Suppr超能文献

在健康受试者中,经颅直流电刺激和交流电刺激的电生理效应的直接比较。

A direct comparison of the electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation in healthy subjects.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Cognitive Science Research, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2020 Nov 15;1747:147065. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147065. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the clinical effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), the comparability of these interventions in neurophysiological aspects have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, we aimed to directly compare the electrophysiological effects of single-session tDCS and gamma-tACS in healthy subjects, matching the intervention protocol as closely as possible.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blinded, and active-controlled study. Sixty healthy college students were enrolled in the study. Both tACS with, at 40 Hz frequency, and tDCS have the same current intensity (2 mA, 30 min) within the same target area (right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded before and after single-session stimulation.

RESULTS

Significant differences in theta, alpha, low-beta, and gamma frequencies were found between tDCS, tACS, and the sham groups. Low-beta source activity of the middle temporal gyrus was decreased only after an intervention with tACS.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that tDCS and tACS resulted in an increased range of frequency activity, including slow- and fast-wave bands. Specifically, tDCS modulates the frontal region, while tACS modulates neural oscillations at the fronto-central, parietal, and temporal areas. The tACS also decreased low-beta source activity in the middle temporal gyrus. Identifying the common and unique EEG patterns of tDCS and tACS may help shed light on their potential clinical benefits and distinctive neuropathology in various clinical symptoms.

摘要

目的

尽管经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS)具有临床疗效,但这两种干预措施在神经生理方面的可比性尚未得到彻底研究。因此,我们旨在直接比较单次 tDCS 和伽马-tACS 在健康受试者中的电生理效应,尽可能匹配干预方案。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、阳性对照研究。60 名健康大学生被纳入研究。tACS 采用 40Hz 频率,tDCS 的电流强度相同(2mA,30 分钟),作用于相同的靶区(右侧和左侧背外侧前额叶皮层)。在单次刺激前后记录静息状态脑电图(EEG)。

结果

tDCS、tACS 和假刺激组之间在θ、α、低β和γ频率上存在显著差异。仅在 tACS 干预后,中颞叶的低β源活动减少。

结论

本研究表明,tDCS 和 tACS 导致了频率活动范围的增加,包括慢波和快波波段。具体来说,tDCS 调节额叶区域,而 tACS 调节额-中央、顶叶和颞叶区域的神经振荡。tACS 还降低了中颞叶的低β源活动。确定 tDCS 和 tACS 的共同和独特的 EEG 模式可能有助于阐明它们在各种临床症状中的潜在临床益处和独特的神经病理学。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验