Yang Dalin, Ghafoor Usman, Eggebrecht Adam Thomas, Hong Keum-Shik
School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea.
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63100 USA.
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2023 Aug 2;11(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s13755-023-00233-y. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) exhibits the capability to interact with endogenous brain oscillations using an external low-intensity sinusoidal current and influences cerebral function. Despite its potential benefits, the physiological mechanisms and effectiveness of tACS are currently a subject of debate and disagreement. The aims of our study are to (i) evaluate the neurological and behavioral impact of tACS by conducting repetitive sham-controlled experiments and (ii) propose criteria to evaluate effectiveness, which can serve as a benchmark to determine optimal individual-based tACS protocols. In this study, 15 healthy adults participated in the experiment over two visiting: sham and tACS (i.e., 5 Hz, 1 mA). During each visit, we used multimodal recordings of the participants' brain, including simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), along with a working memory (WM) score to quantify neurological effects and cognitive changes immediately after each repetitive sham/tACS session. Our results indicate increased WM scores, hemodynamic response strength, and EEG power in theta and delta bands both during and after the tACS period. Additionally, the observed effects do not increase with prolonged stimulation time, as the effects plateau towards the end of the experiment. In conclusion, our proposed closed-loop scheme offers a promising advance for evaluating the effectiveness of tACS during the stimulation session. Specifically, the assessment criteria use participant-specific brain-based signals along with a behavioral output. Moreover, we propose a feedback efficacy score that can aid in determining the optimal stimulation duration based on a participant-specific brain state, thereby preventing the risk of overstimulation.
经颅交流电刺激(tACS)具有利用外部低强度正弦电流与内源性脑振荡相互作用并影响脑功能的能力。尽管它有潜在的益处,但tACS的生理机制和有效性目前仍是一个存在争议的话题。我们研究的目的是:(i)通过进行重复性假对照实验来评估tACS对神经和行为的影响;(ii)提出评估有效性的标准,该标准可作为确定基于个体的最佳tACS方案的基准。在本研究中,15名健康成年人分两次就诊参与实验:假刺激和tACS(即5赫兹,1毫安)。在每次就诊期间,我们对参与者的大脑进行多模态记录,包括同步脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS),并使用工作记忆(WM)评分来量化每次重复性假刺激/tACS session后立即产生的神经效应和认知变化。我们的结果表明,在tACS期间及之后,WM评分、血流动力学反应强度以及theta和delta波段的EEG功率均增加。此外,观察到的效应不会随着刺激时间的延长而增加,因为在实验接近尾声时效应趋于平稳。总之,我们提出的闭环方案为评估tACS在刺激过程中的有效性提供了一个有前景的进展。具体而言,评估标准使用基于参与者个体大脑的信号以及行为输出。此外,我们提出了一种反馈效能评分,它可以帮助根据参与者个体的脑状态确定最佳刺激持续时间,从而防止过度刺激的风险。