• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性应激对风险决策的影响与神经质有关:一项关于气球模拟风险任务的功能磁共振成像研究。

Effects of acute stress on risky decision-making are related to neuroticism: An fMRI study of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.

作者信息

Zhu Yuyang, Wang Yituo, Chen Pinhong, Lei Yu, Yan Feng, Yang Zheng, Yang Liu, Wang Lubin

机构信息

The Brain Science Center, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100850, China; Aviation Psychological Efficacy Laboratory, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Air Force Medical University, Beijing 100142, China.

The Brain Science Center, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100850, China; Department of Radiology, Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.038. Epub 2023 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.038
PMID:37549812
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision making under acute stress is frequent in daily life. While evidence suggests for a modulatory role of neuroticism on risky decision-making behaviors, the neural correlates underlying the association between neuroticism and risky decision-making under acute stress remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

Based on a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) with concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging, we evaluated the effect of acute stress on risk-taking behavior in 27 healthy male adults, and further assessed stress-induced changes in brain activation according to the individual differences in neuroticism.

RESULTS

Higher trait neuroticism levels positively correlated with increased stress-modulated activation of the right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex during risk-taking, and negatively correlated with decreased stress-modulated activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during cash-outs.

LIMITATIONS

Only male participants were recruited.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a positive correlation between neuroticism and greater risk-taking behavior under acute stress. These results extend our understanding of the increased risk-taking propensity in high neurotic individuals under acute stress.

摘要

背景

在日常生活中,急性应激下的决策很常见。虽然有证据表明神经质对风险决策行为具有调节作用,但急性应激下神经质与风险决策之间关联的神经机制仍有待阐明。

方法

基于改良的气球模拟风险任务(BART)并同步进行功能磁共振成像,我们评估了急性应激对27名健康成年男性冒险行为的影响,并根据神经质的个体差异进一步评估了应激诱导的大脑激活变化。

结果

较高的特质神经质水平与冒险过程中右侧背侧前扣带回皮质应激调节激活增加呈正相关,与兑现时右侧背外侧前额叶皮质应激调节激活减少呈负相关。

局限性

仅招募了男性参与者。

结论

我们发现神经质与急性应激下更大的冒险行为之间存在正相关。这些结果扩展了我们对高神经质个体在急性应激下冒险倾向增加的理解。

相似文献

1
Effects of acute stress on risky decision-making are related to neuroticism: An fMRI study of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.急性应激对风险决策的影响与神经质有关:一项关于气球模拟风险任务的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.038. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
2
Neural correlates of increased risk-taking propensity in sleep-deprived people along with a changing risk level.睡眠剥夺者冒险倾向增加的神经相关因素及风险水平变化。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Dec;11(6):1910-1921. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9658-7.
3
Puberty and risky decision-making in male adolescents.青春期与男性青少年的冒险决策。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Apr;60:101230. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101230. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Comparison of neural correlates of risk decision making between genders: an exploratory fNIRS study of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).性别间风险决策神经关联的比较:一项关于气球模拟风险任务(BART)的探索性近红外光谱研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1896-911. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.030. Epub 2012 May 23.
5
Test-retest reliability of fMRI-measured brain activity during decision making under risk.风险决策下 fMRI 测量脑活动的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 1;214:116759. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116759. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Acute stress increases risky decisions and dampens prefrontal activation among adolescent boys.急性应激会增加青少年男性的冒险决策,并抑制前额叶的激活。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:679-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.067. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Neural correlates of risk taking in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder during risky decision-making.强迫症患者在风险决策过程中冒险行为的神经相关因素。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jan 15;345:192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.099. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
Diminished cortical response to risk and loss during risky decision making in alcohol use disorder.在酒精使用障碍的风险决策过程中,对风险和损失的皮质反应减弱。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108391. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108391. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
9
Test-retest reliability of brain responses to risk-taking during the balloon analogue risk task.在气球模拟风险任务中,冒险行为的大脑反应的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116495. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
Sleep duration moderates the association between insula activation and risky decisions under stress in adolescents and adults.睡眠时间调节青少年和成年人在压力下脑岛激活与风险决策之间的关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 27;95:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Opponent's Neuroticism Based on Behavior in Wargame.基于军事模拟游戏中的行为识别对手的神经质特质
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;15(8):1012. doi: 10.3390/bs15081012.
2
Common and Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Evidence From the Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis.寻求风险和规避风险背后的共同和不同神经机制:来自神经影像学荟萃分析的证据
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70295. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70295.
3
Trait Anxiety Leads to "Better" Performance? A Study on Acute Stress and Uncertain Decision-Making.
特质焦虑会带来“更好”的表现?一项关于急性应激与不确定性决策的研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(12):1186. doi: 10.3390/bs14121186.
4
EEG Evidence of Acute Stress Enhancing Inhibition Control by Increasing Attention.脑电图证据表明,急性应激通过提高注意力增强抑制控制。
Brain Sci. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):1013. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14101013.
5
A Hybrid EEG-Based Stress State Classification Model Using Multi-Domain Transfer Entropy and PCANet.一种基于混合脑电图的压力状态分类模型,使用多域转移熵和PCANet
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 12;14(6):595. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060595.