• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西公立医疗体系中治疗类风湿性关节炎的生物药物支出

Expenditure of biological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in the Brazilian public health system.

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento de Política de Medicamentos e Assistência Farmacêutica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Aug 4;57:41. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004280. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004280
PMID:37556663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10355319/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to analyze the quantity and expenses related to biological drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in outpatient public care within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

METHODS

It is a cross-sectional descriptive study based on secondary data from a historical series, referring to the purchase, volume, and the number of patients treated with different biological drugs (infliximabe, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol) for RA treatment in outpatient care from 2012 to 2017. The data were extracted from the SUS Outpatient Information System database-SIA/SUS and included ten drugs used for RA treatment. The study assessed the quantity and expenditure of these drugs, the number of RA patients treated, and the expenditure by RA subtypes. The National Broad Consumer Price Index was used to adjust the expenditures for December 2017.

RESULTS

The Ministry of Health allocated approximately $500 million to provide about 2 million units of biological drugs for RA patients from 2012 to 2017. The supply of adalimumab 40 mg and etanercept 50 mg accounted for 68.3% of the total expenditure. The subtypes "other rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor" (ICD-10 M05.8), "rheumatoid arthritis without rheumatoid factor" (ICD-10 M06.0), and "Felty's syndrome" (M05. 0) represented 84.5% of the total expenditures. The proportion of patients treated with biological drugs increased by 33.0%. There was a significant 83.0% increase in the number of patients using biological drugs compared to the overall number of RA patients treated during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained allow us to draw a more recent profile of expenditure on RA treatment and indicate trends in the use of biological drugs for this condition, generating data that can support management decisions in public health policies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析巴西全民健康覆盖体系(SUS)中,门诊公共医疗中用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的生物药物的数量和费用。

方法

这是一项基于历史序列的二次数据的横断面描述性研究,涉及 2012 年至 2017 年门诊治疗 RA 的不同生物药物(英夫利昔单抗、依那西普、阿达木单抗、利妥昔单抗、阿巴西普、托珠单抗、戈利木单抗和培塞利珠单抗)的购买量、用量和治疗患者数量。数据从 SUS 门诊信息系统数据库-SIA/SUS 中提取,包括用于 RA 治疗的 10 种药物。研究评估了这些药物的数量和支出、RA 患者的数量以及 RA 亚型的支出。采用国家广泛消费者价格指数对 2017 年 12 月的支出进行调整。

结果

2012 年至 2017 年期间,卫生部共拨款约 5 亿美元,为约 200 万 RA 患者提供生物药物。阿达木单抗 40mg 和依那西普 50mg 的供应占总支出的 68.3%。ICD-10 M05.8(其他类风湿关节炎伴类风湿因子)、ICD-10 M06.0(无类风湿因子的类风湿关节炎)和 M05.0(费尔蒂综合征)这三个亚型占总支出的 84.5%。接受生物药物治疗的患者比例增加了 33.0%。与研究期间接受 RA 治疗的所有患者相比,使用生物药物的患者数量增加了 83.0%。

