• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮穿刺治疗肝包虫囊肿:是否采用 PAIR 技术。

Percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts: to PAIR or not to PAIR.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 1;36(5):308-317. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000956. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000956
PMID:37548385
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to review recent literature for percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts (cystic echinococcosis: CE) via different techniques such as PAIR (puncture, aspiration, injection, and reaspiration), standard catheterization, and modified catheterization technique (MoCaT).

RECENT FINDINGS

PAIR is an established technique and considered to be safe and effective for CE1 and CE3a as it is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, recurrence, and shorter hospital stay as compared with surgery. Standard catheterization is also dedicated for the treatment of CE1 and CE3a. PAIR should be preferred for treatment of liver CE1 and CE3a cysts, since PAIR is associated with lower major complication rates and shorter hospital stay. However, standard catheterization technique is indicated when cysto-biliary fistula develops or any technical difficulty arises during the PAIR. In these cases it is needed to switch PAIR to standard catheterization to complete the procedure.

SUMMARY

For CE1 and CE3a cysts, PAIR and standard catheterization are the choice for percutaneous treatments, while MoCaT is a treatment option for CE2 and CE3b cysts.

摘要

目的

回顾经皮治疗肝包虫囊肿(囊性包虫病:CE)的最新文献,包括不同技术,如 PAIR(穿刺、抽吸、注射和再抽吸)、标准导管化和改良导管化技术(MoCaT)。

最近的发现

PAIR 是一种成熟的技术,被认为对 CE1 和 CE3a 是安全有效的,因为与手术相比,它的发病率、死亡率、复发率和住院时间更短。标准导管化也专门用于治疗 CE1 和 CE3a。PAIR 应优先用于治疗肝 CE1 和 CE3a 囊肿,因为 PAIR 与较低的主要并发症发生率和较短的住院时间相关。然而,当发生囊胆瘘或 PAIR 过程中出现任何技术困难时,需要将 PAIR 转换为标准导管化以完成该过程。

总结

对于 CE1 和 CE3a 囊肿,PAIR 和标准导管化是经皮治疗的首选,而 MoCaT 是 CE2 和 CE3b 囊肿的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts: to PAIR or not to PAIR.经皮穿刺治疗肝包虫囊肿:是否采用 PAIR 技术。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 1;36(5):308-317. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000956. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Treatment of uncomplicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis (hydatid disease).肝包虫病(包虫病)的单纯性肝囊肿的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 12;7(7):CD015573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015573.
3
Percutaneous Management of Extrahepatic Cystic Echinococcosis, Long-Term Outcomes, and Insights on Rare Locations.肝外囊性包虫病的经皮治疗、长期疗效及罕见部位的见解
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.06.016.
4
Comparison of the Long-Term Results of Puncture, Aspiration, Injection and Re-aspiration (PAIR) and Catheterization Techniques for the Percutaneous Treatment of CE1 and CE3a Liver Hydatid Cysts: A Prospective Randomized Trial.经皮穿刺治疗 CE1 和 CE3a 肝包虫囊肿的穿刺抽吸注射再抽吸(PAIR)与置管技术的长期疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1034-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02477-7. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Percutaneous needle aspiration, injection, and reaspiration with or without benzimidazole coverage for uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cysts.对于单纯性肝包虫囊肿,采用经皮穿刺针吸、注射及再抽吸,可加用或不加用苯并咪唑类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003623.pub2.
6
Management of cystic echinococcosis complications and dissemination: where is the evidence?囊性棘球蚴病并发症及播散的管理:证据何在?
World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1266-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9982-9.
7
Percutaneous needle aspiration, injection, and re-aspiration with or without benzimidazole coverage for uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cysts.经皮穿刺针吸、注射及再次抽吸,有无苯并咪唑覆盖治疗单纯性肝包虫囊肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD003623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003623.pub3.
8
Renal Cystic Echinococcosis: Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Treatment.肾包虫病:经皮治疗的长期疗效。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Jun;32(6):890-895.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.519. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Multifaceted analysis of equine cystic echinococcosis: genotyping, immunopathology, and screening of repurposed drugs against E. equinus protoscolices.马细粒棘球蚴病的多方面分析:基因分型、免疫病理学以及针对马原头蚴的 repurposed 药物筛选
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Mar 17;21(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04616-z.
2
Current considerations for the management of liver echinococcosis.肝包虫病管理的当前考量因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 14;31(10):103973. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.103973.
3
Long-Term Results of Modified Catheterization Technique in the Treatment of CE Type 2 and 3b Liver Hydatid Cysts.
改良置管技术治疗CE 2型和3b型肝包虫囊肿的长期疗效
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):503-511. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-03976-1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
The many faces of pediatric hydatid disease: a pictorial review.小儿包虫病的多样表现:图文综述
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Jan;55(1):115-127. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06080-7. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Thyroid involvement in cystic echinococcosis: a systematic review.甲状腺包虫病的累及:系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):889. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09778-z.
6
Therapeutic Options in Hydatid Hepatic Cyst Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Three Surgical Approaches.肝包虫囊肿手术的治疗选择:三种手术方法的回顾性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(13):1399. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131399.
7
Laparoscopic Management of Multiple Liver, Omental, Mesenteric, Peritoneal, and Round Ligament Hydatid Cysts-A Rare Report of a Case and a Systematic Literature Review.腹腔镜治疗多发性肝、网膜、肠系膜、腹膜及圆韧带包虫囊肿——1例罕见病例报告及系统文献综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):205. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020205.