• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳肿瘤突变负荷截断值作为预测程序性细胞死亡蛋白1检查点抑制剂在晚期胃癌中疗效的新型标志物

The Optimal Tumor Mutational Burden Cutoff Value as a Novel Marker for Predicting the Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Gastric Cancer.

作者信息

Jang Jae Yeon, Jeon Youngkyung, Jeong Sun Young, Lim Sung Hee, Kang Won Ki, Lee Jeeyun, Kim Seung Tae

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;23(3):476-486. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e29.

DOI:10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e29
PMID:37553133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10412974/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimal tumor mutational burden (TMB) value for predicting treatment response to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the optimal TMB cutoff value that could predict the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors in AGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with AGC who received pembrolizumab or nivolumab between October 1, 2020, and July 27, 2021, at Samsung Medical Center in Korea were retrospectively analyzed. The TMB levels were measured using a next-generation sequencing assay. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the TMB cutoff value was determined.

RESULTS

A total 53 patients were analyzed. The TMB cutoff value for predicting the overall response rate (ORR) to PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors was defined as 13.31 mutations per megabase (mt/Mb) with 56% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Based on this definition, 7 (13.2%) patients were TMB-high (TMB-H). The ORR differed between the TMB-low (TMB-L) and TMB-H (8.7% vs. 71.4%, P=0.001). The progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) for 53 patients were 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.600-2.268) and 4.26 months (95% CI, 2.992-5.532). The median OS was longer in the TMB-H (20.8 months; 95% CI, 2.292-39.281) than in the TMB-L (3.31 months; 95% CI, 1.604-5.019; P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The TMB cutoff value for predicting treatment response in AGC patients who received PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as salvage treatment was 13.31 mt/Mb. When applying the programmed death ligand-1 status to TMB-H, patients who would benefit from PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors can be selected.

摘要

目的

预测晚期胃癌(AGC)对程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)检查点抑制剂治疗反应的最佳肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)值仍不清楚。我们旨在研究能够预测PD-1检查点抑制剂在AGC中疗效的最佳TMB临界值。

材料与方法

对2020年10月1日至2021年7月27日期间在韩国三星医疗中心接受帕博利珠单抗或纳武利尤单抗治疗的AGC患者进行回顾性分析。使用二代测序检测法测量TMB水平。基于受试者工作特征曲线分析确定TMB临界值。

结果

共分析了53例患者。预测对PD-1检查点抑制剂的总缓解率(ORR)的TMB临界值定义为每兆碱基13.31个突变(mt/Mb),敏感性为56%,特异性为95%。基于此定义,7例(13.2%)患者为高TMB(TMB-H)。低TMB(TMB-L)组和TMB-H组的ORR不同(8.7%对71.4%,P=0.001)。53例患者的无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)分别为1.93个月(95%置信区间[CI],1.600-2.268)和4.26个月(95%CI,2.992-5.532)。TMB-H组的中位OS(20.8个月;95%CI,2.292-39.281)长于TMB-L组(3.31个月;95%CI,1.604-5.019;P=0.049)。

