Brown Mika, Zhu Shirley, Taylor Lorne, Tabrizian Maryam, Li-Jessen Nicole Y K
Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 1003, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology 2001 McGill College Ave, 8th Floor, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Adv Nanobiomed Res. 2023 Apr;3(4). doi: 10.1002/anbr.202200095. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) is a promising material for tissue engineering applications. Tissue-specific dECM is often seen as a favorable material that recapitulates a native-like microenvironment for cellular remodeling. However, the minute quantity of dECM derivable from small organs like the vocal fold (VF) hampers manufacturing scalability. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS), a commercial product with proven regenerative capacity, may be a viable option for VF applications. This study aims to compare dECM hydrogels derived from SIS or VF tissue with respect to protein content and functionality using mass spectrometry-based proteomics and in vitro studies. Proteomic analysis reveals that VF and SIS dECM share 75% of core matrisome proteins. Although VF dECM proteins have greater overlap with native VF, SIS dECM shows less cross-sample variability. Following decellularization, significant reductions of soluble collagen (61%), elastin (81%), and hyaluronan (44%) are noted in VF dECM. SIS dECM contains comparable elastin and hyaluronan but 67% greater soluble collagen than VF dECM. Cells deposit more neo-collagen on SIS than VF-dECM hydrogels, whereas neo-elastin (50 μg/scaffold) and neo-hyaluronan ( 6 μg/scaffold) are comparable between the two hydrogels. Overall, SIS dECM possesses reasonably similar proteomic profile and regenerative capacity to VF dECM. SIS dECM is considered a promising alternative for dECM-derived biomaterials for VF regeneration.
去细胞外基质(dECM)是一种用于组织工程应用的很有前景的材料。组织特异性dECM通常被视为一种有利的材料,它能够重现类似天然的微环境以促进细胞重塑。然而,从声带(VF)等小器官中可获得的dECM数量极少,这阻碍了其制造的可扩展性。小肠黏膜下层(SIS)是一种已被证明具有再生能力的商业产品,可能是用于VF应用的一个可行选择。本研究旨在使用基于质谱的蛋白质组学和体外研究,比较源自SIS或VF组织的dECM水凝胶在蛋白质含量和功能方面的差异。蛋白质组学分析表明,VF和SIS dECM共享75%的核心基质蛋白。尽管VF dECM蛋白与天然VF有更大的重叠,但SIS dECM显示出较小的样本间变异性。去细胞处理后,VF dECM中可溶性胶原蛋白(61%)、弹性蛋白(81%)和透明质酸(44%)显著减少。SIS dECM含有可比的弹性蛋白和透明质酸,但可溶性胶原蛋白比VF dECM多67%。细胞在SIS上沉积的新胶原蛋白比在VF-dECM水凝胶上更多,而两种水凝胶之间的新弹性蛋白(约50μg/支架)和新透明质酸(约6μg/支架)相当。总体而言,SIS dECM具有与VF dECM相当相似的蛋白质组学特征和再生能力。SIS dECM被认为是用于VF再生的dECM衍生生物材料的一个有前景的替代品。