Suppr超能文献

在一个欧洲大都市地区,对穿透性胸部损伤的院前治疗的结果和改进的可能性:2009-2017 年的回顾性分析。

Outcomes and potential for improvement in the prehospital treatment of penetrating chest injuries in a European metropolitan area: A retrospective analysis of 2009 - 2017.

机构信息

Emergency Medical Service Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Dept. of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Jan;55(1):110971. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110971. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients <45 years living in high-resource settings. However, penetrating chest injuries are still relatively rare in Europe - with an upwards trend. These cases are of particular interest to emergency medical services (EMS) due to available invasive treatment options like chest tube placement or resuscitative thoracotomy. To date, there is no sufficient data from Austria regarding penetrating chest trauma in a metropolitan area, and no reliable source to base decisions regarding further skill proficiency training on.

METHODS

For this retrospective observational study, we screened all trauma emergency responses of the Viennese EMS between 01/2009 and 12/2017 and included all those with a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score ≥ IV (= potentially life-threatening). Data were derived from EMS mission documentations and hospital files, and for those cases with the injuries leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), we assessed the EMS cardiac arrest registry and consulted a forensic physician.

RESULTS

We included 480 cases of penetrating chest injuries of NACA IV-VII (83% male, 64% > 30 years old, 74% stab wounds, 16% cuts, 8% gunshot wounds, 56% inflicted by another party, 26% self-inflicted, 18% unknown). In the study period, the incidence rose from 1.4/100,000 to 3.5/100,000 capita, and overall, about one case was treated per week. In the cases with especially severe injury patterns (= NACA V-VII, 43% of total), (tension-)pneumothorax was the most common injury (29%). The highest mortality was seen in injuries to pulmonary vessels (100%) or the heart (94%). Fifty-eight patients (12% of total) deceased, whereas in 15 cases, the forensic physician stated survival could theoretically have been possible. However, only five of these CPR patients received at least unilateral thoracostomy. Regarding all penetrating chest injuries, thoracostomy had only been performed in eight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe cases of penetrating chest trauma are rare in Vienna and happened about once a week between 2009 and 2017. Both incidence and case load increased over the years, and potentially life-saving invasive procedures were only reluctantly applied. Therefore, a structured educational and skill retention approach aimed at both paramedics and emergency physicians should be implemented.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective analysis without intervention.

摘要

背景

在资源丰富的环境中,创伤是 45 岁以下患者死亡的主要原因。然而,在欧洲,穿透性胸部损伤仍然相对较少——呈上升趋势。由于存在胸管放置或抢救性开胸等可供选择的侵入性治疗方法,这些病例对紧急医疗服务(EMS)特别感兴趣。迄今为止,奥地利尚无大都市地区穿透性胸部创伤的充分数据,也没有可靠的信息来源来确定进一步的技能熟练程度培训。

方法

在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们筛选了维也纳 EMS 2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间所有的创伤急救响应,并纳入了所有 NACA 评分≥IV(=可能危及生命)的患者。数据来自 EMS 任务记录和医院档案,对于那些导致心肺复苏(CPR)的损伤病例,我们评估了 EMS 心脏骤停登记处并咨询了法医。

结果

我们纳入了 480 例 NACA IV-VII 级的穿透性胸部损伤(83%为男性,64%>30 岁,74%为刺伤,16%为切割伤,8%为枪伤,56%为第三方造成,26%为自我造成,18%原因不明)。在研究期间,发病率从 1.4/100,000 上升至 3.5/100,000 人,总体而言,每周大约治疗一例。在那些损伤模式特别严重的病例中(= NACA V-VII,占总数的 43%),(张力)气胸是最常见的损伤(29%)。肺部血管(100%)或心脏(94%)损伤的死亡率最高。58 名患者(占总数的 12%)死亡,而在 15 例中,法医表示理论上可能存活。然而,只有 5 例 CPR 患者接受了至少单侧胸腔引流。对于所有穿透性胸部损伤,仅对 8 例患者进行了胸腔引流。

结论

维也纳严重的穿透性胸部创伤病例罕见,2009 年至 2017 年期间每周发生一例。发病率和病例数多年来都有所增加,而且勉强应用了潜在的救生性侵入性治疗。因此,应针对护理人员和急诊医生实施一种结构化的教育和技能保留方法。

试验注册

回顾性无干预分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验