Department of Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, 34450, Türkiye.
Department of Medical Oncology, Demiroglu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34394, Türkiye.
Oncol Res. 2023 Jul 21;31(5):689-696. doi: 10.32604/or.2023.030351. eCollection 2023.
Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m/daily chemotherapy treatment was applied in both groups. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) was administered at baseline and at three and six months after CRT. A total of 60 patients with LARC randomized to receive IC-CRT (n = 30) or LC-CRT (n = 30) were included in this phase II randomized trial. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of pathological outcomes, including pathological response rates (ypT0N0-complete response: 23.3% 16.7%, respectively, and ypT0-2N0-downstaging: 50% for each; = 0.809) and Dworak score-based pathological tumor regression grade (Grade 4-complete response: 23.3 16.7%, = 0.839). The 5-year overall survival (73.3 86.7%, = 0.173) rate was also similar. The acute radiation dermatitis ( < 0.001) and any hematological toxicity = 0.004) rates were significantly higher in the LC-CRT group, while no significant difference was noted between treatment groups in terms of baseline, third month, and sixth month EORTC QLQ-CR29 scores.
放射治疗(RT)通常采用两种标准方法之一用于术前治疗局部进展期可切除直肠癌(LARC):短程放疗(SC-RT)单独或长程放疗(LC-RT)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)化疗。使用中间疗程(IC)(33 Gy(格雷)/10 fr(分数)联合卡培他滨)术前放化疗(CRT)的 KROG 11-02 期单臂研究表明,病理完全缓解率和保留括约肌率接近 LC-CRT。目前的试验旨在比较 LC-CRT 和 IC-CRT 在 LARC 病例中的病理/肿瘤学结果、毒性和生活质量结果。规定的剂量为 IC-CRT 组 33 Gy/10 fr,LC-CRT 组 50.4 Gy/28 fr。两组均应用同步时相卡培他滨(Brunch 方案)1650 mg/m/d 化疗治疗。在 CRT 前后三个月和六个月时使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷-结直肠癌模块(EORTC QLQ-CR29)进行评估。共有 60 例 LARC 患者随机分为 IC-CRT(n = 30)或 LC-CRT(n = 30)组。两组在病理结果方面无显著差异,包括病理缓解率(ypT0N0-完全缓解:分别为 23.3%和 16.7%,ypT0-2N0-降级:各为 50%;=0.809)和 Dworak 评分基于肿瘤消退分级(完全缓解 4 级:23.3%和 16.7%,=0.839)。5 年总生存率(73.3%和 86.7%,=0.173)也相似。LC-CRT 组急性放射性皮炎(<0.001)和任何血液学毒性(=0.004)发生率显著较高,而两组在 EORTC QLQ-CR29 基线、第三个月和第六个月评分方面无显著差异。