• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一个针对医疗保健专业人员的在线教育项目,该项目针对围产期死亡的最佳实践管理:改善电子学习。

Evaluation of an online education program for healthcare professionals on best practice management of perinatal deaths: IMPROVE eLearning.

机构信息

Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Feb;64(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13743. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.13743
PMID:37551966
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The IMPROVE (IMproving Perinatal Mortality Review and Outcomes Via Education) eLearning, developed by the Stillbirth Centre of Research Excellence in partnership with the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand was launched in December 2019. Based on the successful face-to-face program, the eLearning aims to increase availability and accessibility of high-quality online education to healthcare professionals providing care for families around the time of perinatal death, to improve the delivery of respectful and supportive clinical care and increase best practice investigation of perinatal deaths.

AIMS

To evaluate participants' reported learning outcomes (change in knowledge and confidence) and overall acceptability of the program.

METHODS

Pre- and post-eLearning in-built surveys were collected over two years (Dec. 2019-Nov. 2021), with a mix of Likert and polar questions. Pre- and post-eLearning differences in knowledge and confidence were assessed using McNemar's test. Subgroup analysis of overall acceptability by profession was assessed using Pearson's χ .

RESULTS

One thousand, three hundred and thirty-nine participants were included. The majority were midwives (80.2%, n = 1074). A significant improvement in knowledge and confidence was shown across all chapters (P < 0.01). The chapter showing the greatest improvement was perinatal mortality audit and classification (21.5% pre- and 89.2% post-education). Over 90% of respondents agreed the online education was relevant, helpful, acceptable, engaging. Importantly, 80.7% of participants considered they were likely to change some aspect of their clinical practice after the eLearning. There was no difference in responses to relevance and acceptability of the eLearning program by profession.

CONCLUSIONS

The IMPROVE eLearning is an acceptable and engaging method of delivery for clinical education, with the potential to improve care and management of perinatal deaths.

摘要

背景

IMPROVE(通过教育改善围产期死亡评审和结局)电子学习课程由卓越的死产研究中心与澳大利亚和新西兰围产学会合作开发,于 2019 年 12 月推出。该电子学习课程基于成功的面对面课程,旨在为围产期死亡时为家庭提供护理的医疗保健专业人员提供更多高质量的在线教育,提高尊重和支持性临床护理的提供,并增加围产期死亡的最佳实践调查。

目的

评估参与者报告的学习成果(知识和信心的变化)和对该计划的总体接受程度。

方法

在两年内(2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 11 月)收集了电子学习前后的内置调查,采用了 Likert 和极性问题的混合形式。使用 McNemar 检验评估知识和信心在电子学习前后的差异。使用 Pearson χ 对专业的整体可接受性进行亚组分析。

结果

共有 1339 名参与者被纳入研究。大多数参与者是助产士(80.2%,n=1074)。所有章节的知识和信心均显著提高(P<0.01)。知识和信心提高幅度最大的章节是围产期死亡率审核和分类(教育前为 21.5%,教育后为 89.2%)。超过 90%的受访者认为在线教育具有相关性、有用性、可接受性和吸引力。重要的是,80.7%的参与者认为他们在电子学习后可能会改变临床实践的某些方面。电子学习课程的相关性和可接受性在不同专业之间没有差异。

结论

IMPROVE 电子学习是一种可接受和吸引人的临床教育提供方式,有可能改善围产期死亡的护理和管理。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an online education program for healthcare professionals on best practice management of perinatal deaths: IMPROVE eLearning.评价一个针对医疗保健专业人员的在线教育项目,该项目针对围产期死亡的最佳实践管理:改善电子学习。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Feb;64(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13743. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
2
Evaluation of an online education module designed to reduce stillbirth.旨在降低死产率的在线教育模块评估
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Oct;61(5):675-683. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13380. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Evaluation of an international educational programme for health care professionals on best practice in the management of a perinatal death: IMproving Perinatal mortality Review and Outcomes Via Education (IMPROVE).一项针对医疗保健专业人员的围产期死亡管理最佳实践国际教育项目的评估:通过教育改善围产期死亡率审查与结果(IMPROVE)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1173-8.
4
Living with Loss: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating an internet-based perinatal bereavement program for parents following stillbirth and neonatal death.带着失去生活:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,评估针对因死胎和新生儿死亡而丧子的父母的基于互联网的围产期丧亲项目。
Trials. 2022 Jun 6;23(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06363-0.
5
The utility of adaptive eLearning in cervical cytopathology education.自适应电子学习在宫颈细胞学教育中的应用。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Feb;126(2):129-135. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21942. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Evaluation of a pilot online education program to develop midwives' knowledge, skill and confidence in perinatal mental health in rural South Australia.评估一个在线教育试点项目,以提高南澳大利亚农村地区助产士在围产期心理健康方面的知识、技能和信心。
Women Birth. 2024 Mar;37(2):355-361. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
7
eLearning in Physical Therapy: Lessons Learned From Transitioning a Professional Education Program to Full eLearning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.物理治疗中的电子学习:在 COVID-19 大流行期间将专业教育项目完全过渡到电子学习中吸取的经验教训。
Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab082.
8
Speech-language therapists' perceptions of an eLearning program to support training in videofluoroscopic swallow studies.言语治疗师对支持视频透视吞咽研究培训的电子学习计划的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Mar;56(2):257-270. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12594. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
9
Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality.通过死亡审核与评估降低孕产妇、围产期及儿童死亡率
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3(3):CD012982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of the Malnutrition eLearning Course for Global Capacity Building in the Management of Malnutrition: Cross-Country Interrupted Time-Series Study.营养不良电子学习课程在全球营养不良管理能力建设中的有效性:跨国中断时间序列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 3;20(10):e10396. doi: 10.2196/10396.

引用本文的文献

1
How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.产科医生如何经历死产和围产期死亡:一项系统评价和元综合分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 16;5(2):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465. eCollection 2025 May.