School of Psychology, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK; Miles Dyslexia Centre, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK.
Miles Dyslexia Centre, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK; School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Dec;236:105756. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105756. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
Recent research suggests that handwriting comprises two separate subskills: legibility and fluency. It remains unclear, however, how these subskills differ in their relationship to other abilities associated with handwriting, including spelling, graphomotor, and selective attention skills. In this study, we sought to examine the extent and nature of concurrent relationships that may exist among these skills. Children in Year 3 (n = 293), Year 4 (n = 291), and Year 5 (n = 283) completed a large, group-administered battery to assess each of the above skills. Using multigroup structural equation modeling, we found that spelling, graphomotor, and selective attention skills together explained a moderate amount of variance in handwriting legibility (R = .37-.42) and fluency (R = .41-.58) and that these subskills differed in their concurrent relations. Graphomotor skills accounted for a relatively greater proportion of variance in legibility than did spelling. Conversely, there were relatively stronger contributions from variations in spelling ability to variations in fluency than from graphomotor skills. Furthermore, selective attention predicted handwriting fluency only, and it partially mediated the influence of graphomotor skills. This study further demonstrates that handwriting legibility and fluency are separable and complex skills, each differentially related to spelling, graphomotor, and attentional abilities even during later primary school years.
最近的研究表明,手写包含两个独立的子技能:清晰度和流畅度。然而,这些子技能与手写相关的其他能力(包括拼写、动作技能和选择性注意技能)之间的关系如何,目前还不清楚。在这项研究中,我们试图研究这些技能之间可能存在的并发关系的程度和性质。三年级(n=293)、四年级(n=291)和五年级(n=283)的儿童完成了一项大型的、团体管理的电池测试,以评估上述每种技能。使用多组结构方程模型,我们发现拼写、动作技能和选择性注意技能共同解释了手写清晰度(R=.37-.42)和流畅度(R=.41-.58)的中等程度的差异,并且这些子技能在并发关系上存在差异。动作技能对清晰度的解释程度相对大于拼写。相反,拼写能力的变化对流畅度的变化有相对更强的贡献,而不是动作技能。此外,选择性注意仅预测手写流畅度,并且它部分中介了动作技能的影响。这项研究进一步表明,手写清晰度和流畅度是可分离的复杂技能,即使在小学后期,它们与拼写、动作技能和注意力能力的关系也各不相同。