Suppr超能文献

普通胸外科手术后仅根据漏气(无液体)标准进行胸腔引流管理的结果——一项引流学研究

Outcomes of chest drain management using only air leak (without fluid) criteria for removal after general thoracic surgery-a drainology study.

作者信息

Abdul Khader Ashiq, Pons Aina, Palmares Abigail, Booth Sarah, Smith Alexander, Proli Chiara, De Sousa Paulo, Lim Eric

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, Imperial College and The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):3776-3782. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1810. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest drain management is a variable aspect of postoperative care in thoracic surgery, with different opinion for air and drain volume output. We aim to study if acceptable safety was maintained using air leak criteria alone.

METHODS

A 9-year retrospective analysis of protocolised chest drain management using digital drain air leak cut off less than 20 mL/min for more than 6 h for drain removal in patients undergoing general thoracic surgery. We excluded patients if a chest drain was not required nor removed during admission or if patients underwent volume reduction or pneumonectomy. Withdrawal criteria were suspected bleeding or chylothorax. Postoperative films were reviewed to document post-drain removal pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and reintervention (drain re-insertion).

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2021, 1,187 patients had thoracic surgery under a single surgeon. Following exclusion and withdrawal criteria, 797 patients were left for analysis. The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 61 [16] years and 383 (48%) were male. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of drain insertion was 1 [1-2] day with a median length of hospital stay of 4 [2-6] days. Post-drain removal pneumothorax was observed in 141 (17.7%), post-drain removal pleural effusion was observed in 75 (9.4%) and re-intervention (reinsertion of chest drain) required in 17 (2.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate acceptable levels of safety using digital assessment of air leak as the sole criteria for drain removal in selected patients after general thoracic surgery.

摘要

背景

胸腔引流管理是胸外科术后护理中一个存在差异的方面,对于气体和引流量输出存在不同观点。我们旨在研究仅使用漏气标准是否能维持可接受的安全性。

方法

对接受普通胸外科手术患者的胸腔引流管理进行了一项为期9年的回顾性分析,采用数字引流漏气截断值小于20 mL/分钟且持续超过6小时作为拔除引流管的标准。如果患者在入院期间不需要也未拔除胸腔引流管,或者患者接受了肺减容术或肺切除术,则将其排除。撤管标准为疑似出血或乳糜胸。复查术后胸片以记录拔管后气胸、胸腔积液和再次干预情况(重新插入引流管)。

结果

2012年至2021年期间,1187例患者在同一外科医生的操作下接受了胸外科手术。根据排除和撤管标准,797例患者留作分析。平均年龄[标准差(SD)]为61[16]岁,男性383例(48%)。引流管插入的中位时间[四分位间距(IQR)]为1[1 - 2]天,中位住院时间为4[2 - 6]天。拔管后气胸发生率为141例(17.7%),拔管后胸腔积液发生率为75例(9.4%),需要再次干预(重新插入胸腔引流管)的有17例(2.1%)。

结论

我们的结果表明,在普通胸外科手术后的特定患者中,将漏气的数字评估作为拔除引流管的唯一标准,安全性水平是可接受的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e701/10407534/1ccb2f04f593/jtd-15-07-3776-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验