From the Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio (J.J.G., L.E.N., C.G.M., S.C.), San Antonio Military Medical Center (J.J.G., K.S.S.), JBSA-Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas; and Riverside University Health System (M.B.), Riverside, California.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Sep;89(3):474-481. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002749.
Noncompressible torso hemorrhage in trauma is particularly lethal. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has the potential to stabilize these patients, but currently is contraindicated for major thoracic bleeding. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of REBOA on the hemodynamic and metabolic profile as well as its effect on early survival in a porcine model of thoracic hemorrhage and shock.
Forty-eight male Yorkshire swine (60-80 kg) underwent 30% hemorrhage and were randomized to three thoracic injuries, with and without zone 1 REBOA occlusion: pulmonary parenchymal injury, thoracic venous injury, or subclavian artery injury. Following hemorrhage, thoracic injuries were induced (time of major thoracic injury) and allowed to bleed freely. The REBOA groups had zone 1 occlusion after the thoracic injury, with deflation at the end of prehospital. All groups had whole blood resuscitation at the end of prehospital and were euthanized at end of the hospital care phase. Survival, total blood loss, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal CO2, and arterial blood gas parameters were analyzed. Statistical significance was determined by t tests and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.
The use of REBOA improved the hemodynamics in all three injury patterns, with no differences observed in the outcomes of short-term survival and thoracic blood loss between the REBOA and non-REBOA groups. All groups showed equivalent changes in markers of shock (pH, HCO3, and base excess) prior to resuscitation.
In this animal study of hemorrhage and major thoracic bleeding, the addition of zone 1 REBOA did not significantly affect short-term survival or blood loss, while providing hemodynamic stabilization. Therefore, in noncompressible thoracic bleeding, without immediate surgical capability, long-term outcomes may be improved with REBOA, and thoracic hemorrhage should not be considered contraindications to REBOA use.
评估主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)对猪模型胸部出血和休克时血流动力学和代谢特征的影响及其对早期存活率的影响。
48 只雄性约克夏猪(60-80kg)进行 30%的出血,并随机分为三组胸部损伤,有和没有区域 1 REBOA 闭塞:肺实质损伤、胸部静脉损伤或锁骨下动脉损伤。出血后,诱导胸部损伤(主要胸部损伤时间)并允许自由出血。REBOA 组在胸部损伤后进行区域 1 闭塞,并在院前结束时放气。所有组均在院前结束时进行全血复苏,并在医院治疗阶段结束时安乐死。分析存活率、总失血量、平均动脉压、呼气末 CO2 和动脉血气参数。通过 t 检验和双向重复测量方差分析确定统计学意义。
REBOA 的使用改善了所有三种损伤模式的血流动力学,在短期存活率和胸部出血量方面,REBOA 和非 REBOA 组之间没有差异。在复苏前,所有组的休克标志物(pH、HCO3 和碱剩余)均发生等效变化。
在本项关于出血和主要胸部出血的动物研究中,区域 1 REBOA 的添加并未显著影响短期存活率或失血量,同时提供了血流动力学稳定。因此,在非压迫性胸部出血且无即时手术能力的情况下,REBOA 的使用可能会改善长期结果,且不应将胸部出血视为 REBOA 使用的禁忌症。