• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Urine drug testing in the context of opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: a content analysis of U.S. state laws in 2022.2022 年美国各州法律中关于慢性疼痛阿片类镇痛药处方的尿药物检测内容分析。
Pain Med. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):1306-1317. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad103.
2
Review of the Current State of Urine Drug Testing in Chronic Pain: Still Effective as a Clinical Tool and Curbing Abuse, or an Arcane Test?慢性疼痛中尿液药物检测的现状评估:作为临床工具仍然有效并能遏制滥用,还是一种神秘的检测方法?
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021 Feb 17;25(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00918-z.
3
Clinician Response to Aberrant Urine Drug Test Results of Patients Prescribed Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain.临床医生对接受阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛患者异常尿液药物检测结果的反应。
Clin J Pain. 2019 Jan;35(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000652.
4
Do Urine Drug Tests Reveal Substance Misuse Among Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain?尿药物检测能否发现因慢性疼痛而开具阿片类药物的患者药物滥用?
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07095-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Predictors of urine drug testing for patients with chronic pain: Results from a national cohort of U.S. veterans.慢性疼痛患者尿液药物检测的预测因素:来自美国退伍军人全国队列的结果。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):82-7. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1110742. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
Urine Drug Testing Among Patients Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy: Patient and Clinician Factors.长期阿片类药物治疗患者的尿液药物检测:患者和临床医生因素。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Aug 9;36(4):537-541. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220360R1. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
Shorter drug testing intervals are associated with improved drug misuse rates.更短的药物检测间隔与药物滥用率的改善相关。
J Opioid Manag. 2020;16(5):357-373. doi: 10.5055/jom.2020.0591.
8
Treatment changes following aberrant urine drug test results for patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy.接受慢性阿片类药物治疗的患者尿液药物检测结果异常后的治疗变化。
J Opioid Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):45-51. doi: 10.5055/jom.2015.0251.
9
Urine Drug Testing in Cancer Pain Management.癌症疼痛管理中的尿液药物检测。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):99-104. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0525. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物的合理、安全与有效处方:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2S):S3-S92.

引用本文的文献

1
Urine Drug Testing Among Long-term Opioid Prescribed Patients: Disparities and Opportunities.长期接受阿片类药物处方患者的尿液药物检测:差异与机遇
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02474-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Access and Urine Drug Screening Among Older Patients With Poor-Prognosis Cancer Near the End of Life.晚期癌症预后不佳的老年患者阿片类药物获取和尿液药物筛查方面的种族和民族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 10;41(14):2511-2522. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01413. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Definitive urine drug test findings in patients prescribed opioids for pain from a large national database.从大型国家数据库中观察到,开具阿片类药物治疗疼痛的患者的明确尿液药物检测结果。
J Opioid Manag. 2022 Jul-Aug;18(4):361-375. doi: 10.5055/jom.2022.0723.
3
Systematic Identification and Categorization of Opioid Prescribing and Dispensing Policies in 16 States and Washington, DC.系统识别和分类 16 个州和华盛顿特区的阿片类药物处方和配药政策。
Pain Med. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):130-138. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac124.
4
Patient-centered quality measurement for opioid use disorder: Development of a taxonomy to address gaps in research and practice.以患者为中心的阿片类药物使用障碍质量测量:为解决研究和实践中的差距而制定的分类法。
Subst Abus. 2022 Dec;43(1):1286-1299. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2095082.
5
Assessment tools for problematic opioid use in palliative care: A scoping review.评估工具在姑息治疗中问题性阿片类药物使用:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;35(7):1295-1322. doi: 10.1177/02692163211015567. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.系统评价针对美国阿片类药物流行的国家政策干预措施,2007-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
7
The state of the science in opioid policy research.阿片类药物政策研究的科学现状。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Sep 1;214:108137. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108137. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
8
Trends in Utilization of Prescribed Controlled Substances in US Commercially Insured Adults, 2004-2019.2004-2019 年美国商业保险成年人中规定管制物质的使用趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):1006-1008. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0989.
9
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing.安全开具阿片类药物处方没有捷径可走。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2285-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1904190. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
A Practical Guide to Urine Drug Monitoring.尿液药物监测实用指南
Fed Pract. 2018 Apr;35(4):38-44.

2022 年美国各州法律中关于慢性疼痛阿片类镇痛药处方的尿药物检测内容分析。

Urine drug testing in the context of opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: a content analysis of U.S. state laws in 2022.

机构信息

School of Global Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32801, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine (Secondary Joint Appointment), University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32827, United States.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):1306-1317. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad103.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnad103
PMID:37551941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10690857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In response to the opioid crisis, U.S. states have passed laws requiring urine drug testing (UDT) when opioid analgesics are prescribed for chronic pain. We sought to identify state law UDT requirements.

METHODS

We searched NexisUni legal database using terms related to UDT, chronic pain, and opioids. We included laws effective during spring 2022 that required UDT when opioids were prescribed for chronic pain. We performed deductive content analysis, coding laws for mandated UDT frequency, type of clinician and type of payer to whom the law applied, and circumstances under which UDT was mandated.

RESULTS

We found 32 laws across 13 states that met our inclusion criteria. UDT requirements varied substantially by state, including with regard to the type of clinician to whom the law applied, the mandated frequency of UDT (eg, at initiation/assessment, at least annually, more than once per year), and the circumstances in which UDT was mandated (eg, patient had substance use disorder; dosage/day threshold).

DISCUSSION

Relatively few states have UDT mandates associated with prescribing opioids as chronic pain treatment. When developing policy indicators for empirical studies, researchers evaluating how UDT policy affects health outcomes must consider the complexity and lack of uniformity of UDT requirements. In addition, even if states mandate UDT, it is unclear whether clinicians understand the best way to use the test results.

摘要

背景

为应对阿片类药物危机,美国各州通过法律,规定在开出阿片类镇痛药治疗慢性疼痛时必须进行尿液药物检测(UDT)。我们试图确定州法律的 UDT 要求。

方法

我们使用与 UDT、慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关的术语在 NexisUni 法律数据库中进行搜索。我们纳入了在 2022 年春季生效的、规定在开出阿片类镇痛药治疗慢性疼痛时必须进行 UDT 的法律。我们采用演绎内容分析法,对法律规定的 UDT 强制频率、适用的临床医生类型和支付方类型,以及 UDT 被强制的情况进行编码。

结果

我们在 13 个州发现了 32 项符合纳入标准的法律。UDT 要求因州而异,包括适用法律的临床医生类型、UDT 的强制频率(例如,在开始/评估时、至少每年一次、每年多次),以及 UDT 被强制的情况(例如,患者有物质使用障碍;剂量/日阈值)。

讨论

相对较少的州有与开出阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛相关的 UDT 强制要求。在制定用于实证研究的政策指标时,评估 UDT 政策如何影响健康结果的研究人员必须考虑 UDT 要求的复杂性和缺乏统一性。此外,即使各州都强制要求进行 UDT,也不清楚临床医生是否了解如何最好地利用检测结果。