Suppr超能文献

基于 PCR 的血培养检测对产 ESBL 肠杆菌科的早期检测的临床影响。

The clinical impact of early detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales with PCR-based blood culture assays.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Northwell Health Laboratories, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2024 Jan;52(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Starting January 4, 2021, our health system core microbiology laboratory changed blood culture identification (BCID) platforms to ePlex BCID from BioFire BCID1 with the additional capability to detect the bla gene of ESBL-producing organisms. Clinical outcomes of ESBL bloodstream infections (BSI) after implementing ePlex BCID were unknown.

METHODS

Patients with ESBL BSI were compared pre and postimplementation of ePlex BCID in this 11-hospital retrospective analysis (BioFire BCID1 in 2019 vs ePlex BCID in 2021). The primary outcome was time from the Gram stain result to escalation to a carbapenem. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS), and the duration of antimicrobial therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients were analyzed. The median time of Gram stain result to escalation to carbapenem was reduced from 44.5 hours with BioFire BCID1 to 7.9 hours with ePlex BCID (P < .001). There were no significant differences in mortality, 30-day readmission, or LOS. The duration of antimicrobial therapy for ESBL BSI was lower in the ePlex BCID group (from 14.4 days to 12.7 days, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Timely detection of the bla gene by BCID provides valuable information for the early initiation of appropriate and effective antimicrobial therapy. Although it was not associated with lower mortality, 30-day readmission, or LOS, it may have benefits such as decreasing antimicrobial exposure to patients.

摘要

背景

自 2021 年 1 月 4 日起,我们的医疗系统核心微生物实验室将血培养鉴定(BCID)平台从 BioFire BCID1 更改为 ePlex BCID,并增加了检测产 ESBL 生物体 bla 基因的能力。在实施 ePlex BCID 后,ESBL 血流感染(BSI)的临床结果尚不清楚。

方法

在这项 11 家医院的回顾性分析中(2019 年使用 BioFire BCID1,2021 年使用 ePlex BCID),比较了 ESBL BSI 患者在实施 ePlex BCID 前后的情况。主要结局是从革兰氏染色结果到升级为碳青霉烯类药物的时间。次要结局包括院内死亡率、30 天再入院率、住院时间(LOS)和抗菌治疗持续时间。

结果

共分析了 275 例患者。从革兰氏染色结果到升级为碳青霉烯类药物的中位时间从使用 BioFire BCID1 的 44.5 小时缩短至使用 ePlex BCID 的 7.9 小时(P<.001)。死亡率、30 天再入院率或 LOS 无显著差异。ESBL BSI 的抗菌治疗时间在 ePlex BCID 组较低(从 14.4 天减少到 12.7 天,P=.014)。

结论

BCID 及时检测 bla 基因可为早期开始适当和有效的抗菌治疗提供有价值的信息。尽管它与较低的死亡率、30 天再入院率或 LOS 无关,但它可能具有减少患者抗菌暴露等益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验