Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, No.81 Lingnan Avenue North, Chancheng District, Foshan, Guangdong Province, China.
UNSW Microbiome Research Centre, St George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Clinical Sciences (WR Pitney) Building, Short St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 9;21(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02975-8.
The results of human observational studies on the correlation between gut microbiota perturbations and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have been contradictory. This study aimed to perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the specificity of the gut microbiota in PCOS patients compared to healthy women.
Literature through May 22, 2023, was searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wiley Online Library databases. Unreported data in diversity indices were filled by downloading and processing raw sequencing data. Systematic review inclusion: original studies were eligible if they applied an observational case-control design, performed gut microbiota analysis and reported diversity or abundance measures, sampled general pre-menopausal women with PCOS, and are longitudinal studies with baseline comparison between PCOS patients and healthy females. Systematic review exclusion: studies that conducted interventional or longitudinal comparisons in the absence of a control group. Two researchers made abstract, full-text, and data extraction decisions, independently. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the methodologic quality. Hedge's g standardized mean difference (SMD), confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity (I) for alpha diversity were calculated. Qualitative syntheses of beta-diversity and microbe alterations were performed.
Twenty-eight studies (n = 1022 patients, n = 928 control) that investigated gut microbiota by collecting stool samples were included, with 26 and 27 studies having provided alpha-diversity and beta-diversity results respectively. A significant decrease in microbial evenness and phylogenetic diversity was observed in PCOS patients when compared with control participants (Shannon index: SMD = - 0.27; 95% CI, - 0.37 to - 0.16; phylogenetic diversity: SMD = - 0.39; 95% CI, -- 0.74 to - 0.03). We also found that reported beta-diversity was inconsistent between studies. Despite heterogeneity in bacterial relative abundance, we observed depletion of Lachnospira and Prevotella and enrichment of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Lactobacillus, Fusobacterium, and Escherichia/Shigella in PCOS. Gut dysbiosis in PCOS, which might be characterized by the reduction of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing and bile-acid-metabolizing bacteria, suggests a shift in balance to favor pro-inflammatory rather than anti-inflammatory bacteria.
Gut dysbiosis in PCOS is associated with decreased diversity and alterations in bacteria involved in microbiota-host crosstalk.
PROSPERO registration: CRD42021285206, May 22, 2023.
关于肠道微生物群紊乱与多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)之间相关性的人体观察性研究结果存在矛盾。本研究旨在进行首次系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 PCOS 患者与健康女性相比肠道微生物群的特异性。
截至 2023 年 5 月 22 日,通过 PubMed、Web of Science、Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Wiley Online Library 数据库检索文献。通过下载和处理原始测序数据,填补多样性指数中未报告的数据。系统综述纳入标准:如果应用观察性病例对照设计、进行肠道微生物组分析并报告多样性或丰度测量值、采样一般绝经前 PCOS 患者且为具有基线 PCOS 患者与健康女性之间比较的纵向研究,则符合系统综述纳入标准。系统综述排除标准:没有对照组的干预或纵向比较研究。两名研究人员分别对摘要、全文和数据提取做出决策。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所批判性评估清单评估方法学质量。计算 alpha 多样性的 Hedge's g 标准化均数差(SMD)、置信区间(CI)和异质性(I)。对 beta 多样性和微生物变化进行定性综合分析。
共纳入 28 项研究(n = 1022 例患者,n = 928 例对照),通过收集粪便样本研究肠道微生物群,其中 26 项和 27 项研究分别提供了 alpha 多样性和 beta 多样性结果。与对照组相比,PCOS 患者的微生物均匀度和系统发育多样性显著降低(香农指数:SMD = -0.27;95%CI,-0.37 至-0.16;系统发育多样性:SMD = -0.39;95%CI,-0.74 至-0.03)。我们还发现,报告的 beta 多样性在研究之间不一致。尽管细菌相对丰度存在异质性,但我们观察到 PCOS 中 Lachnospira 和 Prevotella 的减少和 Bacteroides、Parabacteroides、Lactobacillus、Fusobacterium 和 Escherichia/Shigella 的富集。PCOS 中的肠道菌群失调可能表现为产生短链脂肪酸(SCFA)和代谢胆汁酸的细菌减少,表明平衡向有利于促炎而不是抗炎细菌的方向转变。
PCOS 中的肠道菌群失调与多样性降低和参与微生物群-宿主相互作用的细菌变化有关。
PROSPERO 注册:CRD42021285206,2023 年 5 月 22 日。