Burke R E
Mol Pharmacol. 1986 Jul;30(1):58-68.
Whereas classic muscarinic antagonist ligands appear to recognize only a single class of muscarinic receptor sites, the recently discovered antagonist pirenzepine appears to distinguish at least two classes of sites. Its unique binding properties, demonstrated in both indirect and direct binding studies, have led to an emerging concept of high affinity (M1) and low affinity (M2) sites. This concept has been supported by pharmacologic studies of functional muscarinic responses, as well as by data suggesting different effector relationships for the two sites. Gallamine possesses muscarinic antagonist properties, and it also recognizes heterogeneity among muscarinic receptors. The purpose of this study was to define gallamine-recognized heterogeneity in terms of the pirenzepine-defined M1, M2 concept. This has been done by studying the ability of gallamine to inhibit [3H]pirenzepine binding to the M1 site, and to inhibit [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate ([3H]QNB) binding in cerebellar membrane preparations, which contain almost exclusively the M2 site. The results show that gallamine binds with high affinity to the M2 site, with Ki = 2.4 nM, and lower affinity to the M1 site with Ki = 24 nM. Within these classes gallamine does not recognize heterogeneity. The ability of gallamine to inhibit [3H]QNB binding to cortex is best described by a two-site model comprised of 77% low affinity gallamine sites (M1) and 23% high affinity gallamine sites (M2). Thus, the heterogeneity among muscarinic receptors which is recognized by gallamine within the receptor binding paradigms of this study can be attributed to the M1, M2 subtypes as defined by pirenzepine binding. In addition, gallamine at low concentrations appears to bind as a pure competitive antagonist at these two sites, indicated by linear Schild plots with slopes of 1.0, the lack of an effect on dissociation of radioligands, and the ability to protect [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]QNB-binding sites from alkylation by propylbenzylcholine mustard. These studies do not exclude the possibility of a non-competitive interaction of gallamine with the muscarinic receptor observed by other investigators at high gallamine concentrations, and postulated to occur at a site adjacent to the primary muscarinic site. It is proposed that gallamine is capable of interacting with both the primary muscarinic site and an allosteric site. These results support the emerging concept of M1 and M2 muscarinic subclasses and suggest that gallamine and related compounds may be useful in defining muscarinic receptor subclasses, given their higher affinity for the M2 site.
传统的毒蕈碱拮抗剂配体似乎只能识别一类毒蕈碱受体位点,而最近发现的拮抗剂哌仑西平似乎能区分至少两类位点。在间接和直接结合研究中均得到证实的其独特结合特性,引出了高亲和力(M1)和低亲和力(M2)位点这一新兴概念。这一概念得到了功能性毒蕈碱反应药理学研究的支持,以及表明这两类位点具有不同效应关系的数据的支持。加拉明具有毒蕈碱拮抗剂特性,它也能识别毒蕈碱受体之间的异质性。本研究的目的是根据哌仑西平定义的M1、M2概念来界定加拉明识别的异质性。这是通过研究加拉明抑制[3H]哌仑西平与M1位点结合的能力,以及抑制[3H]喹核醇基苯甲酸酯([3H]QNB)在几乎只含M2位点的小脑膜制剂中的结合能力来实现的。结果表明,加拉明与M2位点具有高亲和力,Ki = 2.4 nM,与M1位点的亲和力较低,Ki = 24 nM。在这些类别中,加拉明未识别出异质性。加拉明抑制[3H]QNB与皮质结合的能力最好用一个双位点模型来描述,该模型由77%的低亲和力加拉明位点(M1)和23%的高亲和力加拉明位点(M2)组成。因此,在本研究的受体结合模式中,加拉明识别的毒蕈碱受体之间的异质性可归因于哌仑西平结合所定义的M1、M2亚型。此外,低浓度的加拉明似乎在这两个位点以纯竞争性拮抗剂的形式结合,这表现为斜率为1.0的线性Schild图、对放射性配体解离无影响以及能够保护[3H]哌仑西平和[3H]QNB结合位点免受丙基苄基胆碱芥子碱的烷基化作用。这些研究并未排除其他研究者在高加拉明浓度下观察到的加拉明与毒蕈碱受体的非竞争性相互作用的可能性,并且推测这种相互作用发生在初级毒蕈碱位点附近的一个位点。有人提出加拉明能够与初级毒蕈碱位点和一个变构位点相互作用。这些结果支持了M1和M2毒蕈碱亚类这一新兴概念,并表明加拉明及相关化合物鉴于其对M2位点具有更高的亲和力,可能有助于界定毒蕈碱受体亚类。