结论

在接受PD-1检查点抑制剂单药挽救治疗的AGC患者中,预测治疗反应的TMB临界值为13.31 mt/Mb。当将程序性死亡配体1状态应用于TMB-H时,可以选择可能从PD-1检查点抑制剂中获益的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/5ddada4e8f2b/jgc-23-476-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/50d71fb2bf29/jgc-23-476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/d375fb059d64/jgc-23-476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/5ddada4e8f2b/jgc-23-476-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/50d71fb2bf29/jgc-23-476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/d375fb059d64/jgc-23-476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43a/10412974/5ddada4e8f2b/jgc-23-476-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Optimal Tumor Mutational Burden Cutoff Value as a Novel Marker for Predicting the Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Gastric Cancer.最佳肿瘤突变负荷截断值作为预测程序性细胞死亡蛋白1检查点抑制剂在晚期胃癌中疗效的新型标志物
J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;23(3):476-486. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e29.
2
Tumor Mutational Burden Determined by Panel Sequencing Predicts Survival After Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.通过panel测序确定的肿瘤突变负荷可预测晚期胃癌患者免疫治疗后的生存情况。
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 13;10:314. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00314. eCollection 2020.
3
Association of Survival and Immune-Related Biomarkers With Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Individual Patient-Level Analysis.免疫治疗与非小细胞肺癌患者生存及免疫相关生物标志物的相关性:一项荟萃分析和个体患者水平分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6879.
4
Universal cutoff for tumor mutational burden in predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy for advanced cancers.肿瘤突变负荷在预测抗PD-(L)1疗法对晚期癌症疗效中的通用临界值。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 May 25;11:1209243. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1209243. eCollection 2023.
5
Tumor mutational burden predicts the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy: a pan-tumor retrospective analysis of participants with advanced solid tumors.肿瘤突变负荷预测 pembrolizumab 单药治疗的疗效:一项晚期实体瘤患者的泛肿瘤回顾性分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003091.
6
Predictive Value of Combining Biomarkers for Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.联合生物标志物预测接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者临床结局的价值。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Nov;22(6):500-509. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
7
Interplay between Tumor Mutational Burden and Mutational Profile and Its Effect on Overall Survival: A Pilot Study of Metastatic Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.肿瘤突变负荷与突变谱之间的相互作用及其对总生存期的影响:一项接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的转移性患者的初步研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 4;14(21):5433. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215433.
8
Response Rates to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Microsatellite-Stable Solid Tumors With 10 or More Mutations per Megabase.每兆碱基 10 个或更多突变的微卫星稳定实体瘤对抗 PD-1 免疫治疗的反应率。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):739-743. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7684.
9
The Predictive Value of Tumor Mutation Burden on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肿瘤突变负荷对癌症中免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 5;9:1161. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01161. eCollection 2019.
10
First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(CheckMate 568):程序性死亡配体 1 和肿瘤突变负荷作为生物标志物的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):992-1000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01042. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach.《2022年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法》
J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;23(1):3-106. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11.
2
Association of PD-L1 Expression and Other Variables With Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 17 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.PD-L1 表达与其他变量与晚期胃食管交界癌免疫检查点抑制获益的关系:17 项 3 期随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Oct 1;8(10):1456-1465. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3707.
3
Pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability high or mismatch repair deficient cancers: updated analysis from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study.
帕博利珠单抗治疗微卫星高度不稳定或错配修复缺陷型癌症:来自 II 期 KEYNOTE-158 研究的更新分析。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(9):929-938. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.519. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of nivolumab as ≥ 3-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a subset analysis of ATTRACTION-2 phase III trial.晚期胃癌患者接受纳武利尤单抗作为≥3 线治疗的疗效预测生物标志物:ATTRACTION-2 期 III 期试验的亚组分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09488-2.
5
Evaluation of the TruSight Oncology 500 Assay for Routine Clinical Testing of Tumor Mutational Burden and Clinical Utility for Predicting Response to Pembrolizumab.TruSight Oncology 500 assay 用于肿瘤突变负荷常规临床检测的评估及其对预测帕博利珠单抗反应的临床实用性。
J Mol Diagn. 2022 Jun;24(6):600-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, untreated, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ATTRACTION-4): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.纳武利尤单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阴性、未经治疗、不可切除的晚期或复发性胃或胃食管结合部腺癌患者(ATTRACTION-4):一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Feb;23(2):234-247. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00692-6. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.一线纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗晚期胃癌、胃食管交界癌和食管腺癌(CheckMate 649):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):27-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00797-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
8
A novel genomic classification system of gastric cancer via integrating multidimensional genomic characteristics.一种通过整合多维基因组特征的胃癌新型基因组分类系统。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Nov;24(6):1227-1241. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01201-9. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
9
Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer.胃癌的当前治疗方法和最新进展。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):264-279. doi: 10.3322/caac.21657. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Phase III Trial of Avelumab Maintenance After First-Line Induction Chemotherapy Versus Continuation of Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric Cancers: Results From JAVELIN Gastric 100.avelumab 维持治疗用于一线诱导化疗后与继续化疗相比用于胃癌患者的 III 期临床试验:JAVELIN Gastric 100 的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 20;39(9):966-977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00892. Epub 2020 Nov 16.