Department of Systems Biology, Laboratory of Visual Neurophysiology, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Ophthalmology, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria-Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB-Arrixaca), University of Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Discov Med. 2023 Aug;35(177):553-564. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202335177.56.
To evaluate the effects of various retinal neurotransmitters on temporal resolution, particularly, on the Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency (CFF), which has been previously applied in ophthalmic pathophysiologic research.
A binocular physiologic electroretinogram was performed on adult mice. Animals in the control group were injected in the right eye with 1 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Animals in the experimental group were injected in the left eye with 1 μL of PBS and in the right eye with 1 μL of PBS to which different molecules were added: 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB), Glutamate, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX), Bicuculline, Glycine, and 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES). Initially, rod response was recorded and later the cone response.
APB suppressed the rod-driven, but not the cone-driven flicker response. The other agents severely affected the lower flickering frequency response amplitude, in particular, at 3 Hz. The threshold of CFF was lowered from 50 Hz to 40 Hz after applying APB, Glycine, and HEPES. GABA remarkably enhanced rod-driven and cone-driven flicker response at 3 Hz, whereas Glutamate and GABA/Glutamate only did in rod-driven flicker response.
Both ON and OFF visual pathways were implied in cone-driven response, but only the ON visual pathway appears to play a relevant role in rod-driven flicker response. Flicker response seems to be enhanced by horizontal cells both in rod-driven and cone-driven response. In addition, due to the greater sensitivity of the flicker at low frequencies, it is suggested that pathophysiological studies should be carried out at said frequencies.
评估各种视网膜神经递质对时间分辨率的影响,特别是对临界闪烁融合频率(CFF)的影响,该频率已在前眼部病理生理研究中应用。
对成年小鼠进行双眼生理视网膜电图检查。对照组动物右眼注射 1 μL 磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)。实验组动物左眼注射 1 μL PBS,右眼注射 1 μL PBS,其中添加了不同的分子:2-氨基-4-膦酸丁酸(APB)、谷氨酸、γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)、6,7-二硝基喹喔啉-2,3-二酮(DNQX)、印防己毒素、甘氨酸和 4-(2-羟乙基)-1-哌嗪乙磺酸(HEPES)。最初记录视杆细胞反应,然后记录视锥细胞反应。
APB 抑制视杆细胞驱动的闪烁反应,但不抑制视锥细胞驱动的闪烁反应。其他药物严重影响较低闪烁频率响应幅度,特别是在 3 Hz 时。应用 APB、Glycine 和 HEPES 后,CFF 的阈值从 50 Hz 降低到 40 Hz。GABA 显著增强 3 Hz 时的视杆细胞和视锥细胞驱动的闪烁反应,而谷氨酸和 GABA/谷氨酸仅对视杆细胞驱动的闪烁反应有影响。
ON 和 OFF 视觉通路都参与了视锥细胞驱动的反应,但只有 ON 视觉通路似乎在视杆细胞驱动的闪烁反应中发挥相关作用。闪烁反应似乎通过水平细胞增强,无论是在视杆细胞驱动还是视锥细胞驱动的反应中。此外,由于低频闪烁的敏感性更高,建议在所述频率下进行病理生理研究。