• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧双通道内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔入路术与全内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔入路术的疗效比较。

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: An Outcome Comparison With the Full-endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Science and Education, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 1;37(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001507. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001507
PMID:37559217
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective control study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the curative effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) with full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (FPCF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are few studies directly comparing outcomes between UBE-PCF and FPCF. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes between UBE-PCF and FPCF.

METHODS

A retrospective control study was conducted for 69 patients of cervical radiculopathy from July 2019 to December 2021. Clinical outcomes scores, including neck disability index, visual analog scale (VAS)-arm, and VAS-neck were evaluated. Serum creatine kinase levels and the size of the operating hole were measured.

RESULTS

Postoperative neck disability index, VAS-neck, and VAS-arm scores showed statistically significant improvement over preoperative scores ( P <0.01). The operating time was significantly shorter in the UBE-PCF group ( P <0.001). No significant differences were found in serum creatine kinase levels between the 2 groups ( P >0.05). The mean area of the operating hole was 1.47+0.05 cm 2 in the FPCF group and 1.79+0.11 cm 2 in the UBE-PCF group. The difference was statistically significant ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both UBE-PCF and FPCF are safe and effective procedures for cervical radiculopathy. Predictable and sufficient decompression could be achieved by UBE-PCF in a shorter operation time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment Benefits Level III.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性对照研究。

目的

比较单侧双通道内镜下颈椎后外侧孔切开术(UBE-PCF)与全内镜下颈椎后外侧孔切开术(FPCF)的疗效。

背景资料概要

很少有研究直接比较 UBE-PCF 和 FPCF 的结果。本研究的目的是比较 UBE-PCF 和 FPCF 的结果。

方法

对 2019 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月的 69 例神经根型颈椎病患者进行回顾性对照研究。评估临床结果评分,包括颈椎残障指数(NDI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)-手臂和 VAS-颈部;测量血清肌酸激酶水平和手术孔大小。

结果

术后 NDI、VAS-颈部和 VAS-手臂评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.01)。UBE-PCF 组的手术时间明显缩短(P<0.001)。两组间血清肌酸激酶水平无显著差异(P>0.05)。FPCF 组手术孔的平均面积为 1.47±0.05cm2,UBE-PCF 组为 1.79±0.11cm2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论

UBE-PCF 和 FPCF 都是治疗神经根型颈椎病安全有效的方法。UBE-PCF 可在更短的手术时间内实现可预测且充分的减压。

证据水平

治疗效益等级 III。

相似文献

1
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: An Outcome Comparison With the Full-endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.单侧双通道内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔入路术与全内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔入路术的疗效比较。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 1;37(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001507. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective analysis.单侧双通道内镜与全内镜下颈椎侧路椎间孔成形术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效比较:回顾性分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 17;47(1):803. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03046-z.
3
Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic versus Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Disc Disease.经皮全内镜与双管内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔切开术治疗单侧颈椎椎间孔盘病变。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):539-547. doi: 10.4055/cios22050. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.单侧双孔道内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术的临床结果与并发症:一项系统评价和Meta分析,并与全内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术进行比较
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):807-819. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448430.215. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.采用管道进行微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术以防止不必要的融合:一项长期随访研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct;29(4):358-364. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171003. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创后路颈椎侧方减压术作为单侧颈椎病神经根病的替代方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):1731-1739. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003156.
7
Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.基于 O 型臂导航的微创全内窥镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔切开术。
Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):E215-E223.
8
Surgical Treatment of Single Level Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) Versus Cervical Disk Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF).单节段神经根型颈椎病的手术治疗:前路颈椎减压融合术(ACDF)、颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与后路颈椎椎间孔切开术(PCF)的比较
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):149-154. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001316. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与后路颈椎侧方减压术治疗单节段单侧神经根型颈椎病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jun 1;15(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01723-5.
10
Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Via Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Approach for Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.后路颈椎侧方入路内镜下与显微镜下治疗神经根型颈椎病的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1):41-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Posterior Decompression of Thoracic Myelopathy Caused by Single-level Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum.双门内镜下脊柱手术治疗单节段胸段黄韧带骨化所致胸段脊髓病的后路减压
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Dec 20;9(3):321-330. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0094. eCollection 2025 May 27.
2
Managing water dynamics for optimal outcomes in unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery: preliminary results in a new operative channel.在单侧双孔道内镜手术中管理水动力学以实现最佳效果:新手术通道的初步结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 21;26(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08645-5.
3
[Research progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy technology in cervical degenerative disease].
[单侧双通道内镜技术在颈椎退行性疾病中的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Apr 15;39(4):495-503. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202412037.
4
Short-term efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy technology in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.单侧双通道内镜技术治疗神经根型颈椎病的短期疗效
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):118-127. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08545-7. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective analysis.单侧双通道内镜与全内镜下颈椎侧路椎间孔成形术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效比较:回顾性分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 17;47(1):803. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03046-z.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.单侧双孔道内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术的临床结果与并发症:一项系统评价和Meta分析,并与全内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术进行比较
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):807-819. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448430.215. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications of biportal and uniportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗神经根型颈椎病的单入路与双入路的临床疗效及并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Aug 14;35(3):583-593. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1820.