Suppr超能文献

住院治疗心力衰竭的 Medicare 受益人在未使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的情况下使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的对比结局。

Comparative Outcomes of Sacubitril/Valsartan Use After Hospitalization for Heart Failure Among Medicare Beneficiaries Naïve to Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 1;204:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.099. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis). However, data on postdischarge outcomes in renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)-naïve patients are limited. We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and June 2019, had part D prescription coverage, and were not on RASi therapy during the 6 months before hospital admission. We examined the associations between sacubitril/valsartan prescription at hospital discharge and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after discharge using overlap-weighted median regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The end points included "home time" (defined as days alive and out of any health care institution), mortality, and rehospitalization. Among 3,572 patients with HFrEF and who are naïve to RASi therapy, at discharge, 290 (8.1%) were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan and 1,390 (38.9%) were prescribed ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan had a longer median home time (parameter estimate 27.0 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.40 to 41.6, p <0.001) and lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91, p = 0.004) at 1 year than patients not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan. The prescription of sacubitril/valsartan was not significantly associated with all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03, p = 0.10) or heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.07, p = 0.19). In a restricted comparison of patients discharged on sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers, there were no significant differences in the outcomes. In conclusion, in this contemporary population of RASi-naïve patients with HFrEF from routine clinical practice, compared with not initiating, the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was associated with longer home time and improvements in overall survival.

摘要

沙库巴曲缬沙坦可改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的预后,优于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)。然而,肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)初治患者出院后结局的数据有限。我们纳入了 2015 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月在 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 登记处因 HFrEF 住院的年龄≥65 岁的 Medicare 受益人群,这些患者有部分 D 处方覆盖,且在入院前 6 个月内未接受 RASi 治疗。我们使用重叠加权中位数回归和 Cox 比例风险模型,检验了出院时开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦与出院后 30 天和 1 年时结局之间的关联。终点包括“在家时间”(定义为存活且不在任何医疗机构的天数)、死亡率和再住院率。在 3572 例 RASi 初治的 HFrEF 患者中,出院时开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦的患者有 290 例(8.1%),开具 ACEi 和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的患者有 1390 例(38.9%)。在调整了基线特征后,与未开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦的患者相比,开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦的患者中位在家时间更长(参数估计值 27.0 天,95%置信区间[CI] 12.40 至 41.6,p<0.001),1 年时全因死亡率更低(风险比[HR] 0.74,95%CI 0.61 至 0.91,p=0.004)。开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦与全因再住院率(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.74 至 1.03,p=0.10)或心力衰竭再住院率(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.70 至 1.07,p=0.19)无显著相关性。在对出院时开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦与 ACEi 和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的患者进行的受限比较中,结局无显著差异。总之,在这项来自常规临床实践的 RASi 初治 HFrEF 患者的当代人群中,与未起始治疗相比,出院时起始沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗与更长的在家时间和整体生存改善相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验