La Grasta Sabolic Lavinia, Pozgaj Sepec Marija, Valent Moric Bernardica, Cigrovski Berkovic Maja
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Centre Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
School of Medicine, Catholic University, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
World J Diabetes. 2023 Jul 15;14(7):1126-1136. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i7.1126.
An association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and insulin resistance in obese adolescents, especially in those with various obesity categories, has not been systematically studied. There is a lack of knowledge about the effects of CRF on insulin resistance in severely obese adolescents, despite their continuous rise.
To investigate the association between CRF and insulin resistance in obese adolescents, with special emphasis on severely obese adolescents.
We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study that included 200 pubertal adolescents, 10 years to 18 years of age, who were referred to a tertiary care center due to obesity. According to body mass index (BMI), adolescents were classified as mildly obese (BMI 100% to 120% of the 95 percentile for age and sex) or severely obese (BMI ≥ 120% of the 95 percentile for age and sex or ≥ 35 kg/m, whichever was lower). Participant body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. Maximal oxygen uptake (VOmax) was determined from submaximal treadmill exercise test. CRF was expressed as VOmax scaled by total body weight (TBW) (mL/min/kg TBW) or by fat free mass (FFM) (mL/min/kg FFM), and then categorized as poor, intermediate, or good, according to VOmax terciles. Data were analyzed by statistical software package SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0). < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A weak negative correlation between CRF and HOMA-IR was found [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient () = -0.28, < 0.01 for CRF; () = -0.21, < 0.01 for CRF]. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant main effect of CRF on HOMA-IR [F = 6.840, = 0.001 for CRF; F = 3.883, = 0.022 for CRF]. Subsequent analyses showed that obese adolescents with poor CRF had higher HOMA-IR than obese adolescents with good CRF ( = 0.001 for CRF; = 0.018 for CRF). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction confirmed significant effect of interaction of CRF level and obesity category on HOMA-IR [F = 3.292, = 0.039 for CRF]. Severely obese adolescents had higher HOMA-IR than those who were mildly obese, with either good or poor CRF. However, HOMA-IR did not differ between severely obese adolescents with good and mildly obese adolescents with poor CRF.
CRF is an important determinant of insulin resistance in obese adolescents, regardless of obesity category. Therefore, CRF assessment should be a part of diagnostic procedure, and its improvement should be a therapeutic goal.
肥胖青少年,尤其是不同肥胖类型的青少年,其心肺适能(CRF)与胰岛素抵抗之间的关联尚未得到系统研究。尽管重度肥胖青少年的数量持续增加,但目前对于CRF对其胰岛素抵抗的影响仍缺乏了解。
探讨肥胖青少年,尤其是重度肥胖青少年中CRF与胰岛素抵抗之间的关联。
我们进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,纳入了200名10至18岁的青春期肥胖青少年,这些青少年因肥胖被转诊至三级医疗中心。根据体重指数(BMI),青少年被分为轻度肥胖(BMI为年龄和性别的95百分位数的100%至120%)或重度肥胖(BMI为年龄和性别的95百分位数的≥120%或≥35kg/m²,以较低者为准)。通过生物电阻抗分析评估参与者的身体成分。计算胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估值(HOMA-IR)。通过次极量跑步机运动试验测定最大摄氧量(VO₂max)。CRF以每千克总体重(TBW)(mL/min/kg TBW)或每千克去脂体重(FFM)(mL/min/kg FFM)的VO₂max表示,然后根据VO₂max三分位数分为差、中、好三类。使用统计软件包SPSS(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,版本24.0)进行数据分析。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
发现CRF与HOMA-IR之间存在弱负相关[Spearman等级相关系数(rs)=-0.28,CRF的P < 0.01;rs = -0.21,CRF的P < 0.01]。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)显示CRF对HOMA-IR有显著的主效应[F = 6.840,CRF的P = 0.001;F = 3.883,CRF的P = 0.022]。随后的分析表明,CRF差的肥胖青少年的HOMA-IR高于CRF好的肥胖青少年(CRF的P = 0.001;CRF的P = 0.018)。经Bonferroni校正的双因素ANOVA证实CRF水平与肥胖类型的交互作用对HOMA-IR有显著影响[F = 3.292,CRF的P = 0.039]。重度肥胖青少年的HOMA-IR高于轻度肥胖青少年,无论其CRF是好还是差。然而,CRF好的重度肥胖青少年与CRF差的轻度肥胖青少年之间的HOMA-IR没有差异。
无论肥胖类型如何,CRF都是肥胖青少年胰岛素抵抗的重要决定因素。因此,CRF评估应成为诊断程序的一部分,改善CRF应成为治疗目标。