Suppr超能文献

支架盲目插入主门静脉(MPV)和支架直径是否会影响经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的手术结果?

Do the stent blind insertion into the main portal vein (MPV) and stent diameter influence the surgical outcome of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)?

机构信息

Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.

Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2023 Sep;164:107306. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107306. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

Abstract

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) surgery is a clinical intervention to treat portal hypertension (PH) by deploying a covered stent to establish a shunt path for the portal vein (PV) system, and proper surgical strategy is of great importance to balance the shunt effect and the risk of complications. To understand the clinical strategies of the stent blind insertion and stent selection in clinic, this study investigated the effects of varying stent insertion positions and diameters on the PV hemodynamics and the shunt effect by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of five post-TIPS subjects. The results showed that the successful TIPS surgeries of the five PH subjects were confirmed by quantifying their pressure drops. The stent insertion positions at the main portal vein (MPV) slightly affected the clinically concerned hemodynamic indexes (i.e., MPV pressure, stent-outlet velocity) and the shunt index (SI). This indicated that the position of the stent going into the MPV may not need to be deliberately selected. Moreover, the covered stents with 6 mm and 8 mm diameters slightly influenced the hemodynamics as well, but the large-diameter stent better improved the shunt effect compared to the small-diameter one. Despite this, the 6 mm stent was suggested thanks to the higher risk of the hepatic encephalopathy (HE) observed in clinic, which indicated the excessive shunt of the 8 mm stent. The current work revealed the effects of different TIPS strategies on the surgical outcome, and could be useful for potential clinical practices.

摘要

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种通过放置覆膜支架在门静脉(PV)系统中建立分流路径来治疗门静脉高压(PH)的临床干预措施,选择合适的手术策略对于平衡分流效果和并发症风险非常重要。为了了解临床中支架盲目插入和支架选择的策略,本研究通过对五例 TIPS 术后患者的计算流体动力学(CFD)分析,研究了不同支架插入位置和直径对 PV 血液动力学和分流效果的影响。结果表明,通过量化压力降,成功地对五例 PH 患者进行了 TIPS 手术。支架在主门静脉(MPV)中的插入位置对临床关注的血液动力学指标(即 MPV 压力、支架出口速度)和分流指数(SI)影响较小。这表明支架进入 MPV 的位置可能不需要刻意选择。此外,直径为 6mm 和 8mm 的覆膜支架对血液动力学也有轻微影响,但大直径支架比小直径支架更能改善分流效果。尽管如此,由于临床上观察到较大直径支架(8mm)的肝性脑病(HE)风险较高,因此建议使用 6mm 支架,这表明 8mm 支架的分流过度。本研究揭示了不同 TIPS 策略对手术结果的影响,可为潜在的临床实践提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验