Park Yong Hyun, O'Rourke Paul, Gabrielson Andrew, Hogan Sean O, Holmboe Eric, Jing Yuezhou, Yamazaki Kenji, Trock Bruce J, Han Misop
James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jan;39(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08351-9. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Financial relationships with drug and medical device companies may impact quality of care and academic research. However, little is known when and how these financial relationships develop among newly independent physicians who recently completed from residency or fellowship programs in internal medicine (IM).
To compare patterns of industry payments among IM graduates.
Retrospective, observational cohort study.
IM graduates from residency or fellowship programs between January 2015 and December 2019.
We analyzed Open Payments reports made between July 2015 and June 2021 to recent graduates of U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency and fellowship programs in IM. The primary outcome was general payments accepted by these physicians, stratified by procedural (i.e., critical care medicine/pulmonary medicine, cardiac/cardiovascular disease, and gastroenterology) and non-procedural (i.e., infectious disease, general internal medicine, and other specialties) subspecialties. The secondary outcomes included general payments stratified by sex and age at residency or fellowship training completion.
There were 41,669 IM physicians with a median age of 33.0 years. In the first 3 years after completion, the proportion of physicians accepting any general payments was 72.6%, 91.9%, and 86.8% in Critical Care Medicine/Pulmonary Medicine, Cardiac/Cardiovascular Disease, and Gastroenterology, compared to 56.1%, 52.6%, and 52.3% in Infectious Disease, General Internal Medicine, and Other Specialties (p<0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables, the procedural group showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) for accepting any general payments and at least $5000 of general payments compared to the non-procedural group. The HRs of accepting any general payments in the procedural subspecialty were 2.26 (95% CI, 2.11-2.42) and 2.83 (95% CI, 2.70-2.97) in female and male physicians, respectively (p-value < 0.0001).
Industry financial relationships among newly independent physicians in IM exist immediately after completion of training and are influenced by subspecialty, sex, and age.
与药品和医疗器械公司的财务关系可能会影响医疗质量和学术研究。然而,对于那些刚从内科住院医师培训或专科培训项目毕业的新独立医生而言,这些财务关系何时以及如何发展,我们却知之甚少。
比较内科毕业生的行业支付模式。
回顾性观察队列研究。
2015年1月至2019年12月期间完成住院医师培训或专科培训项目的内科毕业生。
我们分析了2015年7月至2021年6月期间向美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的内科住院医师培训和专科培训项目的近期毕业生提交的公开支付报告。主要结果是这些医生接受的一般支付情况,按程序(即重症医学/肺病学、心脏/心血管疾病和胃肠病学)和非程序(即传染病、普通内科和其他专科)亚专科进行分层。次要结果包括按住院医师培训或专科培训结束时的性别和年龄分层的一般支付情况。
共有41,669名内科医生,中位年龄为33.0岁。在完成培训后的前3年,重症医学/肺病学、心脏/心血管疾病和胃肠病学领域接受任何一般支付的医生比例分别为72.6%、91.9%和86.8%,而传染病、普通内科和其他专科领域的这一比例分别为56.1%、52.6%和52.3%(p<0.0001)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,与非程序组相比,程序组接受任何一般支付以及至少5000美元一般支付的风险比(HR)有所增加。在程序亚专科中,女性和男性医生接受任何一般支付的HR分别为2.26(95%CI,2.11-2.42)和2.83(95%CI,2.70-2.97)(p值<0.0001)。
内科新独立医生在培训结束后立即存在行业财务关系,且受到亚专科、性别和年龄的影响。