Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):29-36. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00708-9. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer, but is not devoid of limitations. Given the recent evolution of non-MRI imaging techniques, this critical review of the literature aimed at summarizing the available evidence on ultrasound-based and nuclear medicine imaging technologies in the initial diagnosis of PCa.
Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried for studies examining their diagnostic performance in the primary diagnosis of PCa, weighted against a histological confirmation of PCa diagnosis, using a free-text protocol. Retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) were included. Based on authors' expert opinion, studies were selected, data extracted, and results qualitatively described.
Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) appears as an appealing diagnostic strategy given its high accuracy in detection of PCa, apparently non-inferior to mpMRI. The use of multiparametric US (mpUS) likely gives an advantage in terms of effectiveness coming from the combination of different modalities, especially when certain modalities are combined. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT may represent a whole-body, one-step approach for appropriate diagnosis and staging of PCa. The direct relationship between lesions avidity of radiotracers and histopathologic and prognostic features, and its valid diagnostic performance represents appealing characteristics. However, intrinsic limits of each of these techniques exist and further research is needed before definitively considering them reliable tools for accurate PCa diagnosis. Other novel technologies, such as elastography and multiparametric US, currently relies on a limited number of studies, and therefore evidence about them remains preliminary.
Evidence on the role of non-MRI imaging options in the primary diagnosis of PCa is steadily building up. This testifies a growing interest towards novel technologies that might allow overcoming some of the limitations of current gold standard MRI imaging.
多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)提高了前列腺癌检测的诊断准确性,但并非没有局限性。鉴于最近非 MRI 成像技术的发展,对文献进行了这一关键性回顾,旨在总结超声和核医学成像技术在前列腺癌初始诊断中的现有证据。
使用自由文本协议,在三个数据库(PubMed ® 、Web of Science ™ 和 Scopus ® )中查询了检查这些技术在前列腺癌初始诊断中诊断性能的研究,将其与前列腺癌诊断的组织学确认结果进行了对比。包括回顾性和前瞻性研究、比较性和非比较性研究、系统评价(SR)和荟萃分析(MA)。根据作者的专业意见,选择了研究、提取了数据并定性描述了结果。
由于其在检测前列腺癌方面的高准确性,微超声(micro-US)似乎是一种很有吸引力的诊断策略,其似乎与 mpMRI 一样具有非劣势。使用多参数超声(mpUS)可能在不同模式的组合方面具有优势,尤其是当某些模式结合使用时。前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/CT 可能代表了一种全身一步式的方法,用于前列腺癌的适当诊断和分期。放射性示踪剂摄取与组织病理学和预后特征之间的直接关系及其有效的诊断性能是其吸引人的特点。然而,每种技术都存在内在的局限性,需要进一步的研究才能将其视为准确诊断前列腺癌的可靠工具。其他新型技术,如弹性成像和多参数超声,目前依赖于有限数量的研究,因此有关这些技术的证据仍然是初步的。
在前列腺癌的初始诊断中,非 MRI 成像选择的作用的证据正在逐渐增加。这表明人们对新技术的兴趣日益浓厚,这些新技术可能有助于克服当前金标准 MRI 成像的一些局限性。