Strange Charlie, Allison Sheri, McCathern Jean, Sandhaus Robert A, Holm Kristen E
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States.
AlphaNet, Inc., Coral Gables, Florida, United States.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2023 Oct 26;10(4):392-399. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0430.
Currently approved therapies for individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) are intravenously infused products. The burdens and demographics of infusion practices in the United States are not well-characterized.
What is the prevalence of different infusion practices in the United States?
AlphaNet disease management participants completed a survey that captured current and past infusion practices. Data regarding the reasons for choosing their current infusion practice, problems with past infusion practices, resources required, and support services utilized were collected from February 8, 2022 through July 1, 2022.
Among 5266 individuals, infusions happened at home by health care providers (60.2%), at infusion clinics (30.6%), and by self-infusion (8.1%). Self-infusion prevalence increased with time on therapy and was more prevalent in younger individuals (61.2 ± 10.5 years) compared to users of other infusion practices (64.1 ± 11.0 years), (<0.001). The perceived benefits of self-infusion included: (1) freedom and flexibility (77.9%), (2) ability to travel (44.5%), (3) avoidance of infusion clinics (41.8%), (4) time-savings (35.9%), (5) less absence from work (26.6%), (6) less exposure to infections (22.1%), and (7) less cost (16.4%). Self-infusion was done through permanent intravenous catheters in 41.2% and peripheral intravenous catheters in 58.3%. Self-infusers were more satisfied (93.1% "very satisfied") than other groups. Among individuals currently infusing with home nurses or in clinics, 21.4% would consider self-infusing in the future.
Self-infusion of alpha-1 antitrypsin is feasible and associated with high satisfaction scores. Recommendations for catheter care, infusion support, and cost management are informed by survey results.
目前批准用于α-1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)患者的治疗方法是静脉输注产品。美国输液治疗的负担和人口统计学特征尚不明确。
美国不同输液治疗方法的普及率是多少?
AlphaNet疾病管理参与者完成了一项调查,该调查记录了当前和过去的输液治疗方法。从2022年2月8日至2022年7月1日收集了有关选择当前输液治疗方法的原因、过去输液治疗方法存在的问题、所需资源以及所使用的支持服务的数据。
在5266名个体中,输液由医护人员在家中进行(60.2%),在输液诊所进行(30.6%),以及自我输液(8.1%)。自我输液的普及率随治疗时间增加,与其他输液治疗方法的使用者(64.1±11.0岁)相比,在较年轻个体(61.2±10.5岁)中更为普遍(<0.001)。自我输液的感知益处包括:(1)自由和灵活性(77.9%),(2)出行能力(44.5%),(3)避免去输液诊所(41.8%),(4)节省时间(35.9%),(5)减少缺勤(26.6%),(6)减少感染暴露(22.1%),以及(7)成本降低(16.4%)。41.2%的自我输液通过永久性静脉导管进行,58.3%通过外周静脉导管进行。自我输液者比其他组更满意(93.1%“非常满意”)。在目前由家庭护士或在诊所输液的个体中,21.4%未来会考虑自我输液。
α-1抗胰蛋白酶的自我输液是可行的,且满意度评分较高。调查结果为导管护理、输液支持和成本管理提供了建议。