• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 ePlex 血培养鉴定板对实验室影响的深入观察:利用快速分子检测对阳性血培养物的工作流程分析。

A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown Universitygrid.40263.33, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0179622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01796-22. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01796-22
PMID:36069598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9602361/
Abstract

Rapid identification of pathogens is critical in bloodstream infections. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and the adoption of the ePlex system into the clinical laboratory workflow. Nonduplicate remnant specimens of positive blood cultures were prospectively tested using ePlex panels between January and March 2020. A total of 313 unique positive blood culture specimens were tested. The identified organisms consisted of 98 Gram-negative rods (GNR), 90 Gram-positive cocci (GPC) in clusters, 62 GPC in chains, 21 Gram-positive rods, and 20 yeasts; 22 organisms were off panel. The positive percent agreement was 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution, while the negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. The ePlex BCID panels accurately detected 5 pan targets and 42 antimicrobial resistance gene markers, including 31 , 4 , 6 CTX-M, and 1 KPC gene. The median times to result were calculated as 2.5 h for Xpert MRSA/SA in GPC in clusters, 9.5 h for Accelerate Pheno (identification and susceptibility) in GNR, 6 h for peptide nucleic acid fluorescent hybridization [PNA-FISH] in yeasts, 27 h for the latex agglutination test in S. aureus, 29 h for Lancefield serotyping in GPC in chains, and 29 h for Vitek-MS in GNR. In our laboratory, the ePlex panels could substantially reduce the time to result for bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Candida spp. The highly accurate ePlex panels can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid identification of the causative agent is of critical importance for the prompt initiation of the appropriate antibiotic treatment. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and their adoption into the clinical laboratory workflow. We prospectively tested 313 blood culture isolates and found that ePlex BCID panels had a positive percent agreement of 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution. The negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. This new rapid technology (turnaround time of ~90 min) can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. Adoption should be individualized based on the needs of the patient population and capabilities of the laboratory.

