Deffner G
Psychiatry Res. 1986 Jun;18(2):151-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(86)90027-2.
Different types of errors during the various steps of Gottschalk-Gleser content analysis of speech samples are discussed. Several attempts have been made in the past to avoid error by using computer programs to categorize verbal material. Although these systems offer the advantage of increasing reliability to a maximum, validity is a problem. More recent approaches, which use artificial intelligence methods of language understanding by computer, show promise. However, these computer systems will have to be further developed before they can perform at the same level as human raters. For this reason, an alternative approach is presented which only relies on computers in a limited way: All steps of Gottschalk-Gleser content analysis are performed with a collection of programs on a small 8-bit microcomputer: transcription, scoring, storage, and computation of scores. The different steps of using this system are described, and it is argued that a significant reduction of error, both random and systematic, can be achieved through this system.
本文讨论了在对言语样本进行戈特沙尔克 - 格莱泽内容分析的各个步骤中出现的不同类型错误。过去曾多次尝试通过使用计算机程序对言语材料进行分类来避免错误。尽管这些系统具有将可靠性最大化的优势,但有效性仍是一个问题。最近的方法是利用计算机的人工智能语言理解方法,显示出了前景。然而,这些计算机系统在达到与人类评分者相同的水平之前还需要进一步开发。因此,本文提出了一种仅在有限程度上依赖计算机的替代方法:戈特沙尔克 - 格莱泽内容分析的所有步骤都通过一组程序在一台小型8位微型计算机上执行:转录、评分、存储和分数计算。文中描述了使用该系统的不同步骤,并认为通过该系统可以显著减少随机和系统误差。