• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动健康支持的主动综合征监测用于在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴早期发现新冠病毒病例:比较研究

Mobile Health-Supported Active Syndrome Surveillance for COVID-19 Early Case Finding in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Comparative Study.

作者信息

Bisrat Haileleul, Manyazewal Tsegahun, Fekadu Abebaw

机构信息

Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2023 Aug 28;12:e43492. doi: 10.2196/43492.

DOI:10.2196/43492
PMID:37556182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since most people in low-income countries do not have access to reliable laboratory services, early diagnosis of life-threatening diseases like COVID-19 remains challenging. Facilitating real-time assessment of the health status in a given population, mobile health (mHealth)-supported syndrome surveillance might help identify disease conditions earlier and save lives cost-effectively.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the potential use of mHealth-supported active syndrome surveillance for COVID-19 early case finding in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among adults randomly selected from the Ethio telecom list of mobile phone numbers. Participants underwent a comprehensive phone interview for COVID-19 syndromic assessments, and their symptoms were scored and interpreted based on national guidelines. Participants who exhibited COVID-19 syndromes were advised to have COVID-19 diagnostic testing at nearby health care facilities and seek treatment accordingly. Participants were asked about their test results, and these were cross-checked against the actual facility-based data. Estimates of COVID-19 detection by mHealth-supported syndromic assessments and facility-based tests were compared using Cohen Kappa (κ), the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2741 adults (n=1476, 53.8% men and n=1265, 46.2% women) were interviewed through the mHealth platform during the period from December 2021 to February 2022. Among them, 1371 (50%) had COVID-19 symptoms at least once and underwent facility-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing as self-reported, with 884 (64.5%) confirmed cases recorded in facility-based registries. The syndrome assessment model had an optimal likelihood cut-off point sensitivity of 46% (95% CI 38.4-54.6) and specificity of 98% (95% CI 96.7-98.9). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91). The level of agreement between the mHealth-supported syndrome assessment and the COVID-19 test results was moderate (κ=0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the level of agreement between the mHealth-supported syndromic assessment and the actual laboratory-confirmed results for COVID-19 was found to be reasonable, at 89%. The mHealth-supported syndromic assessment of COVID-19 represents a potential alternative method to the standard laboratory-based confirmatory diagnosis, enabling the early detection of COVID-19 cases in hard-to-reach communities, and informing patients about self-care and disease management in a cost-effective manner. These findings can guide future research efforts in developing and integrating digital health into continuous active surveillance of emerging infectious diseases.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/d3b1a703896f/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/4f7fb17f22ea/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/9a108284220c/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/d3b1a703896f/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/4f7fb17f22ea/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/9a108284220c/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dccd/10464850/d3b1a703896f/ijmr_v12i1e43492_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

由于低收入国家的大多数人无法获得可靠的实验室服务,对像新冠病毒病(COVID-19)这样危及生命的疾病进行早期诊断仍然具有挑战性。移动健康(mHealth)支持的综合征监测有助于促进对特定人群健康状况的实时评估,可能有助于更早地发现疾病状况并以具有成本效益的方式挽救生命。

目的

本研究旨在评估mHealth支持的主动综合征监测在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴早期发现COVID-19病例中的潜在用途。

方法

在从埃塞俄比亚电信手机号码列表中随机选择的成年人中进行了一项比较横断面研究。参与者接受了关于COVID-19综合征评估的全面电话访谈,并根据国家指南对其症状进行评分和解读。出现COVID-19综合征的参与者被建议在附近的医疗机构进行COVID-19诊断检测并相应地寻求治疗。询问参与者他们的检测结果,并将这些结果与实际的基于机构的数据进行交叉核对。使用科恩kappa(κ)、受试者工作特征曲线、敏感性和特异性分析比较了mHealth支持的综合征评估和基于机构的检测对COVID-19的检测估计值。

结果

在2021年12月至2022年2月期间,通过mHealth平台共访谈了2741名成年人(n = 1476,53.8%为男性;n = 1265,46.2%为女性)。其中,1371人(50%)至少有一次COVID-19症状,并如自我报告的那样接受了基于机构的COVID-19诊断检测,在基于机构的登记中记录了884例(64.5%)确诊病例。综合征评估模型的最佳似然截断点敏感性为46%(95%CI 38.4 - 54.6),特异性为98%(95%CI 96.7 - 98.9)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.87(95%CI 0.83 - 0.91)。mHealth支持的综合征评估与COVID-19检测结果之间的一致性水平为中等(κ = 0.54,95%CI 0.46 - 0.60)。