摘要

快速鉴定血流感染中的病原体至关重要。我们评估了 GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定(BCID)板的诊断性能,以及将 ePlex 系统引入临床实验室工作流程的情况。2020 年 1 月至 3 月,前瞻性地使用 ePlex 板检测了非重复的阳性血培养剩余标本。共检测了 313 个独特的阳性血培养标本。鉴定出的生物体包括 98 个革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNR)、90 个革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)簇、62 个 GPC 链、21 个革兰氏阳性杆菌和 20 个酵母;22 个生物体不在板上。经过不一致性解决后,所有测试生物体的阳性符合率均为 100%,而所有靶标(除棒状杆菌属外)的阴性符合率均为 100%,棒状杆菌属的阴性符合率为 99.7%。ePlex BCID 板准确地检测到 5 个 pan 靶标和 42 个抗菌药物耐药基因标记物,包括 31 个 CTX-M 和 1 个 KPC 基因。结果的中位时间计算为:Xpert MRSA/SA 在 GPC 簇中的时间为 2.5 小时,Accelerate Pheno(鉴定和药敏)在 GNR 中的时间为 9.5 小时,肽核酸荧光杂交[PNA-FISH]在酵母中的时间为 6 小时,乳胶凝集试验在金黄色葡萄球菌中的时间为 27 小时,Lancefield 血清分型在 GPC 链中的时间为 29 小时,Vitek-MS 在 GNR 中的时间为 29 小时。在我们的实验室中,ePlex 板可以显著缩短由链球菌属、肠球菌属和假丝酵母菌属引起的血流感染(BSI)的结果时间。高度准确的 ePlex 板有助于简化血液工作台工作流程中的实验室效率,减少鉴定 BSI 病原体的结果时间。败血症是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。快速鉴定病原体对于及时启动适当的抗生素治疗至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了 GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定(BCID)板的诊断性能及其在临床实验室工作流程中的应用。我们前瞻性地检测了 313 个血培养分离株,发现 ePlex BCID 板在解决不一致性后,所有测试生物体的阳性符合率均为 100%。除棒状杆菌属外,所有靶标的阴性符合率均为 100%,棒状杆菌属的阴性符合率为 99.7%。这种新的快速技术(~90 分钟的周转时间)可以帮助简化血液工作台工作流程中的实验室效率,减少鉴定 BSI 病原体的结果时间。应根据患者人群的需求和实验室的能力个体化采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/c07c024c57ff/spectrum.01796-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/cddb468a4327/spectrum.01796-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/69b5ff63cd0e/spectrum.01796-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/c07c024c57ff/spectrum.01796-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/cddb468a4327/spectrum.01796-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/69b5ff63cd0e/spectrum.01796-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3490/9602361/c07c024c57ff/spectrum.01796-22-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures.利用 ePlex 血培养鉴定板对实验室影响的深入观察:利用快速分子检测对阳性血培养物的工作流程分析。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0179622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01796-22. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel.新型GenMark Dx ePlex血培养鉴定革兰氏阳性菌检测板的临床性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01730-19.
3
Accuracy of Broad-Panel PCR-Based Bacterial Identification for Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Oncology Population.广谱 PCR 检测在儿科肿瘤人群血培养中的细菌鉴定准确性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0022121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00221-21. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections.评估 ePlex 血培养鉴定板在检测血流感染病原体中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01597-18. Print 2019 Feb.
5
The clinical impact of implementing GenMark ePlex blood culture panels for around-the-clock blood culture identification; a prospective observational study.实施 GenMark ePlex 血培养板进行 24 小时血培养鉴定的临床影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Oct;52(10):705-712. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1775882. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.一项多中心临床研究,旨在验证 GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定革兰氏阴性菌 panel 的诊断准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0248420. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02484-20.
7
Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定革兰氏阴性面板的测试性能和潜在临床应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0409222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04092-22. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
8
Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia.ePlex血培养鉴定板对菌血症和真菌血症快速诊断的微生物学性能及潜在临床影响评估
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Nov 26;10:594951. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594951. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparing the Clinical Utility of Rapid Diagnostics for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Using Desirability of Outcome Ranking Approach for the Management of Antibiotic Therapy (DOOR-MAT).使用管理抗生素治疗的结果偏好排序方法(DOOR-MAT)比较快速诊断在治疗血流感染中的临床实用性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e0044121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00441-21.
10
The clinical impact of early detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales with PCR-based blood culture assays.基于 PCR 的血培养检测对产 ESBL 肠杆菌科的早期检测的临床影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2024 Jan;52(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis.紧跟前沿:脓毒症中快速病原体及抗菌药物耐药性诊断
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091824.
2
Misidentification and misreporting of antibiotic resistance in bacteremia by blood culture molecular identification panels.血培养分子鉴定试剂盒在菌血症中对抗生素耐药性的鉴定和报告错误。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0054224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00542-24. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel.血培养中致病微生物和抗菌药物耐药性标志物的快速分子检测:下一代 FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 试剂盒的评估与应用。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;41(3):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04314-2. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.一项多中心临床研究,旨在验证 GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定革兰氏阴性菌 panel 的诊断准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0248420. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02484-20.
3
ePlex® 血培养鉴定试剂盒在快速诊断血流感染中的临床影响和成本-效果分析:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;43(6):1193-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04820-z. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases in non-neutropenic ICU patients, with focus on candidiasis and aspergillosis: a comprehensive review.非中性粒细胞减少症 ICU 患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断与治疗,重点关注念珠菌病和曲霉病:全面综述。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Mar 5;14:1256158. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1256158. eCollection 2024.
Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia.ePlex血培养鉴定板对菌血症和真菌血症快速诊断的微生物学性能及潜在临床影响评估
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Nov 26;10:594951. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594951. eCollection 2020.
4
Multicenter Evaluation of a PCR-Based Digital Microfluidics and Electrochemical Detection System for the Rapid Identification of 15 Fungal Pathogens Directly from Positive Blood Cultures.基于聚合酶链反应的数字微流控和电化学检测系统用于直接从阳性血培养物中快速鉴定15种真菌病原体的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02096-19.
5
Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel.新型GenMark Dx ePlex血培养鉴定革兰氏阳性菌检测板的临床性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01730-19.
6
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
7
Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BioFire® FilmArray® 脑膜炎/脑炎检测试剂盒的诊断试验准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Mar;26(3):281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Opportunities Revealed for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Clinical Practice with Implementation of a Rapid Respiratory Multiplex Assay.快速呼吸道多重检测试剂盒的应用为抗菌药物管理和临床实践带来了机遇。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00861-19. Print 2019 Oct.
9
Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections.评估 ePlex 血培养鉴定板在检测血流感染病原体中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01597-18. Print 2019 Feb.
10
The Cost-Effectiveness of Rapid Diagnostic Testing for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections with or without Antimicrobial Stewardship.快速诊断检测在有或没有抗菌药物管理的情况下用于诊断血流感染的成本效益。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 May 30;31(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00095-17. Print 2018 Jul.