• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科医生如何经历死产和围产期死亡:一项系统评价和元综合分析。

How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

作者信息

Cates Frances, Wetzler Sara, Wishlade Tabitha, Patel Mehali, Aiken Catherine E

机构信息

Department of Liberal Arts (Cates), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Department of History and Philosophy of Science (Wetzler), University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 16;5(2):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465
PMID:40134563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11931382/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Globally, ∼2 million babies are stillborn annually, many in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to understand the experience of obstetricians caring for parents who experience stillbirth and perinatal loss across global settings.

DATA SOURCES

Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ASSIA via Proquest were searched, database inception-June 2024.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies with qualitative components describing experiences of obstetricians providing stillbirth care in any global setting.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was utilized to conduct quality assessment. NVivo software was employed for inductive coding and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen qualitative studies from both low- and high-resource settings met the inclusion criteria for meta-synthesis. We identified several major themes including the emotional burdens experienced by obstetricians providing stillbirth care, the challenges of patient-provider interactions following adverse outcomes, and a lack of support and resources. Obstetricians across global settings felt devastation, guilt, blame, and a sense of personal responsibility following stillbirth. Obstetricians struggled to navigate the burden of expectation placed on their overall provision of care and tended to question their own professional competence. A subset of obstetricians felt unprepared for the complexity of patient-provider interactions following stillbirth.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetricians experienced complex and conflicting emotions, citing high emotional burden from managing stillbirth cases. Obstetricians identified lack of training and support for providing bereavement care across healthcare settings, indicating a gap that should be filled by stillbirth and bereavement care interventions and education in obstetrical training programs across global settings. Infrastructure for bereavement care training and support systems for obstetricians are crucial to improve the quality of stillbirth and perinatal loss care and prevent an exodus of needed providers for women's care worldwide.

摘要

目的

全球范围内,每年约有200万婴儿死产,其中许多发生在低收入和中等收入国家。我们旨在了解全球各地产科医生照顾死产和围产期死亡患儿父母的经历。

数据来源

通过Ovid检索Medline、通过Ovid检索Embase、通过Ebsco检索CINAHL、通过Ebsco检索PsychINFO、Scopus、Web of Science核心合集以及通过Proquest检索ASSIA,检索时间为数据库建立至2024年6月。

研究纳入标准

包含定性部分且描述了全球任何环境下产科医生提供死产护理经历的研究。

研究评估与综合方法

采用定性研究的批判性评估技能计划清单进行质量评估。使用NVivo软件进行归纳编码和主题分析。

结果

来自资源丰富和资源匮乏地区的13项定性研究符合元综合分析的纳入标准。我们确定了几个主要主题,包括提供死产护理的产科医生所经历的情感负担、不良结局后医患互动的挑战以及支持和资源的缺乏。全球各地的产科医生在死产后都会感到悲痛、内疚、自责和个人责任感。产科医生努力应对对其整体护理工作所寄予的期望带来的负担,并往往质疑自己的专业能力。一部分产科医生对死产后医患互动的复杂性感到准备不足。

结论

产科医生经历了复杂且相互矛盾的情绪,称处理死产病例带来了沉重的情感负担。产科医生指出,在整个医疗环境中,缺乏提供丧亲护理的培训和支持,这表明全球产科培训项目中的死产和丧亲护理干预及教育应填补这一空白。丧亲护理培训基础设施和产科医生支持系统对于提高死产和围产期死亡护理质量以及防止全球范围内妇女护理所需医疗人员外流至关重要。

相似文献

1
How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.产科医生如何经历死产和围产期死亡:一项系统评价和元综合分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 16;5(2):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Lived experience of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.妊娠高血压疾病的生活体验:系统评价和荟萃综合。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Nov;6(11):101494. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101494. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Care and support when a baby is stillborn: A systematic review and an interpretive meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in high-income countries.当婴儿死产时的护理和支持:高收入国家定性研究的系统评价和解释性元分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289617. eCollection 2023.
6
Bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately following perinatal loss: a scoping review.产后期丧失后医疗保健机构使用的丧亲护理指南:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):2003-2089. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00149.
7
Antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth, fetal loss and perinatal death: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.产前干预以预防死产、胎儿丢失和围产儿死亡:Cochrane 系统评价概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD009599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009599.pub2.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
The impact of stillbirth on consultant obstetrician gynaecologists: a qualitative study.死产对妇产科顾问医生的影响:一项定性研究。
BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):1020-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12695. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth.使死产可见:全球报告的死产原因的系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):212-224. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14971. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
'Stories of Loss'-Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students.《失落的故事》——为医学生设计并评估一项由患者主导的围产期丧亲照护项目
Clin Teach. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70146. doi: 10.1111/tct.70146.

本文引用的文献

1
Partners in Pain, Two Sides of a Zipper - Midwives' Experiences With Stillbirth: A Qualitative Study.疼痛的伙伴,拉链的两面——助产士关于死产的经历:一项定性研究
Omega (Westport). 2024 Feb 25:302228241235429. doi: 10.1177/00302228241235429.
2
"If You Need a Psychiatrist, It's BAD": Stigma Associated with Seeking Mental Health Care Among Obstetric Providers in Ghana.“如果你需要精神科医生,那就糟糕了”:加纳产科医护人员中与寻求心理健康护理相关的污名化现象
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jan 24;16:131-141. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S440224. eCollection 2024.
3
Implementation and effectiveness of a physician-focused peer support program.医师导向的同伴支持计划的实施与成效。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):e0292917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292917. eCollection 2023.
4
An exploration of health workers' experiences in providing bereavement care to mothers following a stillbirth: results from a subnational level health system in Uganda.探讨乌干达国家以下一级卫生系统中卫生工作者在为死胎后丧子的母亲提供哀伤护理方面的经验:结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05913-x.
5
Care and support when a baby is stillborn: A systematic review and an interpretive meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in high-income countries.当婴儿死产时的护理和支持:高收入国家定性研究的系统评价和解释性元分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289617. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of an online education program for healthcare professionals on best practice management of perinatal deaths: IMPROVE eLearning.评价一个针对医疗保健专业人员的在线教育项目,该项目针对围产期死亡的最佳实践管理:改善电子学习。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Feb;64(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13743. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
7
A cross-sectional analysis of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the United States.美国母胎医学医师共情疲劳、倦怠和共情满足的横断面分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100989. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100989. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
8
Factors associated with compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses: A cross-sectional study.妇产科护士共情疲劳和共情满足感的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5509-5520. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1790. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
The use of peer support groups for emergency physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间为急诊医生提供同伴支持小组服务。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Feb 19;4(1):e12897. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12897. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Perfectionism as a predictor of physician burnout.完美主义是医生倦怠的预测指标。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):1425. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08785-7.