Yang Liu, Zhang Yitao, Wang Tianqi
School of Gongli Hospital Medical Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516 Jungong Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200093, China.
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82954-y.
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely used surgery for portal hypertensive patients, whose potential postoperative complications are closely related to the hemodynamic condition of the portal venous system. The selection of shunt position in the surgery may affect the postoperative hemodynamics; however, it is difficult for clinical studies to investigate the influence. Therefore, this study aims to employ the computational model simulating TIPS to compare the hemodynamic differences resulting from different shunt positions, and also to investigate the influences of different geometrical model simplification strategies used in the TIPS simulation. For this purpose, the clinical data of two representative patients were retrospectively collected, based on which, the computational hemodynamic models of the portal venous systems after TIPS were constructed, incorporating three typical shunt positions (i.e. shunt at the left/main/right portal vein) and three types of geometrical model simplification. Results showed that among the models with different shunt positions, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were very similar, while the model with shunt at the main portal vein showed the lowest postoperative portal pressure and the smallest area of high wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcation. Among the models using different geometrical model simplification strategies, the simulated blood pressures at the main portal veins were very similar, but showed marked differences near the shunt inlets. Moreover, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were almost the same, while the velocity distributions differed a lot, leading to the different spatial distributions of wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcations and shunt walls. These results on one hand suggested that placing the shunt at the main portal vein is more beneficial for the patient; on the other hand, they proved the feasibility of utilizing simplified model to save computational cost without losing the accuracy when the pressure at the main portal vein is mainly focused on. These findings would assist clinical decision-making and promote more accurate and efficient TIPS simulations.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种广泛应用于门静脉高压患者的手术,其术后潜在并发症与门静脉系统的血流动力学状况密切相关。手术中分流位置的选择可能会影响术后血流动力学;然而,临床研究很难探究其影响。因此,本研究旨在采用模拟TIPS的计算模型,比较不同分流位置导致的血流动力学差异,并研究TIPS模拟中使用的不同几何模型简化策略的影响。为此,回顾性收集了两名代表性患者的临床数据,在此基础上构建了TIPS后门静脉系统的计算血流动力学模型,纳入三种典型分流位置(即左/主/右门静脉分流)和三种几何模型简化类型。结果表明,在不同分流位置的模型中,分流处的面积平均流速大小非常相似,而主门静脉分流的模型术后门静脉压力最低,门静脉分叉附近的高壁面切应力区域最小。在使用不同几何模型简化策略的模型中,主门静脉处的模拟血压非常相似,但在分流入口附近存在显著差异。此外,分流处的面积平均流速大小几乎相同,但速度分布差异很大,导致门静脉分叉和分流壁附近壁面切应力的空间分布不同。这些结果一方面表明将分流置于主门静脉对患者更有益;另一方面,证明了在主要关注主门静脉压力时,利用简化模型在不损失准确性的情况下节省计算成本的可行性。这些发现将有助于临床决策,并促进更准确、高效的TIPS模拟。