Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Aug;21(8):831-840.e3. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7034.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury (ICI-PI) ranges from asymptomatic hyperlipasemia to symptomatic acute pancreatitis (AP). The proportion of pancreatic injury while receiving ICIs that is attributable to therapy remains unclear. We evaluated the etiology of hyperlipasemia in patients receiving ICIs, and the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of ICI-PI.
We assessed 6,450 consecutive adult patients with cancer who received ICI doses between 2011 and 2019, 364 of whom had at least 1 instance of elevated serum lipase after ICI initiation and were included in our trial. Primary outcomes were the development of ICI-PI and ICI-induced acute pancreatitis (ICI-AP).
Pancreatic injury was attributable to ICI use in 105 individuals (29% of those with hyperlipasemia; 1.6% overall). Of 27 patients with ICI-AP, 4 (15%) presented asymptomatically with hyperlipasemia and pancreatic inflammation on imaging. In multivariable regression, the presence of other immune-related adverse events was positively associated with ICI-AP (≥2 events: odds ratio, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.47-26.03). Compared with patients with other ICI-PI, those with ICI-AP more frequently required steroids (74% vs 4%), intravenous fluids (85% vs 10%), hospitalization (89% vs 9%), and permanent cessation of ICIs due to pancreatic injury (70% vs 3%), and less frequently continued therapy uninterrupted (0% vs 40%) (P<.01 for all). Of the 105 patients, 3 (3%) developed exocrine insufficiency and 9 (9%) developed endocrine insufficiency, which were concentrated among those with ICI-AP.
A minority of occurrences of pancreatitis and hyperlipasemia in patients receiving ICIs are due to these therapies, supporting NCCN recommendations to exclude alternative etiologies. Because a notable proportion of patients with ICI-AP were asymptomatic but warranted treatment per current guidelines, abdominal imaging is diagnostically valuable in those with significant hyperlipasemia. Patients with ICI-AP should be monitored for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Many with hyperlipasemia who do not meet the criteria for AP can continue therapy uninterrupted.
免疫检查点抑制剂诱导的胰腺损伤(ICI-PI)的范围从无症状性高胰酶血症到有症状的急性胰腺炎(AP)。在接受 ICI 治疗的患者中,胰腺损伤归因于治疗的比例尚不清楚。我们评估了接受 ICI 治疗的患者中高胰酶血症的病因,以及 ICI-PI 的临床特征、处理和结局。
我们评估了 2011 年至 2019 年间接受 ICI 剂量的 6450 例连续成年癌症患者,其中 364 例在 ICI 起始后至少有 1 次血清脂肪酶升高,并纳入了本试验。主要结局是发生 ICI-PI 和 ICI 诱导的急性胰腺炎(ICI-AP)。
105 例(高胰酶血症患者的 29%;总体的 1.6%)患者的胰腺损伤归因于 ICI 的使用。27 例 ICI-AP 患者中,有 4 例(15%)表现为无症状性高胰酶血症和胰腺炎症的影像学表现。在多变量回归中,存在其他免疫相关不良事件与 ICI-AP 呈正相关(≥2 项事件:比值比,5.43;95%CI,1.47-26.03)。与其他 ICI-PI 患者相比,ICI-AP 患者更频繁地需要使用类固醇(74% vs. 4%)、静脉输液(85% vs. 10%)、住院(89% vs. 9%)和因胰腺损伤而永久性停止 ICI(70% vs. 3%),并且更不频繁地继续不间断治疗(0% vs. 40%)(所有 P<.01)。在 105 例患者中,有 3 例(3%)发生外分泌不足,9 例(9%)发生内分泌不足,这些患者主要集中在 ICI-AP 患者中。
在接受 ICI 治疗的患者中,胰腺炎和高胰酶血症的发生很少是由这些治疗引起的,这支持 NCCN 建议排除其他病因。由于相当比例的 ICI-AP 患者无症状但根据当前指南需要治疗,因此腹部影像学检查对有明显高胰酶血症的患者具有诊断价值。ICI-AP 患者应监测外分泌胰腺功能不全。许多不符合 AP 标准的高胰酶血症患者可以不间断地继续治疗。