• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有交流障碍的成人的双耳分听句子测验表现。

Dichotic Sentences Test Performance of Adults with communication complaints.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2023 Aug 7;35(4):e20210301. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021301pt. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232021301pt
PMID:37556702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10446753/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the performance of normal-hearing adults with communication complaints in the Dichotic Sentences Test.

METHODS

We selected from the database 15 normal-hearing participants with normal results in the Digits Dichotic Test, aged between 19 and 44 years, right-handed, who reported communicative complaints. The Dichotic Sentences Test was applied using two protocols consisting of four different combinations of lists called sequences 1 and 2, in the following order: training, divided attention step, right and left directed attention steps.

RESULTS

In the first application sequence, the average performance in the divided attention step was 84.7% for the right ear and 60.67% for the left, with statistical difference between ears. The asymmetry between ears varied from -50% to 60%. In the directed attention step, the average performance was 99.33% for the right ear and 98% for the left, with no statistical difference. In the second application sequence, there was a tendency for better results, more pronounced for the left ear, with no statistical significance, with the performance variation and asymmetry between ears remaining high. In the comparison between the sequences, in the divided attention step, it was found that, for the right ear, 40% of the individuals did not vary, 33% performed worse, and 26.7% performed better; for the left ear, 6.6% did not vary, 20% performed worse, and 73.33% performed better. There was result stability in the directed attention step.

CONCLUSION

The normal-hearing adults with communication complaints presented a heterogeneous profile, especially in the divided attention step, with a marked difference between ears and response variability.

摘要

目的

分析有交流主诉的听力正常成人在双音节词测试中的表现。

方法

我们从数据库中选择了 15 名听力正常、Digits 双音节词测试结果正常、年龄在 19 至 44 岁之间、右利手、自述有交流主诉的成年人。双音节词测试采用两种方案进行,包含四个不同的列表组合,分别称为序列 1 和 2,顺序如下:训练、分散注意力步骤、右耳和左耳定向注意力步骤。

结果

在第一个应用序列中,右耳在分散注意力步骤的平均表现为 84.7%,左耳为 60.67%,双耳之间存在统计学差异。双耳之间的不对称性在-50%至 60%之间变化。在定向注意力步骤中,右耳的平均表现为 99.33%,左耳为 98%,双耳之间无统计学差异。在第二个应用序列中,结果倾向于更好,左耳更为明显,但无统计学意义,双耳之间的表现变化和不对称性仍然较高。在两个序列之间的比较中,在分散注意力步骤中,发现右耳有 40%的个体无变化,33%的个体表现更差,26.7%的个体表现更好;左耳有 6.6%的个体无变化,20%的个体表现更差,73.33%的个体表现更好。在定向注意力步骤中存在结果稳定性。

结论

有交流主诉的听力正常成年人表现出异质性,特别是在分散注意力步骤中,双耳之间存在显著差异和反应变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/eb7ba5179455/codas-35-4-e20210301-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/a928fc009239/codas-35-4-e20210301-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/0cd9910dd5ff/codas-35-4-e20210301-g02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/e1b02f84caf4/codas-35-4-e20210301-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/eb7ba5179455/codas-35-4-e20210301-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/a928fc009239/codas-35-4-e20210301-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/0cd9910dd5ff/codas-35-4-e20210301-g02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/e1b02f84caf4/codas-35-4-e20210301-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ed/10446753/eb7ba5179455/codas-35-4-e20210301-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Dichotic Sentences Test Performance of Adults with communication complaints.具有交流障碍的成人的双耳分听句子测验表现。
Codas. 2023 Aug 7;35(4):e20210301. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021301pt. eCollection 2023.
2
Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese: a study in young adults.双耳分听句子识别测试在葡萄牙语中的应用:一项针对年轻成年人的研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul-Aug;87(4):478-485. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.018. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Variability of the dichotic sentence test in the test and retest of normal hearing adults.正常听力成年人在双耳分听句子测试中的重测变异性。
Codas. 2020 Jun 26;32(3):e20190040. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019040. eCollection 2020.
4
Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.发育性口吃中的言语双耳分听:具有非典型听觉加工的亚组
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004 Dec;17(4):224-32.
5
Aging effect on dichotic listening of Cantonese.粤语双耳分听的老化效应。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Sep;49(9):651-6. doi: 10.3109/14992021003793942.
6
Factors affecting the Mandarin dichotic digits test.影响普通话双听分听测试的因素。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):774-779. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1639081. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: laterality effects of directed attention.右利手和左利手成年人的言语双耳分听:定向注意的偏侧化效应。
Cortex. 2006 Jan;42(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70324-1.
8
Hemispheric priming affects right-ear advantage in dichotic listening.半球启动效应影响双耳分听中的右耳优势。
Int J Neurosci. 1994 Jan-Feb;74(1-4):71-7. doi: 10.3109/00207459408987230.
9
Investigating the Interaction between Dichotic Deficits and Cognitive Abilities Using the Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT) Part 2.使用双耳数字差异测试(DDdT)研究双耳缺陷与认知能力之间的相互作用 第2部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):470-479. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15085.
10
The Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT): Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies Part 1.双耳数字差异测试(DDdT):开发、常模数据及重测信度研究 第1部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):458-469. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15084.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of an automated dichotic double word test in Indian English using MATLAB.使用 MATLAB 开发和验证印地安英语自动化双词测验。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;144:110697. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110697. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese: a study in young adults.双耳分听句子识别测试在葡萄牙语中的应用:一项针对年轻成年人的研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul-Aug;87(4):478-485. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.018. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Variability of the dichotic sentence test in the test and retest of normal hearing adults.
正常听力成年人在双耳分听句子测试中的重测变异性。
Codas. 2020 Jun 26;32(3):e20190040. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019040. eCollection 2020.
4
A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry.双耳分听作为一种评估大脑两半球不对称性的范式的基础介绍。
Laterality. 2019 Nov;24(6):740-771. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1598426. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Influence of the age, level of schooling and gender on the occurrence of the DSI test pauses.年龄、受教育程度和性别对DSI测试停顿发生率的影响。
Codas. 2018 Oct 8;30(5):e20170286. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017286.
6
How to get a left-ear advantage: A technical review of assessing brain asymmetry with dichotic listening.如何获得左耳优势:用双耳分听评估大脑不对称性的技术综述。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Feb;59(1):66-73. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12408.
7
Age-related changes in auditory processing and speech perception: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.听觉处理与言语感知的年龄相关变化:横断面与纵向分析
Eur J Ageing. 2017 Jan 24;14(3):269-281. doi: 10.1007/s10433-017-0410-y. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening.记忆和注意力对双耳分听中耳朵优势的影响。
Hear Res. 2016 Dec;342:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
The Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT): Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies Part 1.双耳数字差异测试(DDdT):开发、常模数据及重测信度研究 第1部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):458-469. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15084.
10
Speech processing asymmetry revealed by dichotic listening and functional brain imaging.通过双耳分听和功能性脑成像揭示的言语处理不对称性。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt B):466-481. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 17.