of units, type of pontic design and area of placement of fibers. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate and compare the load-bearing capacity of the specimens. The evaluated data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests ( ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Three-unit interim FPD and modified ridge lap pontic design showed greater load-bearing capacity after reinforcement with glass fibers than a four-unit interim FPD and hygienic pontic design, respectively. Fiber placement at the occlusal plus connector area as well as the cervical plus connector area had comparable results.

CONCLUSION

Industrial glass fibers (E-glass) could be used as a cheaper alternative but clinical performance and their safety are yet to be evaluated.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Reinforcement with industrial-grade glass fibers can be a cheaper option for increasing the load-bearing capacity of interim partial dentures, but it needs to be studied through further studies.

摘要

目的

比较三种和四种单位固定局部义齿(FPD)在 FPD 的两个不同位置用两种不同设计的桥体增强工业玻璃纤维的承载能力。

材料和方法

用 Bis-acryl 复合临时材料和工业玻璃纤维(E-玻璃)共制作了 64 个样本。根据单位数量、桥体设计类型和纤维放置区域,将标本分为 8 组(I-VIII 组)。使用万能试验机评估和比较标本的承载能力。使用单因素方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验(≤0.05)对评估数据进行统计学分析。

结果

增强玻璃纤维后,三单位临时 FPD 和改良脊搭接桥体设计的承载能力大于四单位临时 FPD 和卫生桥体设计。在咬合加连接区域以及颈加连接区域放置纤维的结果相当。

结论

工业玻璃纤维(E-玻璃)可用作更便宜的替代品,但临床性能和安全性仍有待评估。

临床意义

用工业级玻璃纤维增强可以是增加临时局部义齿承载能力的更经济的选择,但需要通过进一步的研究来研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验