Suppr超能文献

经会阴前列腺活检术后有无围手术期抗生素预防的感染并发症——一项系统评价,包括对所有比较研究的荟萃分析

Infectious complications following transperineal prostate biopsy with or without periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis-a systematic review including meta-analysis of all comparative studies.

作者信息

Wolff Ingmar, Büchner Markus, Hauner Katharina, Wagenlehner Florian, Burchardt Martin, Abele-Horn Marianne, Wullich Bernd, Gilfrich Christian, Pilatz Adrian, May Matthias

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Department of Urology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Dec 31. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00934-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the relatively low infection rate following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB), it remains unresolved whether periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) can be omitted. Our aim was to compare infectious complications (genitourinary infections/GUI, fever, sepsis, readmission rate, 30-day-mortality) following TPB, considering all studies of varying levels of evidence that enable a direct comparison between patients with and without PAP.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, as well as grey literature sources, to identify reports published until January 2024. All studies comparing the incidence of infectious endpoints following TPB with vs. without PAP were included in the analyses. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence for each comparison.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria involving 6520 and 5804 patients who underwent TPB with vs. without PAP, respectively. Two of the 23 studies were randomized-controlled trials, not all studies investigated all endpoints. Pooled incidences between patients with vs. without PAP for the endpoints GUI (0.50% vs. 0.37%), fever (0.44% vs. 0.26%), sepsis (0.16% vs. 0.13%), and readmission rate (0.35% vs. 0.29%) showed no significant differences (all p > 0.250). The corresponding odds ratios (including 95% confidence interval) also revealed no statistically significant differences: 1.37 (0.74-2.54) [GUI], 0.87 (0.28-2.66) [fever], 1.30 (0.46-3.67) [sepsis], and 1.45 (0.70-3.03) [readmission rate]. No study reported events regarding 30-day-mortality. In subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses, TPB without PAP showed no significantly higher complication rates regarding all analyzed endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious complications after TPB occur very rarely and cannot be further reduced by PAP. Considering the results of this systematic review and adhering to the principles of effective antibiotic stewardship, omitting PAP in the context of TPB is advisable.

摘要

背景

尽管经会阴前列腺穿刺活检(TPB)后的感染率相对较低,但围手术期抗生素预防(PAP)是否可以省略仍未得到解决。我们的目的是比较TPB后的感染并发症(泌尿生殖系统感染/GUI、发热、败血症、再入院率、30天死亡率),考虑所有不同证据水平的研究,以便能够直接比较接受和未接受PAP的患者。

方法

我们在PubMed/Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库以及灰色文献来源中进行了全面搜索,以识别截至2024年1月发表的报告。所有比较TPB后接受与未接受PAP的感染终点发生率的研究都纳入了分析。采用GRADE方法评估每次比较的证据确定性。

结果

23项研究符合纳入标准,分别涉及6520例和5804例接受TPB并接受与未接受PAP的患者。23项研究中有两项是随机对照试验,并非所有研究都调查了所有终点。接受与未接受PAP的患者在GUI(0.50%对0.37%)、发热(0.44%对0.26%)、败血症(0.16%对0.13%)和再入院率(0.35%对0.29%)终点的合并发生率无显著差异(所有p>0.250)。相应的优势比(包括95%置信区间)也未显示出统计学上的显著差异:1.37(0.74 - 2.54)[GUI],0.87(0.28 - 2.66)[发热],1.30(0.46 - 3.67)[败血症],以及1.45(0.70 - 3.03)[再入院率]。没有研究报告30天死亡率相关事件。在亚组分析和敏感性分析中,未接受PAP的TPB在所有分析终点方面均未显示出显著更高的并发症发生率。

结论

TPB后的感染并发症非常罕见,PAP无法进一步降低其发生率。考虑到本系统评价的结果并遵循有效的抗生素管理原则,在TPB的情况下省略PAP是可取的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验