结论

在本研究中,发现mHealth支持的综合征评估与COVID-19实际实验室确诊结果之间的一致性水平合理,为89%。mHealth支持的COVID-19综合征评估是基于标准实验室确诊诊断的一种潜在替代方法,能够在难以到达的社区早期发现COVID-19病例,并以具有成本效益的方式告知患者自我护理和疾病管理。这些发现可为未来在开发数字健康并将其整合到新兴传染病持续主动监测方面的研究工作提供指导。

相似文献

1
Mobile Health-Supported Active Syndrome Surveillance for COVID-19 Early Case Finding in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Comparative Study.移动健康支持的主动综合征监测用于在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴早期发现新冠病毒病例:比较研究
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Aug 28;12:e43492. doi: 10.2196/43492.
2
Assessment of computer vision syndrome and associated factors among employees of Ethio-telecom in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴埃塞俄比亚电信员工的计算机视觉综合征及相关因素评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;13:1524173. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524173. eCollection 2025.
3
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
4
Comparison of syndromic versus laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema palladium, infections at the selected health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.比较埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴选定保健中心淋病奈瑟菌和梅毒螺旋体感染的症状与实验室确诊诊断。
Reprod Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01395-w.
5
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Women's perspectives on the measures that need to be taken to increase the use of health-care facility delivery service among slums women, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴:一项定性研究,探讨了贫民窟妇女对需要采取哪些措施来增加使用医疗保健机构分娩服务的看法。
Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 23;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01221-9.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
10
Knowledge, practice and associated factors towards the prevention of COVID-19 among high-risk groups: A cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.高危人群对 COVID-19 预防的知识、实践及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248420. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Detection and Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Infections Using Syndromic Surveillance: A Systematic Review.使用症状监测对胃肠道感染进行早期检测和监测:一项系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;21(4):489. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040489.
2
Patterns of childhood tuberculosis diagnosis in Ethiopia: A multicenter cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚儿童结核病诊断模式:一项多中心横断面研究。
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 29:rs.3.rs-3758745. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3758745/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping digital health ecosystems in Africa in the context of endemic infectious and non-communicable diseases.在地方性传染病和非传染性疾病背景下绘制非洲数字健康生态系统图谱。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 26;6(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00839-2.
2
The role of mobile health in prevention, diagnosis, treatment and self-care of COVID-19 from the healthcare professionals' perspectives.从医护人员的角度看移动健康在新冠病毒疾病预防、诊断、治疗及自我护理中的作用。
Digit Health. 2023 May 2;9:20552076231171969. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171969. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Diagnostic Concordance of Telemedicine as Compared With Face-to-Face Care in Primary Health Care Clinics in Rural India: Randomized Crossover Trial.
印度农村初级卫生保健诊所中远程医疗与面对面护理的诊断一致性:随机交叉试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 23;7:e42775. doi: 10.2196/42775.
4
Knowledge and Practice of Personal Protective Measures Against COVID-19 in Africa: Systematic Review.非洲人群对 COVID-19 个人防护措施的知识和实践:系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 May 16;9:e44051. doi: 10.2196/44051.
5
Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Lessons From COVID-19.大流行防范与应对:COVID-19 带来的教训。
J Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 16;228(4):422-425. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad095.
6
Digital health systems strengthening in Africa for rapid response to COVID-19.非洲加强数字卫生系统以快速应对新冠疫情。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 28;2:987828. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.987828. eCollection 2022.
7
Digital health in the era of COVID-19: Reshaping the next generation of healthcare.新冠疫情时代的数字健康:重塑下一代医疗保健。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;11:942703. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.942703. eCollection 2023.
8
Anxiety and stress among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 期间埃塞俄比亚医护人员的焦虑和压力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e070367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070367.
9
Global investments in pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: development assistance and domestic spending on health between 1990 and 2026.全球在大流行防范和 COVID-19 方面的投资:1990 年至 2026 年的发展援助和国内卫生支出。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Mar;11(3):e385-e413. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00007-4. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
10
Patient-reported usability and satisfaction with electronic medication event reminder and monitor device for tuberculosis: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.患者报告的结核病电子用药事件提醒及监测设备的可用性和满意度:一项多中心随机对照试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan 17;56:101820. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101820. eCollection 2023 Feb.