Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停幸存者6个月时低温与正常体温对社会参与和认知功能的影响:TTM2随机临床试验的预定义分析

Effects of Hypothermia vs Normothermia on Societal Participation and Cognitive Function at 6 Months in Survivors After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Predefined Analysis of the TTM2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Lilja Gisela, Ullén Susann, Dankiewicz Josef, Friberg Hans, Levin Helena, Nordström Erik Blennow, Heimburg Katarina, Jakobsen Janus Christian, Ahlqvist Marita, Bass Frances, Belohlavek Jan, Olsen Roy Bjørkholt, Cariou Alain, Eastwood Glenn, Fanebust Hans Rune, Grejs Anders M, Grimmer Lisa, Hammond Naomi E, Hovdenes Jan, Hrecko Juraj, Iten Manuela, Johansen Henriette, Keeble Thomas R, Kirkegaard Hans, Lascarrou Jean-Baptiste, Leithner Christoph, Lesona Mildred Eden, Levis Anja, Mion Marco, Moseby-Knappe Marion, Navarra Leanlove, Nordberg Per, Pelosi Paolo, Quayle Rachael, Rylander Christian, Sandberg Helena, Saxena Manoj, Schrag Claudia, Siranec Michal, Tiziano Cassina, Vignon Philippe, Wendel-Garcia Pedro David, Wise Matt P, Wright Kim, Nielsen Niklas, Cronberg Tobias

机构信息

Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Cardiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2023 Oct 1;80(10):1070-1079. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2536.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Targeted Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial reported no difference in mortality or poor functional outcome at 6 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This predefined exploratory analysis provides more detailed estimation of brain dysfunction for the comparison of the 2 intervention regimens.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of targeted hypothermia vs targeted normothermia on functional outcome with focus on societal participation and cognitive function in survivors 6 months after OHCA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study is a predefined analysis of an international multicenter, randomized clinical trial that took place from November 2017 to January 2020 and included participants at 61 hospitals in 14 countries. A structured follow-up for survivors performed at 6 months was by masked outcome assessors. The last follow-up took place in October 2020. Participants included 1861 adult (older than 18 years) patients with OHCA who were comatose at hospital admission. At 6 months, 939 of 1861 were alive and invited to a follow-up, of which 103 of 939 declined or were missing.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization 1:1 to temperature control with targeted hypothermia at 33 °C or targeted normothermia and early treatment of fever (37.8 °C or higher).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Functional outcome focusing on societal participation assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended ([GOSE] 1 to 8) and cognitive function assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment ([MoCA] 0 to 30) and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test ([SDMT] z scores). Higher scores represent better outcomes.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 836 of 939 survivors with a mean age of 60 (SD, 13) (range, 18 to 88) years (700 of 836 male [84%]) participated in the follow-up. There were no differences between the 2 intervention groups in functional outcome focusing on societal participation (GOSE score, odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.71-1.17; P = .46) or in cognitive function by MoCA (mean difference, 0.36; 95% CI,-0.33 to 1.05; P = .37) and SDMT (mean difference, 0.06; 95% CI,-0.16 to 0.27; P = .62). Limitations in societal participation (GOSE score less than 7) were common regardless of intervention (hypothermia, 178 of 415 [43%]; normothermia, 168 of 419 [40%]). Cognitive impairment was identified in 353 of 599 survivors (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this predefined analysis of comatose patients after OHCA, hypothermia did not lead to better functional outcome assessed with a focus on societal participation and cognitive function than management with normothermia. At 6 months, many survivors had not regained their pre-arrest activities and roles, and mild cognitive dysfunction was common.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908308.

摘要

重要性

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后目标体温过低与目标体温正常化(TTM2)试验报告称,院外心脏骤停后6个月的死亡率或不良功能结局无差异。这项预先定义的探索性分析为比较两种干预方案提供了更详细的脑功能障碍评估。

目的

研究目标体温过低与目标体温正常化对OHCA后6个月幸存者功能结局的影响,重点关注社会参与和认知功能。

设计、设置和参与者:本研究是对一项国际多中心随机临床试验的预先定义分析,该试验于2017年11月至2020年1月进行,纳入了14个国家61家医院的参与者。由蒙面结局评估者对幸存者进行6个月的结构化随访。最后一次随访于2020年10月进行。参与者包括1861名成年(18岁以上)OHCA患者,他们入院时昏迷。6个月时,1861名患者中有939名存活并被邀请参加随访,其中939名中有103名拒绝或失访。

干预措施

按1:1随机分组至体温控制,目标体温过低为33°C,或目标体温正常化并早期治疗发热(37.8°C或更高)。

主要结局和测量指标

通过格拉斯哥扩展结局量表([GOSE]1至8)评估以社会参与为重点的功能结局,通过蒙特利尔认知评估([MoCA]0至30)和符号数字模态测试([SDMT]z分数)评估认知功能。分数越高代表结局越好。

结果

6个月时,939名平均年龄为60(标准差,13)(范围,18至88)岁(836名中的700名男性[84%])的幸存者参加了随访。在以社会参与为重点的功能结局方面(GOSE评分,优势比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.71 - 1.17;P = 0.46),或通过MoCA(平均差异,0.36;95%置信区间, - 0.33至1.05;P = 0.37)和SDMT(平均差异,0.06;95%置信区间, - 0.16至0.27;P = 0.62)评估的认知功能方面,两个干预组之间均无差异。无论采用何种干预措施(体温过低组,415名中的178名[43%];体温正常化组,419名中的168名[40%]),社会参与受限(GOSE评分低于7)都很常见。599名幸存者中有353名(59%)被确定存在认知障碍。

结论

在这项对OHCA后昏迷患者的预先定义分析中,与体温正常化管理相比,体温过低并未导致以社会参与和认知功能为重点评估的更好功能结局。6个月时,许多幸存者尚未恢复到心脏骤停前的活动和角色,轻度认知功能障碍很常见。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02908308。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c04/10407762/b402f4679bdf/jamaneurol-e232536-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验