Zhang Qian, Qi Ling, Ji De-Xiang, Li Fei
Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University; Institute of Hematology, Academy of Clinical Medicine of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.
Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University; Institute of Hematology, Academy of Clinical Medicine of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. E-mail:
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Aug;31(4):1014-1018. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2023.04.013.
To analyze the efficacy and safety of flumatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
The clinical data of 56 CML patients treated with flumatinib from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 35 new diagnosed CML patients treated with flumatinib (group A), 10 patients with imatinib/dasatinib intolerance (group B) and 11 patients with imatinib/dasatinib resistance (group C) switched to flumatinib treatment, respectively. The molecular response and adverse effects of flumatinib treatment were evaluated.
In group A, the early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months was 40.0%, and the major molecular response (MMR) at 6 and 12 months was 43.7% and 46.2%, respectively. In group B, the EMR was 50.0% at 3 months, and the MMR was 70.0% and 66.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Among evaluable patients, 6 cases in group B achieved molecular response of 4.5 (MR4.5) at 12 months after switching to flumatinib treatment. In group C, 3 cases who switched from imatinib resistance to flumatinib achieved MR4.5 at 12 months, but 2 cases who switched from dasatinib resistance to flumatinib failed. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) scores for patients in the medium-risk/high-risk group compared with those in the low-risk group for 3-month EMR (18.8% vs 57.9%), 6-month MMR (15.4% vs 63.2%) and 12-month MR4.5 (15.4% vs 69.2%) ( =0.036, =0.012, =0.015). The most common adverse effect in group A was thrombocytopenia, accounting for 54.5%, and 22.8% (8/35) patients discontinued the drug due to haematological adverse effects. Compared with patients who did not discontinue the drug or whose recovery time from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity was <1 month, patients whose recovery time from discontinuation was ≥1 month had a significantly worse 3-month EMR, 6-month MMR and 12-month MR4.5 ( =0.028, =0.021, =0.002).
Flumatinib has better molecular response and tolerance in patients with primary, imatinib/dasatinib-intolerant or resistant CML. Medium-risk/high-risk in ELTS score and time to recovery from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity ≥1 month are important factors influencing achievement of better molecular response in flumatinib treatment.
分析氟马替尼治疗慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的疗效和安全性。
回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月在南昌大学第一附属医院接受氟马替尼治疗的56例CML患者的临床资料。患者分为三组:35例初诊CML患者接受氟马替尼治疗(A组),10例对伊马替尼/达沙替尼不耐受的患者(B组)和11例对伊马替尼/达沙替尼耐药的患者(C组)转而接受氟马替尼治疗。评估氟马替尼治疗的分子反应和不良反应。
A组3个月时的早期分子反应(EMR)为40.0%,6个月和12个月时的主要分子反应(MMR)分别为43.7%和46.2%。B组3个月时的EMR为50.0%,6个月和12个月时的MMR分别为70.0%和66.2%。在可评估的患者中,B组6例患者在转而接受氟马替尼治疗12个月后达到4.5级分子反应(MR4.5)。C组中,3例从伊马替尼耐药转为氟马替尼治疗的患者在12个月时达到MR4.5,但2例从达沙替尼耐药转为氟马替尼治疗的患者未成功。亚组分析显示,中危/高危组患者与低危组患者在3个月EMR(18.8%对57.9%)、6个月MMR(15.4%对63.2%)和12个月MR4.5(15.4%对69.2%)的EUTOS长期生存(ELTS)评分方面存在显著差异(分别为P = 0.036、P = 0.012、P = 0.015)。A组最常见的不良反应是血小板减少,占54.5%,22.8%(8/35)的患者因血液学不良反应停药。与未停药或因血液学毒性停药后恢复时间<1个月的患者相比,停药后恢复时间≥1个月的患者3个月EMR、6个月MMR和12个月MR4.5明显更差(分别为P = 0.028、P = 0.021、P = 0.002)。
氟马替尼在初治、对伊马替尼/达沙替尼不耐受或耐药的CML患者中具有更好的分子反应和耐受性。ELTS评分中的中危/高危以及因血液学毒性停药后恢复时间≥1个月是影响氟马替尼治疗中获得更好分子反应的重要因素。