Suppr超能文献

开放式与封闭式半月板切除术。一项对比分析。

Open and closed meniscectomy. A comparative analysis.

作者信息

Simpson D A, Thomas N P, Aichroth P M

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Mar;68(2):301-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B2.3754260.

Abstract

We reviewed 230 patients an average of 34 months after they had undergone partial or total meniscectomy by surgeons of different experience in a busy unit. Open and arthroscopic meniscectomies were compared. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy resulted in a significant reduction of inpatient stay and earlier return to work and sport. Analysis of the type of meniscal damage showed that arthroscopic removal of "bucket handles" achieved better results than open techniques. Comparatively poor results were found for lateral meniscectomy.

摘要

我们回顾了230例患者,这些患者在一个繁忙科室中由不同经验的外科医生进行部分或全半月板切除术后平均34个月。对开放式和关节镜下半月板切除术进行了比较。关节镜下部分半月板切除术显著缩短了住院时间,使患者能更早重返工作和运动。对半月板损伤类型的分析表明,关节镜下切除“桶柄状”半月板比开放式手术效果更好。外侧半月板切除术的效果相对较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验