• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经食品和药物管理局报告的经颈动脉血管重建术引起的颈动脉夹层

Carotid artery dissections from transcarotid artery revascularization as reported by the Food and Drug Administration.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Vascular. 2024 Dec;32(6):1291-1294. doi: 10.1177/17085381231194410. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1177/17085381231194410
PMID:37553285
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid procedure that allows reversal of blood flow away from the brain while placing a stent through direct surgical access of the common carotid artery. It has been shown to have a lower risk of perioperative stroke compared with any prospective trial of transfemoral carotid artery stenting. However, intraoperative injuries related to the procedure and its management are not well characterized. One of the intraoperative complications seen in TCAR is iatrogenic carotid artery dissection (CD). We aim to add qualitative insight in further characterizing CDs and its management in this emerging technology.

METHODS

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for surveillance of all medical devices approved for use. This database was queried for all cases associated with Silk Road Medical's ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System from September 2016 to October 2020. Case narratives related to CD were individually analyzed to determine time of injury (intraoperative, recovery, and post-discharge follow-up). CD reporting was further analyzed for the associated procedural event at the time of injury, number of access attempts to CD repair, and type of CD repair. Reports associated with CD repair were further categorized into endovascular repair and open surgical repair.

RESULTS

Of the 115 unique adverse events in the database, there were 58 CDs. Most were identified intraoperatively ( = 55), while three were incidentally found postoperatively. Overall, sheath placement was the most common procedural event attributed to CD ( = 34). There was adequate narrative information about CD repair in 54 patients. Intraoperative repair was performed in 52 cases and two were repaired after post-discharge follow-up imaging was performed.Among CDs that did not require additional access to engage the true lumen, the proportion of endovascular repair (62.5%) was significantly higher ( = .044) compared to the proportion of open surgical repair (37.5%). However, the proportion of open surgical repair (75%) was significantly higher than the proportion of endovascular repair (25%) in CDs with persistent failure to engage the true lumen despite ≥2 access attempts ( = .039).

CONCLUSION

CD is the most common injury related to TCAR as reported on MAUDE. The most commonly reported procedural event associated with CD was sheath placement. The rate of intraoperative endovascular and open surgical CD repair was associated with whether the access to the true lumen of the carotid artery required additional access attempts or not. This should add qualitative insight among the vascular surgery community regarding intraoperative management of CDs from a TCAR procedure.

摘要

目的

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)是一种混合手术,它允许在通过直接手术进入颈总动脉放置支架的同时将血流从大脑中反向引导。与任何前瞻性的股动脉颈动脉支架置入术相比,它具有较低的围手术期中风风险。然而,与该手术及其管理相关的术中损伤尚未得到很好的描述。TCAR 术中出现的一种并发症是医源性颈动脉夹层(CD)。我们的目的是在这一新兴技术中,通过定性的方法进一步描述 CD 及其处理方法。

方法

食品和药物管理局(FDA)维护着制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库,用于监测所有获得批准使用的医疗器械。对 2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 10 月期间与 Silk Road Medical 的 ENROUTE 经颈动脉神经保护系统相关的所有病例进行了 MAUDE 数据库查询。对与 CD 相关的个案叙述进行了单独分析,以确定损伤时间(术中、恢复中和出院后随访)。进一步分析 CD 报告中与损伤时相关的程序事件、修复 CD 的尝试次数和 CD 修复类型。与 CD 修复相关的报告进一步分为血管内修复和开放手术修复。

结果

在数据库中的 115 个独特的不良事件中,有 58 个是 CD。大多数在术中发现(n=55),有 3 例是在术后意外发现的。总的来说,鞘的放置是与 CD 最相关的程序事件(n=34)。在 54 例患者中,有足够的 CD 修复叙述信息。52 例在术中进行了修复,2 例在出院后随访影像学检查后进行了修复。在不需要进一步进入真腔来修复 CD 的病例中,血管内修复(62.5%)的比例明显高于开放手术修复(37.5%)(p=0.044)。然而,在尽管尝试了≥2 次进入真腔但仍未能进入的 CD 病例中,开放手术修复(75%)的比例明显高于血管内修复(25%)(p=0.039)。

结论

CD 是 MAUDE 报告中与 TCA 相关的最常见损伤。与 CD 最相关的程序事件是鞘的放置。是否需要进一步进入颈动脉真腔来修复 CD,与术中进行血管内和开放手术修复 CD 的比例有关。这应该为血管外科学领域提供关于 TCA 手术中 CD 术中管理的定性见解。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery dissections from transcarotid artery revascularization as reported by the Food and Drug Administration.经食品和药物管理局报告的经颈动脉血管重建术引起的颈动脉夹层
Vascular. 2024 Dec;32(6):1291-1294. doi: 10.1177/17085381231194410. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
2
The learning curve of transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.115. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
3
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Analysis of the ROADSTER pivotal and extended-access cohorts shows excellent 1-year durability of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER 关键和扩展准入队列分析显示,使用动态血流反转行颈动脉支架术具有优异的 1 年耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1786-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.179. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Outcomes associated with a transcarotid artery revascularization-centered protocol in high-risk carotid revascularizations using the ENROUTE neuroprotection system.使用 ENROUTE 神经保护系统进行高危颈动脉血运重建时,以经颈动脉动脉血运重建为中心的方案相关结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):807-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.222. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
8
A multi-institutional analysis of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to carotid endarterectomy.多机构分析经颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.060. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
9
Low-frequency avoidable errors during transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术过程中的低频可避免性错误。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1658-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization with dynamic flow reversal in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion.经颈动脉血运重建术伴对侧颈动脉闭塞时的动态血流反转的转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):524-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.529. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Thrombectomy and stenting of pseudoaneurysm from transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术后假性动脉瘤的血栓切除术和支架置入术。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 12;15:127. doi: 10.25259/SNI_71_2024. eCollection 2024.