• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从第 3 区到第 1 区行主动脉球囊阻断复苏术治疗持续出血性休克所致的血流动力学崩溃

Transition of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta from Zone 3 to Zone 1 to Treat Hemodynamic Collapse during Continued Hemorrhage.

机构信息

Office of Science and Technology, 59th Medical Wing, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236, USA.

Division of Vascular Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2024 Jan 23;189(1-2):e285-e290. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad313.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usad313
PMID:37552642
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) accounts for most potentially survivable deaths on the battlefield. Treatment of NCTH is challenging, especially in far-forward environments with limited capabilities. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has shown promise in the care of patients with NCTH. REBOA involves introducing a balloon catheter into the descending aorta in a specific occlusion region (zones 1, 2, or 3) and acts as a hemorrhage control adjunct with resuscitative support. The balloon is placed in zone 3 in the infrarenal aorta for high junctional or pelvic injuries and in zone 1 proximal to the diaphragm for torso hemorrhage. Zone 1 REBOA provides more resuscitative support than zone 3; however, the potential for ischemia and reperfusion injuries is greater with zone 1 than with zone 3 REBOA placement. This study aims to determine the possible benefit of transitioning the REBOA balloon from zone 3 to zone 1 to rescue a patient with ongoing venous bleeding and impending cardiovascular collapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yorkshire male swine (70-90 kg, n = 6 per group) underwent injury to the femoral artery, which was allowed to bleed freely for 60 s, along with a simultaneous controlled venous hemorrhage. After 60 s, the arterial bleed was controlled with hemostatic gauze and zone 3 REBOA was inflated. Five hundred milliliters of Hextend was used for initial fluid resuscitation. The controlled venous bleed continued until a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 30 mmHg was reached to create an impending cardiovascular collapse. The animals were then randomized into either continued zone 3 REBOA or transition from zone 3 to zone 1 REBOA. Following 30 min, a "hospital phase" was initiated, consisting of cessation of the venous hemorrhage, deflation of the REBOA balloon, and transfusion of one unit of whole blood administered along with saline and norepinephrine to maintain a MAP of 60 mmHg or higher. The animals then underwent a 2-h observation period. Survival, hemodynamics, and blood chemistries were compared between groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences between groups were observed in hemodynamic or laboratory values at baseline, postinitial injury, or when MAP reached 30 mmHg. Survival was significantly longer in animals that transitioned into zone 1 REBOA (log-rank analysis, P = .012). The average time of survival was 14 ± 10 min for zone 3 animals vs. 65 ± 59 min for zone 1 animals (P = .064). No animals in the zone 3 group survived to the hospital phase. Zone 1-treated animals showed immediate hemodynamic improvement after transition, with maximum blood pressure reaching near baseline values compared to those in the zone 3 group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this swine model of NCTH, hemodynamics and survival were improved when the REBOA balloon was transitioned from zone 3 to zone 1 during an impending cardiovascular collapse. Furthermore, these improved outcome data support the pursuit of additional research into mitigating ischemia-reperfusion insult to the abdominal viscera while still providing excellent resuscitative support, such as intermittent or partial REBOA.

摘要

简介

非压缩性躯干出血(NCTH)是战场上大多数潜在可存活死亡的主要原因。NCTH 的治疗具有挑战性,尤其是在远前沿环境中,其能力有限。主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)在 NCTH 患者的治疗中显示出了希望。REBOA 通过将球囊导管引入特定的阻塞区域(区域 1、2 或 3)的降主动脉,作为复苏支持的辅助手段来控制出血。球囊在肾下主动脉中的区域 3 用于高连接或骨盆损伤,在区域 1 中靠近横膈膜用于躯干出血。区域 1 的 REBOA 比区域 3 提供更多的复苏支持;然而,与区域 3 REBOA 放置相比,区域 1 的缺血再灌注损伤的可能性更大。本研究旨在确定将 REBOA 球囊从区域 3 转换为区域 1 以抢救持续静脉出血和即将发生心血管崩溃的患者的可能益处。

