Suppr超能文献

血清学在乳糜泻诊断中的作用。

The role of serology in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.

作者信息

Volta Umberto, Bai Julio Cesar, De Giorgio Roberto

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.

Institute of Investigations, University of Salvador, Gastroenterology Consultant, Hospital Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(2):118-128. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2713.

Abstract

Serology has significantly revolutionized the knowledge of celiac disease (CD), leading to the identification of unsuspected patients in at-risk CD groups, thereby increasing the number of CD diagnoses compared to the pre-screening era. Several markers for CD with a progressive diagnostic accuracy have been identified over the years, but only three of them, i.e. anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), anti-endomysial (EmA) and anti-deamidated gliadin antibodies (DGP) are currently assessed in the daily clinical practice. A thorough review of the literature identified 44 original studies published between 1998 to 2022 for a total of 5098 pediatric and adult CD patients (without selective IgA deficiency) and 11930 disease controls. The results highlighted that anti-tTG IgA exhibited a higher sensitivity for CD (93.4%) than EmA IgA (92.8%), DGP IgG (81.8%) and DGP IgA (83.8%). The specificity of EmA IgA (99%) resulted to be higher than those of anti-tTG IgA (95.8%), DGP IgG (96.4%) and DGP IgA (92.1%). In patients with selective IgA deficiency, a condition closely related to CD, serological screening should include one of the three antibodies of IgG class, since anti-tTG, DGP and EmA have a very similar diagnostic accuracy in this clinical setting. According to age, there are two main diagnostic strategies for CD detection. In children, the revised ESPGHAN 2020 guidelines established that CD could be diagnosed in both symptomatic and asymptomatic children by high anti-tTG IgA titers (>10 times the cut-off) and EmA positivity with no need to obtain duodenal biopsy and HLA typing. In adult patients, although high tTG IgA titers (confirmed by EmA IgA positivity) correlate with villous atrophy, an intestinal biopsy is still considered mandatory for confirming CD diagnosis. Currently, a case finding approach in at-risk groups is preferred to mass screening for CD detection.

摘要

血清学显著革新了我们对乳糜泻(CD)的认识,使得在高危CD群体中识别出未被怀疑的患者,从而相比筛查前时代增加了CD的诊断数量。多年来已确定了几种诊断准确性不断提高的CD标志物,但目前日常临床实践中仅评估其中三种,即抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶(抗tTG)、抗肌内膜(EmA)和抗去酰胺麦醇溶蛋白抗体(DGP)。对文献的全面回顾确定了1998年至2022年间发表的44项原创研究,共涉及5098例儿科和成人CD患者(无选择性IgA缺乏)以及11930例疾病对照。结果表明,抗tTG IgA对CD的敏感性(93.4%)高于EmA IgA(92.8%)、DGP IgG(81.8%)和DGP IgA(83.8%)。EmA IgA的特异性(99%)高于抗tTG IgA(95.8%)、DGP IgG(96.4%)和DGP IgA(92.1%)。在与CD密切相关的选择性IgA缺乏患者中,血清学筛查应包括三种IgG类抗体中的一种,因为在这种临床情况下,抗tTG、DGP和EmA具有非常相似的诊断准确性。根据年龄,CD检测有两种主要诊断策略差异。在儿童中,修订后的2020年ESPGHAN指南规定,有症状和无症状儿童中,抗tTG IgA高滴度(>临界值的10倍)且EmA阳性即可诊断CD,无需进行十二指肠活检和HLA分型。在成年患者中,尽管高tTG IgA滴度(经EmA IgA阳性确认)与绒毛萎缩相关,但仍认为肠道活检是确诊CD的必要条件。目前,在高危群体中采用病例发现方法比大规模筛查CD更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9e/10404833/fb00449c5b67/GHFBB-16-118-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验