Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Conserv Biol. 2024 Feb;38(1):e14160. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14160. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
The establishment of protected areas is a cornerstone of conservation, but permanent protection could be inefficient or even impossible in some situations. We synthesized the literature on temporarily conserved areas (TCAs) across Canada, the United States, and Mexico. We used a comprehensive search string to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2021 from the Web of Science. We identified 27 relevant peer-reviewed articles that examined the potential benefits of TCAs in the study area, indicating TCA is a relatively understudied area of research in the peer-reviewed literature. The TCA studies were highly clustered; 77% of studies focused on protecting a single life stage of migratory species and 61% of studies related to temporary conservation of breeding or staging habitats for migratory birds. Ninety-three percent of studies focused on preventing human-driven threats, mainly on public lands of coastal areas, the Great Plains, and the Mississippi Valley in the central United States. Short-term and experimental studies were the dominant study types. TCAs have the potential to complement permanently protected areas and provide protection when permanent protection is difficult. Some included studies examined their conservation value, but the ecological, social, and economic outcomes of TCAs are unclear. More TCA research is needed to determine the role they could play in conservation worldwide. Embracing the concept of TCAs as conservation tool could lead to more comprehensive and consistent reporting of the outcomes of temporary area-based conservation measures. However, a global review and analysis of effectiveness of TCAs will be required if they are to play a formal role in meeting international targets for biodiversity conservation.
保护区的建立是保护的基石,但在某些情况下,永久保护可能效率低下甚至不可能。我们综合了加拿大、美国和墨西哥的临时保护区(TCA)的文献。我们使用全面的搜索字符串从 Web of Science 检索了 2000 年至 2021 年发表的同行评议文章。我们确定了 27 篇相关的同行评议文章,这些文章探讨了 TCA 在研究区域的潜在益处,表明 TCA 是同行评议文献中相对研究不足的领域。TCA 研究高度集中;77%的研究集中在保护迁徙物种的单个生命阶段,61%的研究与候鸟繁殖或栖息临时保护有关。93%的研究侧重于防止人为威胁,主要是在美国中部沿海地区、大平原和密西西比河谷的公有土地上。短期和实验研究是主要的研究类型。TCA 有可能补充永久保护区,并在永久保护困难时提供保护。一些包括研究在内的研究检验了它们的保护价值,但 TCA 的生态、社会和经济结果尚不清楚。需要更多的 TCA 研究来确定它们在全球保护中的作用。将 TCA 作为保护工具的概念,可以更全面和一致地报告临时基于区域的保护措施的结果。然而,如果 TCA 要在满足国际生物多样性保护目标方面发挥正式作用,就需要对其进行全球审查和有效性分析。