材料和方法

约克郡雄性猪(70-90kg,每组 6 只)的股动脉受伤,允许其自由出血 60s,同时进行持续的控制静脉出血。60s 后,用止血纱布控制动脉出血,并使区域 3 的 REBOA 充气。最初使用 500 毫升羟乙基淀粉进行液体复苏。持续控制静脉出血,直到平均动脉压(MAP)达到 30mmHg,以造成即将发生的心血管崩溃。然后,动物随机分为继续区域 3 REBOA 或从区域 3 过渡到区域 1 REBOA。30min 后,开始“医院阶段”,包括停止静脉出血、放气 REBOA 球囊以及输注 1 单位全血,同时输注生理盐水和去甲肾上腺素以维持 MAP 为 60mmHg 或更高。然后,动物接受 2 小时的观察期。比较各组之间的存活、血流动力学和血液化学。

结果

在基线、初始损伤后或 MAP 达到 30mmHg 时,各组之间的血流动力学或实验室值均无显著差异。过渡到区域 1 REBOA 的动物存活率明显更长(对数秩分析,P=0.012)。区域 3 动物的平均存活时间为 14±10min,而区域 1 动物的平均存活时间为 65±59min(P=0.064)。区域 3 组无动物存活到医院阶段。区域 1 治疗的动物在过渡后立即出现血流动力学改善,最大血压达到接近基线值,而区域 3 组则相反。

结论

在这个 NCTH 猪模型中,当在即将发生的心血管崩溃期间将 REBOA 球囊从区域 3 过渡到区域 1 时,血流动力学和存活率得到改善。此外,这些改善的结果数据支持进一步研究减轻腹部内脏的缺血再灌注损伤,同时仍提供出色的复苏支持,如间歇性或部分 REBOA。

相似文献

1
Transition of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta from Zone 3 to Zone 1 to Treat Hemodynamic Collapse during Continued Hemorrhage.从第 3 区到第 1 区行主动脉球囊阻断复苏术治疗持续出血性休克所致的血流动力学崩溃
Mil Med. 2024 Jan 23;189(1-2):e285-e290. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad313.
2
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for thoracic trauma: A translational swine study.主动脉腔内球囊阻断复苏在胸部创伤中的应用:一项转化猪研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Sep;89(3):474-481. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002749.
3
Extending the golden hour for Zone 1 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Improved survival and reperfusion injury with intermittent versus continuous resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta of the aorta in a porcine severe truncal hemorrhage model.延长黄金时间行 1 区主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术:在猪严重躯干出血模型中,与主动脉持续复苏性血管内球囊阻断术相比,间断性主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术可改善存活率和再灌注损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Aug;85(2):318-326. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001964.
4
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for major abdominal venous injury in a porcine hemorrhagic shock model.猪失血性休克模型中用于严重腹部静脉损伤的主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Aug;83(2):230-236. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001548.
5
Increased crystalloid fluid requirements during zone 3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) versus Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) after class II hemorrhage in swine.在 II 级出血后,与腹部主动脉和交界处止血带(AAJT)相比,猪的 3 区复苏性血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)期间晶体液需求增加。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):335-344. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01592-x. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC) versus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a swine model of hemorrhage and ischemia reperfusion injury.血管内可变主动脉控制(EVAC)与复苏性血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)在出血和缺血再灌注损伤猪模型中的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):519-526. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002008.
7
Location is everything: The hemodynamic effects of REBOA in Zone 1 versus Zone 3 of the aorta.位置至关重要:REBOA 在主动脉 1 区与 3 区的血液动力学效应。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):101-107. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001858.
8
Comparison of zone 3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a model of junctional hemorrhage in swine.猪交界性出血模型中主动脉3区复苏性血管内球囊阻断术与腹主动脉及交界性止血带的比较。
J Surg Res. 2018 Jun;226:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.039. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
9
Preperitoneal balloon tamponade and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Alternatives to open packing for pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage.腹膜前球囊填塞和主动脉抢救性血管内球囊阻断:用于骨盆骨折相关出血的开放式填塞的替代方法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002266.
10
Abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet versus zone III resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a swine junctional hemorrhage model.腹部主动脉和交界处止血带与区域 III 复苏性血管内球囊阻断主动脉在猪交界处出血模型中的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):292-297. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002553.