Suppr超能文献

舌下免疫疗法治疗哮喘伴变应性鼻炎患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck surgery, Yuyao People's Hospital, Yuyao, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023 Nov;37(6):766-776. doi: 10.1177/19458924231193528. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been widely applied to treat patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). However, meta-analyses on the efficacy of SLIT in AR patients with asthma are still limited.

METHODS

Literature without language limitation published before October 28, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. STATA 16.0 software was used for the meta-analysis of the extracted data. The results reported were symptom scores, drug scores, adverse effects rates, and cost of treatment.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1722 patients met the inclusion criteria. The total rhinitis score (TRSS) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.23, 95% CI: -1.39--1.06,  < .001) and total asthma symptom score (TASS) (WMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.12-0.89,  < .001) were significantly lower in the SLIT group than the placebo group. The SLIT group had higher rates of treatment-related adverse events (relative risk [RR] = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.77-4.48,  < .001) and total costs of treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-0.97,  < .001). There was no significant difference in inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose ( = .195), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ( = .158), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ( = .237), and direct costs of treatment ( = .630) between the SLIT and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

SLIT may be a therapeutic method for improving rhinitis symptoms and asthma symptoms in AR patients with asthma. However, as there was significant heterogeneity in results, more high-quality and well-designed studies are needed in the future to elucidate the efficacy of SLIT.

摘要

目的

舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)已广泛应用于治疗过敏性鼻炎(AR)患者。然而,关于 SLIT 治疗哮喘合并 AR 患者的疗效的荟萃分析仍然有限。

方法

检索了 2022 年 10 月 28 日前在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 上发表的无语言限制的文献。使用 STATA 16.0 软件对提取的数据进行荟萃分析。报告的结果为症状评分、药物评分、不良反应发生率和治疗费用。

结果

纳入了 10 项研究,共 1722 名患者。与安慰剂组相比,SLIT 组的总鼻炎评分(TRSS)(加权均数差 [WMD]=-1.23,95%CI:-1.39--1.06, < .001)和总哮喘症状评分(TASS)(WMD=-1.00,95%CI:-1.12-0.89, < .001)均显著降低。SLIT 组治疗相关不良反应发生率(相对风险 [RR]=2.82,95%CI:1.77-4.48, < .001)和总治疗费用(标准化均数差 [SMD]=0.71,95%CI:0.45-0.97, < .001)较高。两组吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)剂量( = .195)、呼出气一氧化氮分数(FeNO)( = .158)、1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)( = .237)和治疗直接费用( = .630)差异无统计学意义。

结论

SLIT 可能是改善哮喘合并 AR 患者鼻炎症状和哮喘症状的一种治疗方法。然而,由于结果存在显著异质性,未来需要更多高质量和精心设计的研究来阐明 SLIT 的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验