Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dinfectome Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jul 21;13:1200157. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1200157. eCollection 2023.
Pneumoconiosis patients have a high prevalence of pulmonary infections, which can complicate diagnosis and treatment. And there is no comprehensive study of the microbiome of patients with pneumoconiosis. The application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) fills the gap to some extent by analyzing the lung microbiota of pneumoconiosis population while achieving accurate diagnosis.
We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients with suspected pneumoconiosis complicated with pulmonary infection between Jan 2020 and Nov 2022. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens from 44 patients were collected and tested using the mNGS technology.
Among the lung microbiome of pneumoconiosis patients with complicated pulmonary infection (P group), the most frequently detected bacteria and fungi at the genus level were and , at the species level were and , respectively, and the most frequently detected DNA virus was . There was no significant difference in α diversity between the P group and the non-pneumoconiosis patients complicated with pulmonary infection group (Non-P group) in pulmonary flora, while 0.01 for β diversity analysis, and the differential species between the two groups were and . In addition, we monitored a high distribution of and in the P group, while herpes virus was detected in the majority of samples.
Overall, we not only revealed a comprehensive lung microbiome profile of pneumoconiosis patients, but also compared the differences between their microbiome and that of non-pneumoconiosis complicated with pulmonary infection patients. This provides a good basis for a better understanding of the relationship between pneumoconiosis and microorganisms, and for the search of potential biomarkers.
尘肺病患者肺部感染的患病率较高,这可能使诊断和治疗变得复杂。目前还没有对尘肺病患者微生物组的全面研究。宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)的应用通过分析尘肺人群的肺部微生物群,在实现准确诊断的同时,在一定程度上填补了这一空白。
我们回顾性分析了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 11 月期间 44 例疑似尘肺合并肺部感染的患者。收集 44 例患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)标本,采用 mNGS 技术进行检测。
在合并肺部感染的尘肺病患者(P 组)的肺部微生物组中,属水平最常检测到的细菌和真菌分别为 和 ,种水平最常检测到的细菌和真菌分别为 和 ,最常检测到的 DNA 病毒为 。在肺部菌群方面,P 组与非尘肺合并肺部感染组(非 P 组)之间的α多样性无显著差异,而β多样性分析差异有统计学意义(P=0.01),两组之间的差异种为 和 。此外,我们监测到 P 组中 和 的分布较高,而疱疹病毒在大多数样本中均被检出。
综上所述,我们不仅揭示了尘肺病患者全面的肺部微生物组谱,还比较了他们的微生物组与非尘肺合并肺部感染患者的微生物组之间的差异。这为更好地了解尘肺病与微生物之间的关系以及寻找潜在的生物标志物提供了良好的基础。