Suppr超能文献

国际疾病分类第八版(ICD - 8)到国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码的单向映射,用于疾病的统一纵向分析。

A unidirectional mapping of ICD-8 to ICD-10 codes, for harmonized longitudinal analysis of diseases.

作者信息

Pedersen Mette Krogh, Eriksson Robert, Reguant Roc, Collin Catherine, Pedersen Helle Krogh, Sørup Freja Karuna Hemmingsen, Simon Christian, Birch Anna Marie, Larsen Michael, Nielsen Anna Pors, Belling Kirstine, Brunak Søren

机构信息

Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;38(10):1043-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01027-y. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Abstract

Periodic revisions of the international classification of diseases (ICD) ensure that the classification reflects new practices and knowledge; however, this complicates retrospective research as diagnoses are coded in different versions. For longitudinal disease trajectory studies, a crosswalk is an essential tool and a comprehensive mapping between ICD-8 and ICD-10 has until now been lacking. In this study, we map all ICD-8 morbidity codes to ICD-10 in the expanded Danish ICD version. We mapped ICD-8 codes to ICD-10, using a many-to-one system inspired by general equivalence mappings such that each ICD-8 code maps to a single ICD-10 code. Each ICD-8 code was manually and unidirectionally mapped to a single ICD-10 code based on medical setting and context. Each match was assigned a score (1 of 4 levels) reflecting the quality of the match and, if applicable, a "flag" signalling choices made in the mapping. We provide the first complete mapping of the 8596 ICD-8 morbidity codes to ICD-10 codes. All Danish ICD-8 codes representing diseases were mapped and 5106 (59.4%) achieved the highest consistency score. Only 334 (3.9%) of the ICD-8 codes received the lowest mapping consistency score. The mapping provides a scaffold for translation of ICD-8 to ICD-10, which enable longitudinal disease studies back to and 1969 in Denmark and to 1965 internationally with further adaption.

摘要

国际疾病分类(ICD)的定期修订确保了该分类能够反映新的实践和知识;然而,这使得回顾性研究变得复杂,因为诊断编码采用了不同的版本。对于纵向疾病轨迹研究而言,一个交叉对照表是必不可少的工具,而到目前为止,ICD - 8和ICD - 10之间尚缺乏全面的映射关系。在本研究中,我们将丹麦扩展版ICD中的所有ICD - 8发病编码映射到ICD - 10。我们采用了一种受通用等效映射启发的多对一系统,将ICD - 8编码映射到ICD - 10,这样每个ICD - 8编码都映射到一个单一的ICD - 10编码。基于医疗环境和背景,每个ICD - 8编码被手动且单向地映射到一个单一的ICD - 10编码。每个匹配项都被赋予一个分数(4个等级中的1个),以反映匹配的质量,并在适用时赋予一个“标记”,以表明映射过程中所做的选择。我们首次提供了8596个ICD - 8发病编码到ICD - 10编码的完整映射。所有代表疾病的丹麦ICD - 8编码都进行了映射,其中5106个(59.4%)获得了最高的一致性分数。只有334个(3.9%)ICD - 8编码获得了最低的映射一致性分数。该映射为将ICD - 8转换为ICD - 10提供了一个框架,使得在丹麦能够开展追溯至1969年、在国际上追溯至1965年的纵向疾病研究,并可进一步进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76f/10570238/5faefacac540/10654_2023_1027_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验