Fernandes Tiago Lazzaretti, Souza Michel Oliveira, Albuquerque Cyro, Araujo Paulo Henrique, Pedrinelli Andre, Hernandez Arnaldo José
Universidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia IOT HCFMUSP, Grupo de Medicina Esportiva, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Jul 31;31(4):e268195. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233104e268195. eCollection 2023.
To compare anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between two tunnel positions in knees with isolated ligament tears.
Anatomic ACL reconstruction was performed, from hip-to-toe, on 15 fresh cadaveric specimens. No associated lesions were created to enhance knee instability. The protocol was conducted in three states: (1) complete isolated ACL deficiency; (2) anatomic femoral and tibial anteromedial ACL reconstruction (AM REC); and (3) anatomic femoral and tibial central ACL reconstruction (Central REC). The reconstruction protocols were randomly assigned. The continuous mechanized pivot-shift test was recorded dynamically with a tracking system.
The Central REC group showed a smaller degree of internal rotation (0.6° ± 0.3° vs. 1.8° ± 0.3°, respectively, P < 0.05) and no difference in anterior translation (4.7 mm ± 0.4 mm vs. 4.5 mm ± 0.4 mm, respectively, P > 0.05) in the pivot-shift test, compared with the AM REC group.
The central anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in greater restriction of internal rotation than the anteromedial anatomic ACL reconstruction.
比较在单纯韧带撕裂的膝关节中,两个隧道位置的解剖学前交叉韧带(ACL)重建效果。
对15个新鲜尸体标本从髋部到脚趾进行解剖学ACL重建。未制造相关损伤以增强膝关节不稳定性。实验方案分三种状态进行:(1)单纯ACL完全缺失;(2)解剖学股骨和胫骨前内侧ACL重建(AM REC);(3)解剖学股骨和胫骨中央ACL重建(Central REC)。重建方案随机分配。使用跟踪系统动态记录连续机械性轴移试验。
与AM REC组相比,Central REC组在轴移试验中内旋程度较小(分别为0.6°±0.3°和1.8°±0.3°,P<0.05),前向平移无差异(分别为4.7 mm±0.4 mm和4.5 mm±0.4 mm,P>0.05)。
中央解剖学ACL重建比前内侧解剖学ACL重建导致更大程度的内旋受限。