结论

研究结果可以描绘出 RA 治疗支出的最新概况,并显示出生物药物治疗该病的趋势,为公共卫生政策管理决策提供数据支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0146/10355319/48b5cb749584/1518-8787-rsp-57-41-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0146/10355319/48b5cb749584/1518-8787-rsp-57-41-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0146/10355319/48b5cb749584/1518-8787-rsp-57-41-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Expenditure of biological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in the Brazilian public health system.巴西公立医疗体系中治疗类风湿性关节炎的生物药物支出
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Aug 4;57:41. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004280. eCollection 2023.
2
Effectiveness and Costs Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Targeted Immunomodulators Using Real-World U.S. Data.类风湿关节炎患者采用真实世界美国数据靶向免疫调节剂治疗的效果和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1039-1049. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.1039.
3
Real-world Effectiveness of Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis After Etanercept Discontinuation in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.英国、法国和德国生物性改善病情抗风湿药在停用依那西普后治疗类风湿关节炎的真实世界疗效
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1618-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
5
Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare.医疗保险中类风湿关节炎患者使用生物制剂与住院感染相关的比较风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):56-66. doi: 10.1002/art.39399.
6
Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Changing Biologics in the USA.美国改变生物制剂治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的治疗持久性和医疗保健费用。
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2422-2435. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0617-5. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Comparative effectiveness of first-line biological monotherapy use in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study on health care administrative databases.类风湿关节炎一线生物单药治疗的比较疗效:基于医疗保健管理数据库的风湿性疾病记录链接研究的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e021447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021447.
8
Comparative effectiveness of first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitor versus non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics and targeted synthetic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large US registry study.比较类风湿关节炎患者一线肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂与非肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂生物制剂和靶向合成药物的疗效:来自一项大型美国注册研究的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan;80(1):96-102. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217209. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
Comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis in the Brazilian Public Health System.阿达木单抗和依那西普在巴西公共卫生系统中治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效比较
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Nov;5(6):539-549. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0027. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
Treatment patterns and annual biologic costs in US veterans with rheumatic conditions or psoriasis.美国患有风湿性疾病或银屑病的退伍军人的治疗模式和年度生物制剂成本。
J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):34-43. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1086774. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Insights into the Economic Burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Latin America: A Systematic Literature Review of Regional Perspectives.拉丁美洲类风湿关节炎经济负担的综合洞察:基于区域视角的系统文献综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr 17;17:349-373. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S498994. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of biologic DMARDs on quality of life: 12-month results of a rheumatic diseases cohort using the Brazilian EQ-5D tariff.生物性改善病情抗风湿药对生活质量的影响:采用巴西EQ-5D量表的风湿病队列研究12个月结果
Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Oct;48(4):213-222. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1785212. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Adjusting for Inflation and Currency Changes Within Health Economic Studies.在健康经济研究中调整通胀和货币变化。
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):1026-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Cost of biologic treatment persistence or switching in rheumatoid arthritis.
类风湿关节炎生物制剂治疗的持续性或转换的成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP338-SP345.
4
[Profile of spending on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis for patients of the Unified Health System in the state of Minas Gerais - 2008-2013].[米纳斯吉拉斯州统一卫生系统类风湿关节炎患者治疗费用概况 - 2008 - 2013年]
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Apr;23(4):1241-1253. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018234.16352016.
5
A Nationwide Survey on Patient's versus Physician´s Evaluation of Biological Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Disease Activity and Route of Administration: The Be-Raise Study.一项关于类风湿关节炎患者与医生对生物疗法的评估与疾病活动及给药途径关系的全国性调查:Be-Raise研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0166607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166607. eCollection 2016.
6
Economic impact of expanded use of biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.在阿根廷、巴西、哥伦比亚和墨西哥扩大使用生物疗法治疗类风湿性关节炎和克罗恩病的经济影响。
J Med Econ. 2016 Dec;19(12):1187-1199. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1209508. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biological therapy.生物治疗下类风湿关节炎患者的生活质量
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 Mar-Apr;61(2):126-31. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.02.126.
8
[Cost analysis of treatment for severe rheumatoid arthritis in a city in southern Brazil].[巴西南部某城市重度类风湿关节炎治疗的成本分析]
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Nov;29 Suppl 1:S81-91. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00013513.
9
[Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: expenditures on infliximab compared to synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, 2003-2006].[巴西统一国家卫生系统中类风湿关节炎的治疗:2003 - 2006年英夫利昔单抗与合成改善病情抗风湿药的支出情况]
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Feb;30(2):283-95. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00017913.
10
Preferences of patients and health professionals for route and frequency of administration of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎治疗中患者及医疗专业人员对生物制剂给药途径和频率的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jan 20;8:93-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S55156. eCollection 2014.